summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1262
blob: 63d99aa9289847356f6711816f5e0ffc1943ab06 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
<think>
Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "avocado test framework fails to report when QEMU exits unexpectedly." The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.

First, let me understand what the bug is about. It's related to the Avocado test framework not reporting when QEMU exits unexpectedly. So, it's an issue with how tests are handled or reported when QEMU crashes or terminates abruptly.

Looking at the categories:

- Mistranslation and assembly seem related to code conversion issues, which doesn't fit here.
- The other category is a catch-all for things that don't fit elsewhere.
- Device, graphic, socket, network: these are more about hardware or communication, not directly related to test reporting.
- KVM is a hypervisor technology; the issue isn't specific to KVM but rather QEMU in general.
- Boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals: none of these seem to fit directly. The bug is about testing and reporting, not about booting, VNC, etc.
- Hypervisor is related to virtualization management; again, the issue is more about test handling.

So, since it's about the Avocado framework failing to report QEMU exits, which is a behavior in how tests are managed and reported, it doesn't fall under any of the specific categories except possibly 'other'. Therefore, I think the correct category is 'other'.
</think>

other