1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
|
<think>
Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Record/replay example does not work." The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
First, let me understand what the bug is about. Record/replay in QEMU usually refers to a feature that allows capturing and replaying of guest machine operations. This is often used for debugging or testing purposes.
Now, looking at the categories:
- Mistranslation: relates to incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, which might cause issues when running code. But if the record/replay isn't working, it's not necessarily about translation errors unless specific to that.
- Assembly: lowering assembly code. Unlikely related unless the issue is in how assembly is being handled during recording or replaying.
- Other: a general category for bugs that don't fit elsewhere.
The other categories like device, graphic, etc., are more specific to particular components or features of QEMU.
Since record/replay isn't tied directly to any specific component listed (like network, KVM, vnc), and it's not about performance or debugging tools per se. It might be a problem with how the feature itself is implemented, which could fall under 'other' because it doesn't fit into the more specific categories.
So, I think 'other' would be the appropriate category here.
</think>
The bug report regarding the non-functioning record/replay example in QEMU does not specifically align with any of the listed specialized categories such as network or hypervisor. It's more about a feature malfunction rather than a component-specific issue, making 'other' the suitable classification.
**Answer:** other
|