summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1092
blob: ffe98232dd14f97ec05049ec80e3b92c56b71962 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
<think>
Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The issue is about the translation of PowerPC instructions `sraw` and `sraw.` not setting the `ca` or `ca32` flags as they should according to the PowerISA 3.1b document. 

First, let me understand what each category means:

- **Instruction:** This would be if there's a problem with how a specific instruction is handled by QEMU.
- **Syscall:** If the issue was related to system calls, like incorrect handling of OS-level operations.
- **Runtime:** Other runtime errors that don't fall into the above categories.

Looking at the bug report, it specifically mentions that `sraw` and `sraw.` instructions aren't setting certain flags. These are PowerPC-specific instructions, so this points towards an issue in how QEMU translates or executes these particular instructions.

The user also provided links to parts of the QEMU codebase where these translations occur, indicating it's a problem with the instruction handling rather than something like system calls or other runtime issues.

Since the problem is about specific CPU instructions not behaving as per the ISA documentation, it fits into the **instruction** category. It's not related to syscalls or general runtime errors but directly tied to how these particular instructions are implemented in QEMU.
</think>

The bug report describes an issue with how certain PowerPC instructions (`sraw` and `sraw.`) are translated by QEMU, specifically that they don't set the expected flags. This falls under instruction handling.

instruction