summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1471
blob: 344f316c8934f8290e4396ddbfa75d71ed01a186 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
<think>
Alright, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me go through each part step by step.

First, the problem is that when running an amd64 build of curl using qemu-x86_64, it's throwing a SSL error related to bad signature during key exchange. The same setup works with aarch64 and previous commits, so something changed in commit 16fc5726a6.

The user ran a git bisect and found that this specific commit introduced the issue. They also mentioned that the problem persists at the current tip of the repository, which suggests it's not just a temporary bug but something deeper.

Looking at the error message: curl is failing with an SSL error about bad signature during key exchange. That points to issues in how the SSL/TLS handshake is handled by the emulated environment. So it's related to cryptographic operations or perhaps how QEMU handles certain instructions or system calls that are critical for SSL/TLS.

Now, considering the categories:

1. **Instruction**: If the bug was due to a faulty instruction being executed incorrectly by QEMU, this would fall here. For example, if an x86_64 instruction wasn't emulated properly, leading to incorrect computations in curl's SSL process.

2. **Syscall**: This category would be relevant if there were issues with system calls made by the guest OS or application that QEMU failed to handle correctly. For example, if a syscall related to network or cryptography wasn't implemented properly.

3. **Runtime**: This is for other runtime errors not covered by instructions or syscalls. Issues like memory management, timing problems, or unexpected behavior during execution would fit here.

In this case, the SSL error suggests that the problem arises during the execution of the program (curl) when performing cryptographic operations. Since the aarch64 version works but the x86_64 doesn't, it's likely related to how QEMU emulates certain instructions or handles specific operations needed for SSL/TLS.

I'm leaning towards **instruction** because SSL/TLS heavily relies on cryptographic operations that are often handled by specific CPU instructions. If QEMU is not correctly emulating these instructions, especially in the amd64 target, it could lead to incorrect calculations and thus SSL handshake failures.

However, I should also consider if this could be a syscall issue. Maybe the way QEMU handles certain syscalls related to cryptography or network operations has changed, causing issues for x86_64 but not aarch64. But since curl is using its own SSL implementation (like OpenSSL), which relies on CPU instructions rather than syscalls, it's more likely an instruction emulation issue.

Therefore, the most appropriate category is **instruction**.
</think>

instruction