1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
|
<think>
Okay, so I need to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU. The user provided a detailed problem description and some steps. Let me try to understand what's going on here.
The issue is that when running a binary in QEMU with RISC-V64 baremetal emulation, there's an illegal instruction happening after a jal (jump and link) instruction. From the code snippet:
0x80006070: addi a0,zero,2
0x80006074: jal ra,-3940 # 0x80005110
Then, the next address is 0x80006078 which has an illegal instruction. The problem seems to be that after the jal, instead of taking the jump correctly, the execution continues into an invalid area, causing an exception.
So, looking at this, it's about how QEMU handles certain instructions and jumps. The issue arises during runtime when executing the binary, not necessarily with a system call or a faulty instruction itself but perhaps in how the program flow is managed.
Now, considering the categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. This doesn't seem to involve a syscall error because there's no mention of any system calls failing. It also isn't about a faulty instruction per se, since jal and addi are valid instructions, but rather an issue with the program flow—like how jumps or returns are handled.
Therefore, this seems like a runtime issue where the emulator is incorrectly handling the jump or not properly setting up the return address, leading to execution of invalid code. So, I think it falls under 'runtime'.
</think>
The bug report describes an error that occurs during runtime when executing instructions in QEMU, specifically with how jumps and returns are handled.
runtime
|