1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
<think>
Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me read through the problem carefully to figure out where it's going wrong.
The user reports that when they run QEMU with the -d in_asm option on a 0.14.0 release, the output about memory sections is incorrect compared to the 0.12.5 version. They provided examples of the logs from both versions and noted discrepancies.
In the 0.14.0 version, after running the command, the guest address space relocation shows different sections than expected. For instance, in 0.12.5, the sections start at addresses like 08048000, but in 0.14.0, they're starting at lower addresses like 00f38000 and so on. The user identified that the problem lies in exec.c where there's a change in how memory regions are walked.
They compared the code between the two releases. In 0.12.5, the end calculation was done with a shift of (i << (32 - L1_BITS)) | (j << TARGET_PAGE_BITS), while in 0.14.0, it's using V_L1_SHIFT which is 10 instead of 22 as per 32 - L1_BITS. The user made a patch to adjust the shift by adding TARGET_PAGE_BITS to V_L1_SHIFT.
So the issue seems to be related to how QEMU calculates or reports memory regions during execution, specifically when using the disassembly option. This affects the debugging output but doesn't seem to crash the program; it's more about incorrect information being logged.
The problem arises during runtime because the logging happens as part of executing the program in the emulator. It's not a fault in an instruction or a syscall error, but rather how memory is tracked and displayed while running.
Therefore, this bug falls under the "runtime" category since it's related to errors that occur while the program is running, specifically in handling memory regions.
</think>
runtime
|