blob: 586a63ecb6aa8aa1d836b3b36859a290b7beba88 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
<think>
Okay, I need to classify this bug report under one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's read through the problem description carefully.
The issue is a segmentation fault occurring in the TCG thread when calling a helper function. The problem happens because the generated code doesn't correctly load the upper 32 bits of the address for lookup_tb_ptr before branching to it. According to LLDB, the program tries to access an incorrect address (0x1cffe060) instead of the correct one (0x7ff71cffe060).
The user points out that in the TCG code generation file (tcg-target.c.inc), there's a specific line causing this issue. The problematic code is `t2 = t1 & ~(0xffffUL << s1);`. They suggest changing it to use `ULL` instead of `UL`, which would correctly handle 64-bit operations.
This seems like an error in how the instructions are generated, specifically with handling addresses on a 64-bit system. The incorrect mask (using UL instead of ULL) leads to truncation, causing the wrong address being accessed, hence the segmentation fault.
Since the problem arises from how the code is generated and executed at runtime, particularly due to an incorrect instruction or operation in the TCG-generated code, this falls under a runtime error. The bug isn't related to a system call (syscall) issue nor is it about a faulty machine instruction per se but rather an error in the compiled code's handling of addresses.
So, categorizing this as 'runtime' makes sense because it's an error that occurs during execution due to incorrect address handling in generated code.
</think>
runtime
|