blob: 4a97c9379da9cd1549d40819bf8f83f8c76a4005 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
|
<think>
Okay, so I need to classify this bug report as either user-mode or system-mode related. Let me start by understanding the context of the problem.
The user is trying to boot a Debian Hurd image using qemu-system-i386 on an ARM platform. The error message they're encountering is about QEMU failing with an assertion in qemu-coroutine-lock.c, specifically that qemu_in_coroutine() failed. This leads to an abort signal and a backtrace showing various system calls.
From what I know, QEMU can run in two main modes: user-mode and system-mode emulation. User-mode typically involves running applications without full OS support, while system-mode emulates the entire system, including hardware devices and peripherals.
In this case, the user is trying to boot an operating system image (debian-hurd-20150320.img) with qemu-system-i386. The term 'system' in the executable name suggests they're using QEMU's system-mode emulation because it emulates a full system including CPU and devices.
The error occurs during the boot process, which is part of the system initialization. This indicates that the issue is likely related to how QEMU handles system-level operations rather than individual user applications. The assertion failure in coroutine lock management could be due to issues with device emulation or handling higher-privilege operations required for booting an OS.
Additionally, the backtrace includes functions like __libc_do_syscall and __GI_abort, which are part of the C library and handle system-level calls and errors, further pointing towards a system-mode issue.
Considering that the bug report mentions using QEMU to emulate an entire system (i386 architecture on ARM), this is definitely within system-mode's scope as it involves emulating hardware components necessary for booting an OS.
So putting it all together, the bug seems to be related to how QEMU handles system-level emulation when running a full OS image, making it a system-mode issue.
</think>
system
|