blob: 37db257fd38b8ad46f9d9f26e6bab447d7eb1d11 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
<think>
Okay, so I'm trying to figure out whether this QEMU bug is user-mode or system-mode related. Let's start by understanding what the report says.
The assertion failure message mentions `bdrv_co_write_req_prepare` and points to line 1982 in block/io.c. The error is that a write operation is being attempted, but the child device doesn't have the BLK_PERM_WRITE permission. From my limited knowledge, QEMU handles disk I/O through these block devices, so this seems like an issue with how data is written.
Looking at the reproducer script, it uses `qemu-system-i386` and sets up a machine with specific drives and devices. It's using ATAPI via ide-cd and interacts with various memory addresses. The commands sent seem to be setting up some kind of device configuration or triggering an operation that leads to the error.
The stack trace shows functions related to block I/O operations, like `bdrv_co_write_req_prepare` and others in block/io.c and block-backend.c. These are part of QEMU's core handling for disk images and storage devices. The fact that it's dealing with permissions (BLK_PERM_WRITE) suggests it's about allowing or disallowing certain operations on the virtual disks.
So, considering this is all within QEMU's handling of block devices and I/O, which are lower-level components involved in emulating hardware, this seems like a system-mode issue. System-mode relates to higher privileges and device interactions, which matches with disk permissions and storage operations. It's not something an application would typically cause; it's more about the virtual machine's infrastructure.
I think the key here is that the bug involves block device permissions and I/O handling within QEMU itself, which operates at a lower level than user applications. Therefore, this should be classified as 'system-mode'.
</think>
system
|