1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
<think>
Okay, so I'm trying to figure out whether this bug report is related to user-mode or system-mode in QEMU. Let me go through the information provided step by step.
First, the user mentioned that set_robust_list and clone are reported as unimplemented. They also noted that signal syscalls were reported separately in a Launchpad bug. From what I know, QEMU can run in two modes: user-mode emulation (where it emulates an entire system) and system-mode (where it runs a full OS with hardware emulation).
Looking at the strace output provided, it shows a lot of system calls like mmap2, mprotect, clone, etc. These are typically used by applications running under QEMU in user-mode. The fact that these syscalls are being made suggests that QEMU is emulating a user-space environment.
The error messages indicate that certain functions aren't implemented. For example, set_robust_list and clone are failing with "unimplemented" or "Function not implemented". These are system calls used by applications to manage thread resources and threading, respectively. Since they're part of the application's execution, it points towards user-mode issues.
Additionally, the write syscall is outputting a failure message to stdout, which again is something an application would do in user-space.
The Launchpad bug link provided is about signal syscalls not being implemented correctly. Signals are handled at the system call level and are crucial for applications to function properly. If they're unimplemented or misbehaving, it affects the applications running under QEMU's user-mode.
Considering all this, the issues seem to stem from how QEMU handles certain system calls that applications rely on in a user-mode environment. Therefore, this bug is likely related to user-mode emulation.
</think>
user
|