restructure results

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2771 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2771
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..062a4f77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2771
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The error message is:
+
+"qemu-system-x86_64: ../block/block-backend.c:1290: blk_in_drain: Assertion `qemu_in_main_thread()' failed."
+
+First, let me parse the components of this error. The file in question is block-backend.c, specifically line 1290. The function is blk_in_drain, and there's an assertion failure that we're not in the main thread.
+
+I remember that QEMU has a main thread where certain operations are supposed to be executed for safety reasons, especially when dealing with device-level interactions. Block operations involve handling storage devices, which could include things like hard drives, ISO images, etc. So, block-backend.c is part of the block layer in QEMU, managing how block devices are accessed and handled.
+
+The assertion failure here suggests that the code tried to execute blk_in_drain while not being on the main thread, but this operation was only supposed to happen there. This could be due to a concurrency issue or incorrect threading usage elsewhere in the code.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Block operations are typically related to storage devices, which fall under peripherals. The function name includes 'blk', which relates to block devices. So the category that makes sense here is 'peripherals'.
+
+I don't think it's a translation issue because the error is about threading and main thread checks, not semantic mapping. It's also not directly about performance or files, as those categories are more specific to other aspects.
+
+So, I'm leaning towards 'peripherals' as the category for this bug.
+</think>
+
+The assertion failure in block-backend.c likely relates to incorrect handling of block device operations outside the main thread, which falls under peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file