restructure results

274 files changed, 4926 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1000 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1000
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..acf5096c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1000
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user is asking if QEMU can support multiple different cores (like arm Cortex-M3, cortex-m33, and context-a53) on a single machine and have them communicate via mailbox.
+
+First, I look at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The question is about having multiple cores on one machine and their communication. So it's not about how code is translated or about graphics/networking/etc. It's more about the hardware configuration within QEMU.
+
+I remember that in QEMU, each machine is defined by a target CPU, but maybe there's a way to have multiple CPUs with different architectures. Since the user mentioned mailbox communication, which likely involves some form of inter-core messaging, perhaps using shared memory or specific QEMU features.
+
+This seems related to how QEMU models the hardware, particularly the motherboard and CPU cores. So I think it falls under 'peripherals' because it's about connecting different components (cores) within the virtual machine setup.
+
+Alternatively, maybe it's under 'device' if it's about adding multiple devices, but since they're all CPUs connected via a communication method, 'peripherals' feels more accurate as it pertains to the overall hardware configuration and how cores interact.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/102 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/102
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d863d4c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/102
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Mouse stops working when connected USB-storage device." The categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, the issue is about a mouse stopping when a USB storage device is connected. So it's related to hardware devices, specifically USB. The mouse is a peripheral, but more importantly, connecting a storage device affects other devices. This sounds like an interaction between different hardware components under QEMU's management.
+
+Looking at the categories, "peripherals" could be relevant since both mouse and USB are peripherals. But the problem seems related to how the USB device is handled, possibly causing issues with other devices. Maybe it's a resource conflict or incorrect driver behavior when multiple USB devices are attached.
+
+Another category is "device," which is broader but might fit because it's about device interaction. However, "peripherals" feels more precise here because we're dealing with specific hardware devices connected via USB.
+
+I think the best fit is "peripherals." It directly relates to the mouse and USB storage devices being peripherals under QEMU's control.
+</think>
+
+The issue involves a peripheral (mouse) malfunctioning when another peripheral (USB-storage device) is connected, making the most appropriate category:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1020309 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1020309
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d9cc471b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1020309
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification step by step. The issue is with QEMU for PowerPC (qemu-system-ppc) where after saving and loading a VM snapshot, the keyboard stops working. 
+
+First, I'll go through the problem description again to understand what's happening. After creating a test image and starting the VM, the user changes to a different console using Ctrl-Alt-2, saves the VM state with "savevm", exits, reloads the saved state, switches back to the guest display, and then finds that typing or sending keys via the console does nothing.
+
+The user tested this across multiple branches—master, stable-1.0, stable-0.15—and all exhibit the same behavior. So, it's a consistent issue.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: 
+
+- **mistranslation**: This relates to incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target in user-mode. Not sure if this applies here since the keyboard issue is more about I/O handling.
+  
+- **assembly**: Assembly lowering issues. Doesn't seem relevant as the problem isn't with code translation but with device input.
+
+- **other**: A catch-all category, but let's see if another category fits better.
+
+Other options include **device**, **graphic**, **socket**, **network**, etc. Since the issue is about keyboard input not working after resume, which involves hardware emulation (specifically, the input devices), it might fall under **peripherals**. The keyboard is a peripheral device, and QEMU emulates these. If saving/loading state doesn't correctly restore the state of the keyboard or its handling in the emulator, that would be a peripherals issue.
+
+I don't think it's related to graphics (graphic) because the problem isn't with the display but input. Similarly, network, socket, or hypervisor issues don't seem relevant here. It's more about the device (keyboard) not functioning post-resume, which points towards **peripherals** as the category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue where the keyboard stops working after saving and loading a VM state in QEMU for PowerPC. This problem is related to how the keyboard input is handled during the save/load process, likely affecting the peripheral device emulation.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1032 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1032
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..65fbf17b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1032
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user mentioned that there's a slow random performance issue with virtio-blk. Let me break down what I know.
+
+First, virtio is a virtualization technology used in KVM for efficient communication between the guest OS and the host. Virtio devices are designed to be lightweight and paravirtualized, which should provide better performance compared to fully emulated devices.
+
+The bug report involves steps to reproduce where they set up a VM using VirtualBox but then convert it to run under QEMU. They're encountering issues where Windows 11 won't boot properly unless they manually load the viostor driver via recovery mode. After fixing that, when they run CrystalDiskMark, they experience slow and inconsistent performance.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The main issue here is with virtio-blk's performance. Since virtio-blk relates to block I/O and storage devices in virtual machines, it falls under the 'peripherals' category because virtio devices are considered as peripheral interfaces in the virtualized environment. The problem isn't related to translation issues or assembly lowering, but rather hardware device performance within the VM.
+
+So, the appropriate classification is peripherals.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue with slow and inconsistent performance of the virtio-blk device under QEMU. Since this relates directly to the block storage peripheral in a virtualized environment, the category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1042654 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1042654
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..55e8ac2b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1042654
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure this out. The user provided a bug report about QEMU where floppy disks and network aren't working on NT 3.1 using Qemu 1.2 rc1. They mentioned setting the AMD PCnet adapter correctly but it's not functioning.
+
+First, I need to categorize this into one of the given options: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issues here are floppy disks and network not working. Floppy disks typically relate to hardware devices, specifically storage peripherals. The network issue could be related to the network adapter, which is a device as well. Since both problems involve hardware emulation in QEMU, they likely fall under the 'peripherals' category because it's about how QEMU handles input/output devices.
+
+Looking at the options, 'device' is too generic, and 'network' specifically addresses only one part of the problem. However, since floppies are also a type of device, but network is another, maybe 'peripherals' is broader and covers both storage and networking hardware.
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions issues with floppy disks and network functionality in QEMU. Floppy drives are peripherals, and network adapters (like PCnet) are devices. Since the problem affects both, the most fitting category is 'peripherals'.
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1048 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1048
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b9fb7c48
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1048
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to classify this bug report. The issue is with the USB OHCI controller not resetting HccaPad1 after a frame number update. From what I remember, OHCI stands for Open Host Controller Interface, which is part of USB controllers.
+
+The problem description mentions that when the framenumber is incremented, HccaPad1 should be set to zero according to the OHCI spec (4.4.1). It seems like this isn't happening in QEMU's code, as seen in hcd-ohci.c around line 1201.
+
+Looking at the ReactOS part, they're using HccaPad1 to check if the controller is running, and it fails because of this bug. So the issue relates to how the OHCI hardware state is managed.
+
+Now, considering the possible categories: it's not a mistranslation or assembly lowering issue because it's about hardware behavior. It also doesn't fall under common ones like network, device (maybe), but more precisely, it's about the USB controller's functionality. 
+
+The bug affects how the OHCI controller operates, which is part of the peripherals since USB controllers are peripherals. Therefore, I think 'peripherals' is the most appropriate category here.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1058 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1058
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..90dce529
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1058
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The user is reporting an issue where NetBSD Sparc 8.2 OS doesn't accept keyboard input when using the -nographic flag. They mentioned that they can see the characters being typed, but pressing Enter does nothing. This specifically affects NetBSD, while other VMs like Solaris work fine with the same setup.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce, it's running on RHEL 8.6 and also tested on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. The problem occurs when using -nographic, which suggests a graphical or console-related issue since that flag usually disables the graphical output, relying instead on serial input/output.
+
+Now, considering the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about keyboard input not being recognized. Since they're using -nographic, the VM is likely in a headless mode, so it's probably using a serial console for input/output. The problem could be related to how QEMU handles keyboard events in this mode.
+
+Looking at possible categories: peripherals might fit because keyboards are peripheral devices. Alternatively, device could also apply since it's an input device issue. However, the error seems specific to the way the VM is handling keyboard input under certain conditions (like -nographic), which might be related to how QEMU emulates the keyboard or handles events.
+
+Another angle: Could this be a network-related issue? Probably not, because it's about local keyboard input, not network communication. So categories like socket or network don't seem relevant here.
+
+It could also relate to the graphical interface since -nographic affects the display setup, but the problem is more about input than output. So graphic might not be the best fit.
+
+Considering all this, peripherals seems the most appropriate category because it's related to how QEMU handles keyboard (a peripheral device) input in a specific mode.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/106 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/106
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..453994bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/106
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "qemu-git gravis ultrasound not working". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, let's parse the bug report. It mentions QEMU-GIT and two terms: "gravis ultrasound". I know that Gravis is a manufacturer of joysticks and other input devices. The Ultrasound might refer to a specific model or product. So it seems like this is related to an input device not working correctly under QEMU.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'peripherals' would cover devices like joysticks, which are input peripherals. Other categories like 'device' could also fit, but 'peripherals' is more specific to input/output devices such as mice, keyboards, and joysticks.
+
+I don't see any indication that this is related to translation errors (mistranslation), assembly issues, or other areas like network or graphic problems. It's about a device not functioning, so peripherals is the best fit.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1080086 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1080086
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5b9e41a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1080086
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to classify the given bug report into one of the specified categories for QEMU. Let me go through it step by step.
+
+The issue is about the RTC (Real-Time Clock) breaking when the SET bit in Register B is enabled. From what I understand, when the SET flag is on, the function rtc_set_time isn't called. This causes the base_rtc field in RTCState to remain uninitialized. Subsequent writes then overwrite data incorrectly.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The problem seems related to hardware emulation, specifically the RTC behavior. Since the bug involves how the RTC state is handled when certain flags are set, it's likely a device-related issue. The RTC is part of the system's peripheral devices, so 'peripherals' fits here.
+</think>
+
+The bug relates to incorrect handling of the RTC in QEMU when a specific flag is enabled, causing uninitialized states and data overwrites. This pertains to hardware emulation, specifically a peripheral component.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1086745 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1086745
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b5755a0c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1086745
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the report carefully.
+
+The user mentions issues with a serial port data problem where THRE comes too early. They're using a Linux guest and host with hardware handshake. The issue is that TEMT isn't being handled properly, causing applications like simplex modems to fail during transmission.
+
+They explain that after writing data, the driver should timeout before checking if transmission is complete. Right now, it seems that GET_LSR_INFO returns true too soon, leading to the RTS being turned off early, which stops the data from being read correctly.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: Mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, or 'other'.
+
+The problem is related to serial port handling, specifically with hardware handshake signals (TEMET and THRE). This sounds like an issue with how QEMU emulates the serial port's behavior. Since it's about device emulation, especially a peripheral device like the serial port, I think 'peripherals' would be the correct category.
+
+So, the bug is in the handling of the serial port hardware handshake, which falls under peripherals.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue with the handling of hardware handshakes in QEMU's serial port emulation. This pertains to how the device (serial port) interacts with applications using hardware signals like RTS and DTR. Therefore, it falls under the 'peripherals' category.
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1090602 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1090602
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4f05314c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1090602
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The report is about QEMU and suggests adding an option to specify a USB host device by its serial number. Currently, users can only specify devices using vendor and product IDs, which isn't enough when multiple identical devices are present.
+
+Looking at the categories: 'usb-host' falls under peripherals since it's related to hardware devices connected to the system. The issue is about enhancing how these devices are specified, so it's not a translation error or assembly problem. It also doesn't fit into other specific areas like network, graphics, or kernel directly. 
+
+Therefore, the most appropriate category is 'peripherals' because it deals with USB devices and their management in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses adding an option to specify USB host devices by their serial number, which falls under the classification of peripherals since it pertains to managing hardware devices.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1094564 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1094564
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..11e8faea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1094564
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU where images used as SCSI disks aren't being read properly on macOS 10.8 using qemu-system-arm. The user provided details about their setup and the commit that introduced the issue.
+
+First, I need to figure out which category this falls into from the given list: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is about SCSI disks not being readable. Since it's related to storage devices and their interaction with QEMU, which emulates hardware, the likely category would be 'peripherals'. This makes sense because SCSI support in QEMU involves handling device emulation, which falls under the peripherals category.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1149 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1149
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b47c97b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1149
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user is talking about a problem with the implementation of Micron Xccela (MT35x) NOR Flash in `hw/block/m25p80.c`. They mention an issue with the MAN_MICRON_OCTAL entry introduced in a fork, suggesting that it's better to make it more generic as MAN_MICRON and handle octal mode through configuration registers, similar to quad mode. They also note a commit about 256 configuration registers.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is related to hardware block implementation in QEMU. The file `m25p80.c` suggests it's part of the hardware block devices, specifically flash memory emulation. The issue deals with incorrect or incomplete handling of configuration modes and manufacturer-specific implementations.
+
+This doesn't fall under user-mode mistranslation or assembly lowering. It's more about how a specific device (NOR Flash) is implemented in QEMU's hardware layer. Therefore, it relates to the peripherals category because it involves the correct functioning of hardware peripheral emulation.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/119 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/119
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5e7257f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/119
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "USB assert failure on hcd-uhci.c". Let's think about it step by step.
+
+First, the bug is related to USB and involves an assert failure in a file named hcd-uhci.c. The prefix "hcd" likely stands for Host Controller Driver, which suggests it's part of the USB controller implementation in QEMU. UHCI refers to the Universal Host Controller Interface, another clue pointing towards USB functionality.
+
+The possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Since this is about a USB issue, it's definitely not related to network, socket, or graphics. It's also not about the hypervisor itself but rather a component running under it. The failure is in hcd-uhci.c, which handles USB devices. Therefore, "peripherals" seems like the most appropriate category because USB devices are peripherals connected to the system.
+
+I don't think it's about performance or debug tools since those usually have different symptoms. Permissions might not be relevant here unless it's an access issue, but the assert failure is more likely a logic error in handling USB operations. The other categories don't fit as well.
+
+So, the category should be peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1208 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1208
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cc47799f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1208
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a description of the issue and mentioned that it's part of QEMU. They also listed possible categories like mistranslation, assembly lowering, and others.
+
+Looking at the bug report, they're talking about the Raspberry Pi 4 Model B and mention some past attempts at implementing something with links to repositories. It doesn't specify any particular error or issue type, just references previous work on QEMU patches for the Raspberry Pi 4.
+
+Hmm, so it's not pointing out a specific problem but rather referencing prior efforts. Since there's no clear indication of the bug type like mistranslation or performance issues, and it's related to hardware (Raspberry Pi), maybe 'peripherals' fits because it's about adding support for a specific device.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1210212 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1210212
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..db118ad3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1210212
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that when they run QEMU with the -serial option using mon:vc, it causes a core dump. Specifically, running something like "-serial null -serial mon:vc" leads to a segmentation fault.
+
+First, I need to recall what each category means. Looking at the options:
+
+- Mistranslation is about incorrect semantic mapping from source to target.
+- Assembly lowering relates to assembly code issues.
+- Other is for anything that doesn't fit elsewhere.
+- Device probably involves hardware device emulation.
+- Graphic would be related to graphics handling.
+- Socket might involve network socket issues.
+- Network is broader than just sockets, maybe related to networking in general.
+- KVM is about kernel-based virtualization.
+- Boot is about the boot process.
+- VNC relates to remote desktop access.
+- Debug is about debugging features.
+- Files and permissions are self-explanatory.
+- Performance is about slow performance issues.
+- Kernel might refer to OS kernel interactions, but in QEMU context, possibly related to hypervisor or device emulation.
+- Peripherals would be about hardware devices like serial ports, USB, etc.
+- Hypervisor refers to the management of virtual machines.
+
+The bug occurs when using the -serial option with "mon:vc". The monitor is part of QEMU's monitoring functionality. When trying to attach it to a virtual console, it crashes. 
+
+I think this might be related to how the serial port is being emulated or connected to the monitor. Since mon:vc suggests connecting the monitor to a virtual console, maybe there's an issue with how the serial device is handled. So this points towards a problem with peripherals, specifically the serial port emulation.
+
+Looking at the categories, "peripherals" seems like the right fit because it's about hardware devices (like serial) and their interaction within QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a core dump when using the -serial option with mon:vc, which relates to serial port emulation. This falls under peripherals.
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1232 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1232
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a4e92482
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1232
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The user is reporting an issue with AArch64 virt where they can't write to memory related to GICv3. They mention that the base address in the generated dtb is 0x0800_0000, which seems correct as checked by reading gicd_typer. However, when trying to configure GICD registers like gicd_ctlr, the value doesn't change and remains default.
+
+They also tried using gdb's `set` command to modify this address, but it didn't work. The user notes that without enabling MMU, they attempted to write directly to the memory as soon as the machine starts, which should be straightforward but isn't working.
+
+The key here is that writes to GICv3 registers aren't taking effect, and even gdb can't modify them. Since this involves hardware-specific components like the GIC (which handles interrupt controllers), it points towards a problem with how QEMU emulates peripheral devices.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'peripherals' makes sense because GIC is part of the device emulation in QEMU. The issue isn't related to translation or assembly lowering, nor does it fall under other broader categories like performance or kernel. It's specifically about hardware peripherals not functioning as expected.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue with writing to registers of the GICv3 distributor in QEMU, which is part of device emulation.
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1241569 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1241569
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f18ed855
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1241569
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm looking at this bug report where the QEMU Alpha emulator's console is unresponsive. The user created a VM with basic setup—1 SCSI disc, 1 SCSI CDROM, and 1GB memory. When they try to enter commands like "show device," nothing happens except echoing back. Booting an OS isn't possible either.
+
+First, I need to categorize this bug according to the given options: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is with the console being unresponsive. The user isn't getting any output from commands except for echoing, and they can't boot an OS. Since this affects the input/output functionality during the VM's operation, it's related to how QEMU handles the console interface. 
+
+Looking at the categories, "console" issues might fall under input/output or peripherals. But none of the options directly mention "console." The closest categories are device (general hardware devices) or perhaps network/socket if the problem is with communication between host and guest. However, this seems more about user interaction rather than networking.
+
+Alternatively, it could be a boot issue since the user can't boot an OS, but the main symptom is the unresponsive console during the QEMU session. This points towards a problem in how QEMU handles input/output, which might relate to the device emulation or peripherals.
+
+Considering the options, "peripherals" seems appropriate because the console is part of the I/O devices emulated by QEMU. If it's not responding correctly, it's an issue with the peripheral devices' handling.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where the console in a QEMU Alpha VM becomes unresponsive when trying to execute commands. Since this affects the interaction with the virtual machine's input/output interface, which is handled by QEMU's emulation of peripherals, the appropriate category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1243 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1243
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0e825a1d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1243
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "Floating-point-exception in ide_set_sector". Let's break it down.
+
+First, the error is a floating-point exception, which usually means an issue with how floating-point operations are handled. Now, looking at where it occurs: "ide_set_sector". IDE refers to Integrated Drive Electronics, which relates to disk drives or storage devices.
+
+So, the bug happens in a function that's part of the IDE subsystem. Since IDE deals with peripherals like hard drives, this likely falls under the 'peripherals' category. I don't see any connection to things like graphics, network, or VNC here. It's more about hardware device interaction rather than system performance or kernel issues.
+
+Therefore, the correct classification is 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug occurs in a function related to IDE (disk drive), which falls under peripherals.
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1247478 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1247478
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d307f029
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1247478
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The issue is about USB passthrough causing data corruption in mass storage devices when used with a Windows 7 guest. Specifically, it happens during writes using bulk transfers of sizes 20480 or 4096 bytes. The pattern repeats every 20480 bytes, and the last 4096 bytes of each transfer are corrupted. Interestingly, this doesn't happen when using Linux as the guest.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem involves USB passthrough and data corruption during writes. USB is a hardware peripheral, so "peripherals" seems relevant here. The issue isn't related to translation errors (mistranslation), nor does it seem to be about assembly or network issues. It's more about how the virtualization handles the USB device.
+
+The bug occurs when passing through USB devices via host-libusb, which suggests a problem with how QEMU interacts with hardware peripherals. Since attaching via hw/usb/dev-storage works fine, it points towards an issue specific to the passthrough method used in the Windows guest environment.
+
+Therefore, the most fitting category is "peripherals" because it's about handling USB devices, which are peripherals of the system.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1252270 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1252270
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e9cf401a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1252270
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is encountering an issue while installing NT4 on a MIPS Magnum using QEMU. They provided the error message which mentions an assertion failure in `hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c` at line 1577. The specific assertion is about `req->cmd.mode != SCSI_XFER_NONE`. 
+
+So, looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The error seems related to SCSI operations during disk formatting. The assertion is in `scsi-bus.c`, which suggests it's dealing with the SCSI bus handling. SCSI relates to storage devices, so this might fall under 'peripherals'. Alternatively, since it's an assertion failure in QEMU's code when interacting with the SCSI device (like hard disks), it could also be a 'device' issue.
+
+But considering that the problem arises during disk formatting and involves SCSI commands, which are handled by the SCSI bus emulation in QEMU. The error is about the mode of the command being NONE, implying an unexpected state in the SCSI request handling. This seems more specific to how QEMU manages peripheral devices, particularly storage peripherals. 
+
+So I think 'peripherals' is the most accurate category here because it's related to the interaction with the virtual SCSI device.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an assertion failure during SCSI bus handling when formatting a disk during NT4 installation on MIPS Magnum using QEMU. This points to an issue in the SCSI device emulation, which falls under peripherals.
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1254 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1254
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..368361e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1254
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The bug is in hw/misc/edu.c, specifically in the edu_check_range() function. The issue arises with boundary conditions when size2 is 0 or equal to size1. So, it's related to checking ranges and handling edge cases correctly.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is in hardware-related code (hw/misc/edu.c), which falls under peripherals because EDU devices are typically peripheral devices. The issue isn't about translation or assembly lowering; it's more about incorrect range checking leading to off-by-one errors, which affects the device's operation.
+
+Therefore, the correct category is peripherals.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an off-by-one error in hardware code related to EDU (Educational) devices, which falls under peripherals.
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1255303 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1255303
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..32fbb2f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1255303
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have to classify this bug report about QEMU where ALSA underruns occur when using the sound cards ac97 or hda. The user is running QEMU version 1.6.1 on a Gentoo Linux system with a Windows 7 guest OS.
+
+First, let me understand what's happening. The error messages mention ALSA lib and underruns. ALSA is the Advanced Linux Sound Architecture, which handles audio in Linux. An underrun means that the application (in this case, QEMU) didn't provide data to the sound card quickly enough, causing a disruption in audio.
+
+The user tried two different sound cards: ac97 works fine, but hda causes garbled sound. The command line includes -soundhw ac97 or -soundhw hda. So the issue is specific to how QEMU handles the HDA (High Definition Audio) device emulation.
+
+I need to look at the possible categories given: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is related to audio in QEMU. Since it's about sound card emulation leading to underruns and garbled audio, this falls under the category of 'peripherals'. Because HDA is a type of peripheral device (sound card), and the issue is how QEMU emulates or handles that device.
+
+I don't think it's 'device' because that might be too generic. It's more specific to peripherals. Also, since it's about audio processing within QEMU, which interacts with the host's ALSA, but the bug is in QEMU's handling of HDA emulation.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/126 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/126
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..85e07a30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/126
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report: "Mouse stops working in Windows guest". Let me think about how to approach this.
+
+First, I need to understand what each category means based on the list provided. The categories are:
+
+- mistranslation
+- assembly
+- other
+- device
+- graphic
+- socket
+- network
+- KVM
+- boot
+- vnc
+- debug
+- files
+- permissions
+- performance
+- kernel
+- peripherals
+- hypervisor
+
+The bug is about the mouse stopping in a Windows guest. So, I'm considering which category this falls under.
+
+"Mouse stops working" sounds like an input device issue. Input devices are typically handled by the system's device drivers or related to hardware peripherals. Since it's in a virtual machine (Windows guest), it's likely a problem with how QEMU handles input devices.
+
+Looking at the categories, "peripherals" seems appropriate because mice and other input devices are considered peripherals. The issue is about the mouse not working, which relates to the handling of peripheral devices in the hypervisor or within the guest OS.
+
+I don't think it's related to network or socket issues because those would pertain more to connectivity rather than input devices. Graphic could be a possibility if it were a display problem, but here the issue is specifically with the mouse movement or functionality.
+
+So, considering all this, "peripherals" seems like the correct category.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1263 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1263
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5492f429
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1263
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "arm/imx EPIT timer interrupt does not fire properly on sabrelight". Let me break it down.
+
+First, looking at the components mentioned. The bug is related to the ARM IMX platform's EPIT timer. The EPIT is a real-time clock (RTC) and timer controller in some i.MX processors. It's used for generating interrupts based on time events.
+
+The issue here is that the timer interrupt isn't firing as expected on the Sabrelight board, which is a specific hardware setup using QEMU as an emulator or hypervisor. The problem lies within the QEMU codebase, specifically in how it handles the EPIT timer's interrupt functionality.
+
+Now, considering the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Since this is about a hardware component (the timer) not functioning correctly in an emulated environment, it's related to how QEMU handles device emulation. The EPIT timer is part of the device peripherals on the target machine. Therefore, when QEMU isn't emulating its behavior correctly, it's categorized under 'peripherals'.
+
+I don't think it's a mistranslation issue because that pertains more to source-to-target mapping in user-mode. It's also not directly related to network, socket, or other listed categories. The problem is specific to hardware device emulation within QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The bug involves the EPIT timer, which is part of the hardware peripherals. Therefore, it falls under 'peripherals'.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1272796 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1272796
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..784f9b99
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1272796
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU. The user mentioned issues with Windows 98 First Edition not booting properly in a Debian SID x86 environment using QEMU. They tried different configurations and options but couldn't get it working.
+
+First, looking at the problem: when they try to boot Win98, it gets stuck on the boot screen. Installation works fine, but after that, it freezes. Also, with sound hardware (GUS), there are problems in both QEMU versions 1.7 and 1.6.2. In version 1.6.2, the GUS isn't recognized even when using DOS drivers, and when using SoundBlaster 16, there's a warning about I/O thread spinning too much.
+
+The user tried different machine types (-M option) but nothing worked, so it's not a simple configuration issue. The sound problems seem persistent across versions.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: hypervisor, device, graphic, network, etc. Since this is related to hardware emulation within QEMU, which functions as a hypervisor, I think 'hypervisor' might be relevant here. However, the specific issues are with peripherals like sound devices. Peripherals are handled in QEMU as separate components.
+
+The main problems seem to be with device (sound) recognition and performance issues due to the I/O thread spinning. The freezing on boot could also relate to how hardware is emulated, possibly a device not being properly recognized or causing a hang.
+
+So, considering that the sound devices aren't working correctly and there's an issue with the I/O thread, which affects performance, this might fall under 'peripherals' because it's related to the emulation of specific hardware devices. Alternatively, since QEMU is a hypervisor, maybe 'hypervisor', but the primary issues are more about device emulation.
+
+I think 'peripherals' makes more sense here because the problems are with how the sound devices and possibly other peripherals are being emulated.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes issues primarily related to hardware device emulation within QEMU. The problems include sound device recognition and performance issues, which fall under the category of peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1282 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1282
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..523d0a11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1282
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a list of possible categories, and I need to pick the right one based on the description.
+
+The bug is about an "sdhci: DMA reentrancy issue leads to an infinite loop." So, sdhci stands for Secure Digital Host Controller Interface. It's related to handling SD cards in QEMU. The problem occurs when transferring multiple blocks without checking if the DMA-write buffer pointer overlaps with the MMIO region, which can cause a denial of service due to an infinite loop and CPU consumption.
+
+Looking at the categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. Sdhci is a controller for SD cards, which falls under peripherals because it's handling input/output devices connected to the system. So the category should be 'peripherals'.
+
+I think that makes sense because the issue is with how the DMA and MMIO regions are being handled by the SD card controller in QEMU. It's not related to translation issues (mistranslation), assembly code (assembly), or something else like network, graphic, etc.
+</think>
+
+The bug relates to a device controller (SDHCI) causing an infinite loop during data transfers, which falls under peripherals.
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1285508 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1285508
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..97b7f85b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1285508
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned a problem with the mouse cursor being invisible when using QEMU. They specified they're using an Ubuntu live system and provided details about how they booted it using KVM.
+
+Looking at the categories, I see "mouse" isn't listed, but "peripherals" is close since a mouse is a peripheral device. Alternatively, could it be related to graphics? Maybe not directly, because the issue is with the cursor rather than rendering. Another option is "device," which might be too vague.
+
+Wait, the bug report involves the mouse cursor specifically, so it's likely under peripherals as that's more about input devices. However, I remember that in QEMU, problems with hardware like mice are often categorized under device or maybe even KVM specifics since they're related to virtualization of hardware. But KVM is more about hypervisor aspects, not the individual device behavior.
+
+Hmm, perhaps "peripherals" is the best fit here because it's an input device issue within the VM. Alternatively, if it's a graphical display problem with cursor rendering, it might fall under "graphic." But since the cursor isn't showing up at all, maybe it's more about device interaction. So I'm leaning towards "peripherals."
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where the mouse cursor is invisible when using QEMU with an Ubuntu live system. This suggests a problem with how the mouse (a peripheral device) is being handled by QEMU. The issue isn't related to translation, assembly lowering, or other non-device-specific areas. It's specifically about the behavior of a hardware device within the virtual machine.
+
+**Step-by-Step Explanation:**
+1. **Identify the Problem:** The cursor not showing up indicates an input device (mouse) issue.
+2. **Categorize the Area:** Since it's related to hardware interaction, "peripherals" is appropriate.
+3. **Exclude Other Categories:** It doesn't fall under assembly, network, or hypervisor directly.
+
+**Answer:**
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1289788 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1289788
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bb7df320
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1289788
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so the user is asking me to classify a bug report from QEMU into one of several categories. The possible categories are things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, it's about MIDI access causing Windows NT to hang when using QEMU 1.7.x. The user mentions that enabling adlib or the es1370 built-in synth causes this issue. They've tested with bisecting and think the problem was introduced in 1.7.0 development.
+
+Hmm, so I need to figure out which category fits best. MIDI access relates to sound cards or audio devices. In QEMU terms, that would be emulated peripherals, specifically the sound card device. So 'peripherals' seems like the right category here because it's about hardware emulation issues.
+
+I don't think it's a translation issue since the problem is with device interaction rather than code generation. It's not related to networking or sockets either. The bug is in how QEMU handles MIDI through the sound card, so peripherals fit best.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1305 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1305
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ff5b5663
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1305
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The user described an issue where after migrating a VM using usbredir, the USB drive letter changes because the device is unplugged and re-plugged. They mentioned that the device state isn't maintained post-migration and referenced another bug about chardev reconnection.
+
+Looking at the categories: The problem involves USB devices in the VM and their behavior during migration. Since USB redirection (usbredir) is a feature related to peripherals, this falls under the 'peripherals' category. It's not a translation issue or performance-related but rather an interaction with hardware devices.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1313816 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1313816
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ab6c9aee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1313816
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the report carefully.
+
+The user is talking about issues with sound devices in QEMU when using ALSA or PulseAudio along with XMMS2. They mention that either QEMU or XMMS2 can play sound, but not both at the same time. Also, they noticed that when using PulseAudio with certain flags (-k and --start), QEMU can't play sound.
+
+They suggest that QEMU should open the sound device when needed and close it when no longer necessary. They also mention that closing and reopening the device helps recover from errors.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is related to sound devices not working correctly under certain conditions. This sounds like a problem with how QEMU handles the audio device or Peripheral devices in general. Since it's about managing the sound device (opening and closing) and compatibility with PulseAudio, which is an audio server, this falls under peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1323 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1323
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..edf2d1ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1323
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU where the keyboard isn't working in the CD boot menu. The user can't input any keys while the menu is displayed. Let me break down what's happening here.
+
+First, the steps to reproduce involve using `qemu-system-x86_64` with a specific ISO image. When the boot menu appears, no key presses are registered. This issue occurs with multiple ISOs but doesn't happen when using provided EDK2 firmware or QEMU version 7.1.0.
+
+So, what's going on? The keyboard input isn't being handled correctly during the CD boot process. Since it works with a specific firmware and an older QEMU version, it suggests that a regression might have been introduced in the current build.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc., I'm thinking about which category fits best. The keyboard is a hardware peripheral, so "peripherals" seems relevant here. It's related to input devices not functioning as expected within the emulator.
+
+I don't think it's a mistranslation or assembly issue because those relate more to code translation and execution rather than device interaction. Similarly, performance issues would manifest differently, like lag or slowness, not complete lack of response.
+
+The problem is specifically with keyboard input during the boot menu, which falls under hardware emulation. Therefore, "peripherals" is the most appropriate category.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1323758 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1323758
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f0ae416b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1323758
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user is experiencing an issue where their mouse stops working when they connect a USB storage device in their QEMU setup. Specifically, when they pass the USB device through and then switch away from the VNC viewer on the host machine, the mouse ceases to function. It works again only after removing the USB device or rebooting the guest.
+
+First, I'll look at the possible categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is related to USB devices and mouse functionality within a virtual machine. Since the problem arises when connecting a storage device via USB and involves VNC interaction, it's likely not a straightforward translation or assembly error. It seems more related to how QEMU handles USB devices and interacts with the host's display or input systems.
+
+Looking at the categories, "peripherals" makes sense because the mouse is a peripheral device, and the issue occurs when using a USB storage device (another peripheral). The problem could be in how QEMU manages resource allocation or handling of these devices, possibly leading to conflicts when switching focus in the VNC client. Alternatively, it might be an issue with how VNC interacts with the host's input drivers when other devices are attached.
+
+Considering that the mouse stops working specifically after interacting with the USB storage device and when the VNC viewer is minimized, this points towards a problem in how QEMU handles USB device passthrough or perhaps resource management within the hypervisor environment. However, "peripherals" seems more directly related to the hardware devices involved (USB mouse and storage) rather than the hypervisor itself.
+
+I don't think it's a network issue because there's no mention of connectivity problems beyond the mouse input. Similarly, graphic issues would likely manifest differently, perhaps with display problems rather than input failure.
+
+So, putting it all together, the most fitting category is "peripherals" since it involves USB devices and their interaction with the VM environment causing hardware-related issues.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to how QEMU handles USB devices and peripherals. The mouse stopping after connecting a storage device suggests a problem with peripheral management in the hypervisor.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1332234 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1332234
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fec2d5b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1332234
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the category for this bug report about QEMU not reading real CDROMs anymore. Let's see... The user mentioned that when they use the -cdrom /dev/cdrom option with QEMU v2.0.0, it doesn't work. Previously, in versions before 1.5, it worked fine.
+
+First, I need to look at the possible categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about CDROM not being read. So it's related to hardware devices that QEMU emulates or interacts with. The user is using a real CDROM connected via /dev/cdrom. This suggests the problem might be in how QEMU handles block devices or storage peripherals.
+
+Looking at the output from "info block", it shows ide1-cd0 as /dev/cdrom, but perhaps there's an issue with how QEMU accesses this device. Maybe there's a change in how CDROMs are handled in v2.0.0 that broke compatibility.
+
+Possible categories related to devices include 'device' and 'peripherals'. Since CDROM is a peripheral device, the category might be 'peripherals'. Alternatively, it could relate to block devices, but 'block' isn't one of the options here. So between 'device' and 'peripherals', I think 'peripherals' fits better because it's specifically about the CDROM hardware interaction.
+
+Another angle: if this is a problem with device drivers or how QEMU interfaces with the host's CDROM drive, that might fall under the broader 'device' category. But given the options, 'peripherals' seems more precise for devices like CDROMs.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue where QEMU can no longer read from a real CDROM after updating to version 2.0.0. The user notes that previous versions worked correctly, and upon checking the block device information, it shows the CDROM is recognized but not functioning properly.
+
+Considering the categories, this issue relates to how QEMU interacts with hardware peripherals, specifically the CDROM drive. Therefore, the most appropriate category is 'peripherals'.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1353346 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1353346
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0487f5db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1353346
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, it's about handling software-triggered interrupts in ARMv7-M within QEMU. The specific file mentioned is armv7m_nvic.c, which deals with interrupt controllers for ARM M-series cores. The issue is that writing a zero to the STIR register isn't behaving correctly, causing unexpected behavior in the emulation.
+
+The user points out that using gic_set_pending_private() might be incorrect and suggests using armv7m_nvic_set_pending() instead. They also mention that the IRQ number needs adjustment by adding 16. This seems like a problem with how interrupts are being handled, specifically related to interrupt routing or NVIC configuration.
+
+Considering the categories, 'peripherals' fits because it's dealing with hardware peripherals (interrupt controller) and their correct handling in QEMU. The issue isn't about translation errors or performance; it's more about incorrect behavior in device emulation.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses an issue with how software-triggered interrupts are handled in ARMv7-M within QEMU, specifically pointing to a problem in the NVIC implementation. This is related to hardware peripheral handling, making 'peripherals' the appropriate category.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1363 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1363
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1cc87bd6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1363
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. The categories are mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The problem described is about TriCore registers not working when writing to them. Reading works fine, but writing doesn't. The user suspects it's a QEMU issue because even third-party GDB clients face the same problem. 
+
+Looking at the categories: Mistranslation refers to incorrect semantic mapping in user-mode assembly, which might affect how instructions are translated or lowered into machine code. But here, the issue is specifically about register writes not functioning correctly, which relates more to hardware interaction.
+
+Device and peripherals seem relevant because TriCore likely involves device-specific hardware emulation. Registers often pertain to device operations. So if writing to registers isn't working, it's possibly an issue with how QEMU handles device peripheral interactions.
+
+Other categories like network or socket don't fit here since the problem is about register writes, not communication protocols. Boot and vnc are more about system startup or remote access, which doesn't apply. Debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel—none of these seem directly related to the specific issue with TriCore registers.
+
+So, putting it together, the bug is likely under 'peripherals' because it's about how QEMU interacts with device-specific hardware features (registers in this case).
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1366363 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1366363
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9cd3621c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1366363
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report in QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's break down what the user mentioned.
+
+The user started by saying "qemu-git gravis ultrasound not working." So they're using QEMU and having trouble with the Gravis Ultrasound sound card. They provided more details about their setup: QEMU version 2.1.50, DOS622 as the guest OS, and Windows 3.11. 
+
+Looking at the build parameters, they have CONFIG_GUS=y, which means they're enabling support for the GUS (Gravis Ultrasound Sound) in the configuration. When starting QEMU, they include -soundhw gus,pcspk, so both GUS and PC speaker are enabled.
+
+The issue is that the installer of the GUS driver 4.11 doesn't recognize the card. Additionally, conscan shows that IO ports 220-240 are already in use, causing a conflict because the synth base (probably where the sound card expects to be) isn't available there.
+
+So, the problem seems related to how QEMU is emulating the GUS sound card and managing the IO ports. Since it's about hardware emulation, specifically the sound card, I'm thinking this falls under "peripherals." 
+
+The categories provided include things like network, graphic, device, etc., and peripherals would encompass sound cards as they are devices attached to a computer that aren't graphics or network related.
+
+Therefore, the classification should be "peripherals."
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1369347 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1369347
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d9253ec1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1369347
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify the given bug report. The user is reporting an issue with QEMU on Mac OS X where they can't pass through a USB device to their guest system. They're using qemu-system-arm version 1.7.1 installed via Homebrew. 
+
+The error message they receive is: "qemu-system-arm: -device usb-host,vendorid=0x148f,productid=0x5370: Parameter 'driver' expects device type." 
+
+First, I need to understand what each part of the bug report is indicating. The user is attempting to use the USB passthrough feature in QEMU. They've included the specific USB dongle they're trying to pass through and the command line arguments they're using. The error suggests that the 'driver' parameter expects a device type but isn't receiving one, which probably means there's an issue with how the USB host device is being handled.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The bug report is about passing a USB device to a guest, so this seems related to hardware devices and their handling within QEMU. The error message points to an issue with the 'usb-host' device type. In QEMU, '-device usb-host' is used for USB passthrough. If the driver expects a certain device type but isn't getting it, that suggests a problem in how the USB device is being handled or recognized.
+
+Considering the categories, "peripherals" makes sense here because USB devices are considered peripherals. Alternatively, it could be under "device," which is a broader category, but since it's specifically about USB passthrough for a peripheral device, "peripherals" seems more precise.
+
+I don't think it's related to mistranslation or assembly lowering because the issue is with device handling rather than code translation or assembly. It's also not about network, socket, or graphic issues directly. The error isn't performance-related or a kernel issue but is specific to device passthrough. 
+
+So, the most appropriate category would be "peripherals" since it's about connecting and configuring hardware devices for the guest system.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1377095 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1377095
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..50f37bd6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1377095
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure this out. The user is reporting a bug with QEMU related to USB pass-through for a printer. So, when the guest VM starts, the printer is connected and works if it's on. But if the host turns off the printer, both the host and the VM stop showing it. Then, when the printer is turned back on, the host recognizes it again, but the VM doesn't. This only happens with QEMU 2.1.0; it worked in a previous version like 1.0.
+
+First, I need to categorize this bug. The possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the issue, it's about USB devices not reattaching after being turned off and on. USB pass-through is a feature that allows devices connected to the host to be used by the guest VM. The problem occurs when the device is disconnected (turned off) and then reconnected (turned on). The guest doesn't recognize it again, which suggests an issue with how QEMU handles hot-plugging or device reconnection.
+
+The user mentioned using KVM, so this relates to virtualization. USB devices are peripherals in a VM setup. So the category should be related to handling peripherals. "Peripheral" is one of the categories listed. 
+
+I don't think it's a network issue because it's about USB specifically. It's not a graphic or socket problem either. It's also not about kernel, hypervisor, or performance issues directly; it's more about device management within the VM.
+
+So, putting it all together, this is a peripherals-related bug because it's about the handling of a USB device in the guest VM when the device is disconnected and reconnected.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1377163 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1377163
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..133b3a01
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1377163
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me start by understanding what the issue is.
+
+The user reported that when using a specific command line with QEMU-KVM involving USB devices, it doesn't automatically add new devices that appear on the host USB bus while QEMU is running. The command they provided includes options for a USB EHCI controller and a host USB device on a particular bus (hostbus=3). They mention that initially, all devices on that bus are added, but any new devices that get plugged in later aren't automatically detected by QEMU; the user has to add them manually.
+
+Now, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. I need to pick one that best fits this bug.
+
+First, "mistranslation" relates to incorrect mapping in the code from source to target, which doesn't seem relevant here because it's about device handling, not semantic translation. "Assembly" is about assembly lowering, so probably not either.
+
+The issue is with USB devices and hotplugging, specifically related to how QEMU handles host USB buses dynamically. The problem isn't with the initial setup but with dynamic addition of devices while running, which implies it's an issue with device management or handling in QEMU.
+
+"Device" seems like a possible category because it directly relates to hardware devices being handled by the emulator. "Peripherals" could also be considered since USB devices are peripherals, but "device" might be more general and appropriate here. Alternatively, considering that this is related to KVM (since they're using qemu-kvm), but the issue isn't with KVM itself but how QEMU handles host USB buses.
+
+Looking at other categories like "network," which relates to network devices; "graphic" for display adapters; "socket" and "files" for I/O; "permissions," "performance," "kernel," etc. None of these seem as relevant as "device" or "peripherals."
+
+Wait, but perhaps "other" could be a category if none of the others fit perfectly. However, since USB devices fall under hardware peripherals, "peripherals" might be more precise here.
+
+Alternatively, in some cases, bugs related to hotplugging are categorized under device management or even hypervisor issues, as hypervisors manage hardware resources. But I think "device" is still a better fit because it's about handling specific hardware devices and their dynamic addition.
+
+So after considering all options, the most appropriate category seems to be "peripherals." However, another perspective: since the problem is about dynamically adding host USB devices while running QEMU, which involves device hotplugging and management, perhaps "device" is more accurate because it's about how QEMU manages devices in general.
+
+Wait, but let me think again. The bug is about not automatically detecting new USB devices on the host bus during runtime. This relates to how QEMU handles host USB devices, which falls under the "usb" or "peripherals" category. However, looking at the categories listed, I don't see a specific "usb" category; instead, "device" and "peripherals" are more general.
+
+Wait, perhaps the correct category is actually "other." But no, that seems too vague since it's a specific issue with USB devices.
+
+Alternatively, maybe "hypervisor," but that usually refers to management of virtualization aspects rather than device handling. Hmm.
+
+I think I need to decide between "device" and "peripherals." Given that the problem is about adding host USB devices dynamically, which is a hardware peripheral issue, perhaps "peripherals" is more accurate. However, in some contexts, all hardware devices are considered under "device."
+
+Wait, looking back at the list: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. Since this is related to host USB devices and their management, I think it's best categorized under "peripherals." But wait, maybe the correct category isn't listed here. Wait, no— the categories given are specific ones.
+
+Alternatively, perhaps "device" is the intended category for such issues because it's about device handling in QEMU. The user is dealing with devices not being added when new ones appear on the host bus while running, so that's a device management issue.
+
+I think I'll go with "peripherals" since USB falls under peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/138 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/138
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..76753f17
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/138
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "Exclude keys from grab". The user provided possible categories including 'mistranslation', 'assembly', and others like 'device', 'graphic', etc.
+
+First, let's understand what "Exclude keys from grab" might mean. It likely refers to a situation where certain keys are not being captured or handled correctly by the system, possibly in an input handling context. Since QEMU is often used for emulation, especially of hardware devices and user interfaces, this could relate to how events are managed.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'input' isn't listed, but maybe it's related to 'peripherals'. Peripherals would include devices like keyboards or mice that handle input. Alternatively, if it's about the graphical interface, 'graphic' might be relevant because the display handling could affect key grab behavior.
+
+But another angle: in QEMU, when running a virtual machine, sometimes keys are grabbed by the host system instead of being passed to the VM. This issue would likely be under the 'input' category if it were available, but since it's not listed, I have to find the closest match. Since input devices fall under peripherals, maybe that's the category.
+
+Alternatively, could this be a windowing or display issue? If keys are being grabbed by the VNC server or display, then 'graphic' might fit. But more likely, it's about how QEMU handles key events for the VM, which would tie into 'peripherals'.
+
+Wait, but another thought: sometimes these issues can relate to how the hypervisor interacts with user-space applications. If keys are being improperly handled in user-mode assembly translation, that could be 'mistranslation'. However, excluding keys from grab might not directly involve the translation layer.
+
+Alternatively, maybe it's a bug in the VNC or graphical interface where certain keys aren't being transmitted correctly, which would fall under 'graphic'.
+
+I'm torn between 'peripherals' and 'graphic'. Since "grab" typically refers to event handling by the windowing system, perhaps it's more about the display or graphic subsystem. But if it's related to hardware devices like a keyboard, then peripherals is better.
+
+Given that QEMU handles input through device emulators, which are part of peripherals, I think 'peripherals' is the appropriate category here.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1381846 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1381846
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5e9ce994
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1381846
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem again.
+
+The user is reporting that data sent to the parallel port in the guest OS is getting lost when the host buffer fills up. They mention that QEMU writes characters to the chardev but drops them if a write fails with EAGAIN, without initiating flow control via BUSY and ACK signals back to the guest. This causes data loss if the host buffer is too small or if the connected hardware is slow.
+
+They noticed this issue when using a DOS program with the command line option `-parallel /dev/usb/lp0`. They also mention that they can work around it by buffering via a pipe but consider this a general problem. They suggest wiring up the readiness of the output chardev to the parallel port's ACK and BUSY lines, and signaling an ISA interrupt.
+
+Now, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue seems to be related to how QEMU handles I/O operations on a parallel port. The problem arises when data is sent and the buffer overflows, leading to dropped data. This affects the communication between the guest OS's device (parallel port) and the host's hardware (USB printer in this case). 
+
+The user is talking about flow control mechanisms (ACK and BUSY lines), which are part of the parallel port communication protocol. They're suggesting that QEMU should handle these signals properly to prevent data loss, which implies a problem with how peripherals (like the parallel port) are being emulated or managed in QEMU.
+
+So, considering the categories, 'peripherals' seems appropriate because it's about handling I/O devices and their specific interactions. It's not related to networking, graphics, sockets, etc., but rather the hardware peripherals like the parallel port.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is about data loss when using a parallel port device under QEMU due to buffer overflow and improper flow control. This pertains to how QEMU handles peripheral devices, specifically their communication and I/O management.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1386197 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1386197
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..54c0a04c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1386197
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is experiencing an issue where the keyboard suddenly stops working in their VM, and it persists until they reboot the host. They've tried different setups—using VNC, spicec, SDL—and none of them work after the problem occurs. They also mention that sending keys via the console doesn't help, but when they reboot the host, everything works fine again.
+
+First, I need to look at the possible categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The user's problem is specifically related to the keyboard input stopping in the VM. They tried different display protocols (VNC, spicec), which suggests it's not isolated to one graphical interface. The fact that the issue happens when using VNC but also persists with other setups points towards a deeper problem.
+
+They mention that the host kernel is CK 3.16.3-1, and they've had this issue before with both Ubuntu and CentOS VMs. They suspect it might be related to the new kernel or NVIDIA drivers, though they've used the same kernel setup before without issues. The hardware hasn't changed, so it's likely not a hardware problem.
+
+Looking at the QEMU process details, they're using KVM with Virtio devices for network and storage. The keyboard issue happens when typing the HDD password in VNC, which suggests it might be related to how input is handled during that specific operation.
+
+The user also mentions unhandled wrmsr errors in dmesg, but they think those are irrelevant. However, these messages could indicate issues with how certain CPU instructions are being handled by the hypervisor or the host kernel.
+
+Considering all this, the problem seems to be related to input handling within the VM, which is a hardware-related issue. Since KVM is involved and the keyboard stops working, it's possibly a peripheral device problem under the hypervisor's management. The peripherals category covers issues with devices like the keyboard, mouse, etc., so that seems like the most fitting category here.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1397157 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1397157
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a07a8322
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1397157
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user reports that when using a PS2 keyboard with a multi-core Windows 7 guest OS under QEMU, there's high CPU usage and input characters display later when typing quickly. This doesn't happen if they use only one CPU or an older version of QEMU (0.12.1).
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals.
+
+The issue is related to input devices (PS2 keyboard) and CPU usage under certain conditions (multi-core setup). The problem seems to be with how QEMU handles the PS2 device in a multi-CPU environment. Since it's specific to having multiple CPUs and affects the input handling, this points towards an issue with device drivers or how peripherals are managed by QEMU.
+
+I'm considering whether it's related to performance because CPU usage is high, but the primary problem is the delayed input when typing quickly, which suggests a synchronization issue between the guest OS and host hardware. However, since the PS2 keyboard is involved and the behavior changes with different QEMU versions and CPU counts, it's more likely an issue with how devices are handled in the virtual environment.
+
+Peripherals include devices like USB, PS2, etc., so this fits under 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where using a PS2 keyboard on a multi-core Windows 7 guest OS causes high CPU usage and delayed input. This problem occurs specifically with multiple CPUs and newer QEMU versions but not with single CPU setups or older versions.
+
+Analyzing the categories, the issue is related to device handling, particularly the PS2 keyboard, which is a peripheral. The symptoms point towards an interaction between the virtualized hardware (peripheral) and the multi-CPU environment in QEMU, suggesting a problem with how peripherals are managed under certain conditions.
+
+Therefore, the appropriate category for this bug report is:
+
+**peripherals**
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1406 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1406
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..611c42ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1406
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. The categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report says: "WANTED: Schematics, Service, Tech Notes, .pdf IBM Power4 970MP/FX Apple PowerMac G5 Early/Late 2005"
+
+Hmm, at first glance, this seems a bit off. It looks like someone is asking for documentation or schematics related to specific hardware models: IBM Power4 and Apple PowerMac G5 from around 2005.
+
+I need to determine which category this falls into. Let's go through the options:
+
+- Mistranslation: This is about incorrect mapping in code translation, not relevant here.
+- Assembly: Lowering assembly code; doesn't fit.
+- Other: A catch-all category, but maybe there's a more precise one.
+- Device: Could be related to hardware devices, but this is about documentation, not device functionality.
+- Graphic: Related to graphics issues; no connection.
+- Socket: Networking sockets; irrelevant here.
+- Network: Network-related bugs; doesn't fit.
+- KVM: Kernel-based virtual machine; maybe, but the request is for hardware docs.
+- Boot: Issues with booting; not applicable.
+- VNC: Remote desktop protocol; unrelated.
+- Debug: Debugging tools or issues; no.
+- Files: Handling of files in QEMU; possible if it's about file-related bugs, but this seems more about documentation access.
+- Permissions: File permissions; maybe, but the issue isn't about accessing files due to permissions.
+- Performance: Performance issues; not relevant.
+- Kernel: Issues within the kernel; no direct link.
+- Peripherals: Hardware devices and their drivers; perhaps, since it's about hardware documentation needed for peripherals like PowerMac G5.
+- Hypervisor: Virtualization management; maybe, but again, more about documentation access.
+
+The user is seeking schematics and technical notes for specific hardware models. In QEMU, such requests might relate to adding support for new devices or ensuring correct device emulation. So, it's likely related to peripherals because they're dealing with the hardware components that QEMU emulates or interacts with.
+
+Therefore, I think "peripherals" is the most appropriate category here.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1423124 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1423124
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5d0701fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1423124
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's break down this bug report to classify it correctly. The user is using QEMU on Windows and encountered a crash when sending data via the host serial port (COM9). They tried both real and emulated COM ports with the same issue.
+
+First, I need to identify what area of QEMU this affects. Since they're dealing with serial communication, it's related to hardware devices. The specific mention of COM ports suggests it's a peripheral device issue because serial ports are peripherals connected to the system.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: there's 'device' and 'peripherals.' In this context, 'serial port' falls under peripherals as it's an external device connected for communication. So, the category here is likely 'peripherals.'
+
+I don't see any mention of translation issues or assembly lowering, so 'mistranslation' or 'assembly' isn't applicable. The crash happens during data transmission, which points more towards hardware emulation rather than other areas like network, graphic, or kernel issues.
+
+Therefore, the appropriate category is peripherals because it's about how QEMU handles the serial port device.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1453 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1453
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a0534464
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1453
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report as part of QEMU into one of the given categories. The bug is titled "Tricore: different definitions of pcxi register field." Let me break down what this might mean.
+
+First, "Tricore" refers to a specific architecture supported by QEMU. So, it's related to the target architecture or machine being emulated.
+
+The main issue here seems to be about the 'pcxi' register field having different definitions. Registers in CPUs are hardware components, so any discrepancy in their definition would likely fall under hardware emulation.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. I'm considering which of these fits best.
+
+"Device" might be a possibility since it's about hardware components, but "peripherals" seems more specific to hardware devices and their registers. Alternatively, it could relate to the CPU (kernel) or maybe even assembly translation if it's an issue in the code generation.
+
+Wait, 'pcxi' is probably a register used in the Tricore architecture. If there's a mismatch in how this register is defined or handled in QEMU, that points towards a problem in the hardware emulation part. So, it might fall under "peripherals" since registers are part of the CPU, which is a peripheral component when viewed from the system's perspective.
+
+Alternatively, could it be under "kernel"? The kernel usually handles OS-level things, but this seems more about the architecture's specifics. Maybe not.
+
+So, I think the best fit is either 'device' or 'peripherals.' Since 'pcxi' is a register field, which is part of the CPU hardware, 'peripherals' makes sense because it's about emulating hardware correctly.
+
+I should check if any other category fits better, but none seem to align as well as 'peripherals.'
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a discrepancy in the definition of a register field within QEMU for the Tricore architecture. Since registers are part of the CPU hardware and their correct emulation is crucial for proper device operation, this issue falls under the category related to hardware components.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/146 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/146
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a5561d69
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/146
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report about macOS guests reading the USB 3.0 bus as USB 2.0 in QEMU. Let me think through the possible categories.
+
+First, the issue is related to USB devices. The guest OS is misidentifying a USB 3.0 device as USB 2.0. In QEMU, this likely involves how the hypervisor handles USB devices.
+
+Looking at the categories: peripherals include things like USB, serial ports, etc., so that seems relevant. Other options like network or graphic don't fit because it's not about networking or display issues.
+
+So, the bug is probably under 'peripherals' since it's about USB device handling.
+</think>
+
+The issue pertains to how the hypervisor handles USB devices in macOS guests. Since this involves incorrect identification of a USB device type, it falls under 'peripherals'.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1463463 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1463463
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..315d4d47
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1463463
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is about PCI devices on PCI to PCI bridges not being accessible from Xen when using QEMU 2.3.0 or later. The change involved adding calls to xen_map_pcidev() at startup but not when the guest configures the bridge. This affects Xen 4.5.0 users with QEMU 2.3.0+.
+
+The main issue is related to how PCI devices are handled, specifically in the context of Xen and QEMU interaction. Since it's about device accessibility through a bridge, which is part of hardware peripheral management, the category should be 'peripherals'. Alternatively, 'device' could also fit, but 'peripherals' seems more specific here as it deals with device access via bridges.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses an issue with PCI devices and their accessibility in Xen using QEMU 2.3.0+. The problem arises from the way calls to xen_map_pcidev() are handled at startup versus when the guest configures the bridge. Since this involves the management of hardware devices, particularly through bridges, it falls under 'peripherals'.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1470 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1470
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..508bc484
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1470
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The issue is about the mouse cursor disappearing when using a specific driver in Windows 3.11 under QEMU.
+
+First, let me understand the problem. The user has been using the GD5434 driver with QEMU on Fedora and noticed that after an upgrade to Fedora 37, the mouse cursor is missing. They traced it back to a specific git commit: cb8962c146.
+
+Looking at the categories provided:
+
+- Mistranslation, assembly, other are related more to code generation or user-mode issues.
+- Device and peripherals might be relevant since it's about hardware devices like the mouse.
+- Network, socket, KVM, VNC relate to different functionalities which aren't mentioned here.
+- Graphic could be related if it's a display issue, but the cursor is part of the graphics system.
+- Peripherals seems more appropriate because a mouse is a peripheral device.
+
+The problem specifically affects the mouse cursor, which is handled by QEMU's input/output handling for peripherals. So, this likely falls under the 'peripherals' category.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1476 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1476
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f3460bf1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1476
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "Support for additional CMOS memory banks." The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is about adding support for more CMOS memory banks. CMOS usually refers to the complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor RAM used in computers for various purposes, including hardware configuration data. In QEMU, which emulates hardware, supporting additional CMOS memory banks likely relates to the devices being emulated or how they're configured.
+
+Looking at the categories, "peripherals" seems appropriate because CMOS is part of the system's hardware components, and adding support would involve device emulation. Other options like "device" are too generic, but since it's about memory banks in a specific context (CMOS), peripherals fits better as it relates to the overall hardware devices being managed by QEMU.
+
+I don't think it's about assembly or mistranslation because those relate more to code generation or translation issues. It's not performance-related either; it's about adding functionality for additional hardware resources.
+
+So, I'll go with "peripherals."
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1478376 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1478376
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fbac698c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1478376
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, it's about the PL050 KMIDATA register not resetting correctly. The code provided is part of a read function for this register. When s->pending is false, the function returns s->last, but according to the user, it doesn't reset as expected after an interrupt.
+
+PL050 refers to a specific hardware device, specifically a PS/2 controller in QEMU. So, this issue relates to how a peripheral device is handled by the emulator.
+
+The possible categories related to hardware devices are 'peripherals' and 'device'. However, since PL050 is a specific controller, I think 'peripherals' is more precise because it refers to the emulation of hardware peripherals in QEMU. Alternatively, 'device' could also be considered, but 'peripherals' seems to fit better here as it's about device-specific behavior.
+
+Therefore, the category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue with a specific hardware controller (PL050) not resetting a register correctly. This falls under the handling of peripherals in QEMU.
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1479632 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1479632
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..923c0006
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1479632
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned issues with QEMU crashing when using sound and sometimes the program hangs without mouse input. They provided their command line which includes `-soundhw all`, so sound is definitely part of the setup.
+
+Looking at the categories given: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The main issue here seems to be with sound not working and causing crashes. Since it's related to hardware emulation, especially the sound hardware, I think 'peripherals' would be the appropriate category. Sound is a peripheral device, so problems here likely fall under that.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1481375 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1481375
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..541decd4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1481375
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the bug report carefully.
+
+The user is experiencing issues with "Sticky Keys" on their Windows 7 Pro VM running under QEMU KVM. They mention that certain keys like CTRL, ALT, Windows Key, and Escape get stuck when they boot into the VM or randomly. The host OS (CentOS) doesn't have this issue, which suggests it's something related to how the VM is handling input.
+
+Looking at their setup: Qemu KVM version 1.1.0, CentOS 7 as the host on a Lenovo Thinkpad Yoga. They've listed all their USB devices, including a Logitech mouse, Wacom tablet, and various other peripherals. The sticky keys problem affects both the USB keyboard and the laptop's built-in keyboard.
+
+The categories to choose from include device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others like assembly or mistranslation.
+
+Since the issue is about input keys not being released properly within the VM, it's related to how QEMU handles keyboard events. This falls under the category of device handling, specifically keyboards. But looking at the categories provided, 'peripherals' seems more appropriate because it's dealing with input devices like keyboards and mice.
+
+Another possibility could be KVM, as it's a virtualization issue within the hypervisor, but the problem is about how the VM processes keyboard inputs rather than general virtualization aspects. However, considering that KVM is the hypervisor here, maybe 'hypervisor' would be more precise. But I'm not entirely sure.
+
+Wait, let me think again. The bug report mentions that the host OS doesn't have this issue, so it's likely a problem with how QEMU (the emulator) handles the keyboard in the VM. That points towards an input device issue within the VM's peripherals. Therefore, 'peripherals' might be the correct category.
+
+Alternatively, if the issue is related to how the hypervisor interacts with hardware or virtual devices, then 'hypervisor' could apply. But since the problem is about stuck keys specifically on the keyboard, which is a peripheral device, I think 'peripherals' fits better.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves issues with input devices (keyboard) within the VM, so it falls under:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1491 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1491
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..945ed06b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1491
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report: "imx_epit will stop unexpectedly when counter rollover". The categories provided are quite specific.
+
+First, I know that imx_epit is related to the i.MX series of microcontrollers. EPIT stands for Enhanced Precision Interrupt Timer. So it's a hardware timer component.
+
+The issue mentions an unexpected stop when there's a counter rollover. Counter rollover happens when the timer completes its cycle and wraps around, which usually triggers an interrupt.
+
+Looking at the categories: I don't see anything related to timers directly. The closest might be 'other' if none of the provided categories fit. Alternatively, since it's about device drivers or hardware peripherals, maybe 'peripherals' could be a possibility. However, 'peripherals' isn't explicitly listed as an option in the given categories.
+
+Wait, looking back: the possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals.
+
+Since it's about a hardware component (the timer) and its interaction within QEMU, which emulates such devices, this falls under the 'peripherals' category. The bug relates to how the device (imx_epit) behaves in the emulation when a counter rolls over.
+</think>
+
+The issue pertains to an unexpected stop of the imx_epit hardware timer during a counter rollover, which is a problem within QEMU's emulation of this peripheral device. Therefore, it falls under:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1492649 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1492649
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5fce433a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1492649
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user is experiencing a problem with the HDA microphone input having a huge lag in their Windows 7 guest. They mentioned that using -soundhw hda causes the delay, but switching to ac97 fixes the lag but introduces choppy sound.
+
+First, I need to understand which category this falls into. Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about audio input delay in QEMU's HDA sound hardware. Since it's related to the soundhw and the delay is specific to HDA, this seems like a problem with the emulation of the sound hardware. In QEMU, the sound devices are part of the device emulation under peripherals. Therefore, the appropriate category here would be 'peripherals' because it's an issue with the virtual sound device not functioning correctly in terms of timing and input handling.
+
+I'm considering if it could be another category like 'performance,' but the problem isn't about speed or resource usage; it's specifically about the timing of audio input. So, peripherals seems more accurate as it relates to hardware emulation.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1496384 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1496384
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c85e98a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1496384
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the report carefully.
+
+The user mentions using QEMU on Windows and experiencing issues with the mouse. Specifically, they found that while the mouse works well in QEMU under Windows, it's unusable when running QEMU on Ubuntu without KVM. They also reference a known issue with error 0x5D during booting Win7 x64 on QEMU without KVM, which was marked as resolved in Linux.
+
+Looking at the options provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. The main issue here seems to be mouse usability, which falls under peripherals since it's related to input devices. While they mention KVM and performance on different systems, the core problem is about the mouse working incorrectly in certain environments.
+
+So, considering all this, the most appropriate category is 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1520730 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1520730
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..77c221c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1520730
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem again.
+
+The user reported that using 32-bit editors like vim or rhide in Freedos 1.1 and MS-Dos 6.22 causes issues with keyboard handling. Specifically, they noticed repeating characters and the key mode changing as if shift is held down. For example, 'a' becomes 'A', and '\' becomes '|'. The user believes this isn't a bug in FreeDos or MS-Dos because they see similar behavior in Dos 6.22, but it doesn't happen with DosBox.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The issue is about keyboard handling in QEMU when running DOS. The problem seems to be related to how the keyboard input is translated or handled within the emulator. This could be a translation error from the source architecture (DOS) to the target environment (QEMU's virtual machine). Alternatively, it might be an issue with how QEMU handles device peripherals, specifically the keyboard.
+
+But considering that the problem occurs when using certain editors and involves key presses being misinterpreted, it points more towards a translation or input handling issue. However, since the issue is related to hardware devices (keyboard) within the virtual machine, 'peripherals' might be the appropriate category because it's about emulating external devices correctly.
+
+Wait, but the user mentioned that the problem occurs in QEMU when using DOS, so perhaps it's an issue with how QEMU translates keyboard input from the host system to the guest OS. That would fall under 'mistranslation', as it's about incorrect mapping of hardware events (keyboard presses) in the emulation.
+
+But another angle is that it's a bug in the device emulation, specifically the keyboard device. So maybe 'device' or 'peripherals' are more fitting because they relate to hardware devices within the VM.
+
+I think 'mistranslation' might be about the instruction set translation, like from x86 to QEMU's target, but this is more about input handling, which could be part of device emulation. Alternatively, it's a bug in how the keyboard events are handled in the virtual machine, so maybe under 'peripherals'.
+
+Wait, looking back at the categories: 'device' and 'peripherals' seem similar but perhaps 'peripherals' refers to hardware devices like USB or PS/2 devices emulated by QEMU. So if the keyboard is acting up, it's a peripheral device issue.
+
+But I'm not entirely sure. Alternatively, since the bug affects how keys are interpreted in the guest OS, it might be due to incorrect translation of key events from the host to the guest, which would tie into 'mistranslation' as that involves mapping source (host) input to target (guest) behavior.
+
+Hmm. Maybe I should consider if this is a user-mode issue or kernel-related. Since QEMU handles device emulation at a lower level, perhaps it's more about device handling than user-mode translation. So 'peripherals' might be the right category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves incorrect keyboard handling when using DOS in QEMU, which points to an issue with how hardware input is emulated. This likely falls under the category of 'peripherals' as it pertains to the emulation of devices within the virtual machine.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1523811 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1523811
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fb30a4d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1523811
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The bug is about a USB assert failure in dev-storage.c when running a Python script in the guest OS. Let me think through this step by step.
+
+First, the error message mentions "hw/usb/dev-storage.c" and an assertion failing at line 445: `usb_msd_handle_data`. The specific condition is that `le32_to_cpu(s->csw.residue)` isn't zero when it should be. This suggests there's a problem with how USB mass storage devices are handled in QEMU.
+
+The user explains that this happens when they detach the kernel driver, send CBW (which I think stands for Command Block Wrapper) without following the correct protocol steps, and then reattach. They suspect it's due to a misimplementation of the Command/Data/Status protocol in Bulk-only transfers. So, the issue is related to how QEMU handles USB storage device communication.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is about a USB device interaction leading to an assertion failure. USB devices fall under the 'peripherals' category because they're hardware devices connected to the system that QEMU emulates or manages. The problem isn't with translation between architectures (mistranslation), nor is it related to graphics, sockets, networking directly, KVM as a hypervisor, booting, VNC, debugging, files, permissions, performance, kernel modules, or other broader categories.
+
+Therefore, the most appropriate category for this bug report is 'peripherals' since it's specifically about USB device handling.
+</think>
+
+The bug involves an issue with USB device handling, specifically within the mass storage emulation in QEMU. This points to a problem related to peripherals as USB devices are considered peripherals in the context of QEMU.
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1525123 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1525123
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c1a09c93
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1525123
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification. The user provided a detailed issue with QEMU related to a USB assert failure in hcd-uhci.c. They mentioned that inserting a kernel module causes the guest OS to close and QEMU exits with an assertion error.
+
+First, I need to understand what each category means. The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report talks about a USB-related issue in QEMU, specifically mentioning hcd-uhci.c. The error occurs when a kernel module is inserted into the guest OS, leading to an assertion failure. The user attributes this to a misimplementation of UHCI (Universal Host Controller Interface). They also provided steps to reproduce and mentioned that the exploit causes QEMU to exit entirely.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+- "device" likely refers to hardware device issues in the virtual machine.
+- "peripherals" could include USB devices, as they are peripheral components.
+- The error is within the USB subsystem of QEMU, which handles peripherals like USB controllers.
+
+The assert failure is in hw/usb/core.c, indicating a problem with the USB core handling. Since UHCI is part of the USB controller implementation, this points to a bug in how the USB device or its drivers are handled by QEMU.
+
+Given that the issue relates to USB functionality and the specific mention of UHCI, which is part of the USB host controller, the most appropriate category seems to be "peripherals." This is because it's an issue with how QEMU handles USB devices as peripherals in the virtual environment.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a USB-related assertion failure due to incorrect handling of UHCI packets. The issue arises from misimplementation in QEMU's USB core code, leading to QEMU termination when a kernel module is inserted. Since this pertains to USB device handling within the virtual machine, it falls under the "peripherals" category.
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1548166 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1548166
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..433d83b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1548166
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I'm looking at this bug report where QEMU crashes after sending data from the host through the serial port. The user mentioned they're using two Win7 machines and a specific QEMU version. They tried setting up COM ports with com0com and ran into issues when launching QEMU after starting the debugger tools.
+
+First, I notice that the problem occurs when sending data, specifically when pressing the "Down" key in the terminal. This makes me think it's related to how QEMU handles input or serial port communication. The user also mentioned that without using the debugger tools and just using a terminal, everything works fine except when they press keys.
+
+I'm considering possible categories like 'network' because it involves communication over ports, but this seems more about serial devices rather than network interfaces. 'device' might fit since it's hardware-related, but maybe there's a better category.
+
+The issue arises during input handling, so perhaps it's related to how QEMU processes serial data or interacts with the COM port driver. Maybe the problem is in the way QEMU sends or receives data through the serial interface, causing a crash when certain keys are pressed.
+
+Another angle is that using the debugger tools might be interfering with the QEMU process. The user launched the debugger first and then started QEMU, which could cause resource conflicts or misconfiguration of COM ports. However, they mentioned setting up com0com correctly, so maybe it's not a port conflict but something else.
+
+Looking at the possible categories again: 'mistranslation' relates to incorrect semantic mapping in user-mode assembly, which doesn't seem relevant here. 'assembly lowering' is about converting high-level code to assembly, which isn't the issue. 'other' is too vague but might apply if none of the specific categories fit.
+
+Since the crash happens when sending data via the serial port, it's likely a bug in how QEMU handles device I/O or communication. The 'serial' falls under peripherals, so maybe that's the category. Alternatively, it could be related to the hypervisor or KVM if there's an issue with virtualization handling input.
+
+But considering the categories given, 'device' seems more appropriate as it directly relates to hardware devices like serial ports. However, 'peripherals' might also fit since a serial port is a peripheral device.
+
+Wait, but in the list provided by the user, 'serial' isn't explicitly listed. The options are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals.
+
+So 'peripherals' would cover serial ports as they're input/output devices attached to the system. Therefore, this bug is likely under the 'peripherals' category because it's about how QEMU interacts with the serial port device.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to communication through the serial port causing a crash in QEMU when data is sent, particularly when using certain keys. This suggests a problem with how QEMU handles input/output via peripherals like the serial port.
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1574246 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1574246
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fa7a41ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1574246
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. So, the user is reporting an issue with QEMU where certain keystrokes are being missed or repeated when using a go32v2 program under specific conditions. 
+
+First, I'll read through the details again. The problem occurs in QEMU 2.5.0 and SeaBIOS 1.9.1. They've tested it with various DPMI hosts like CWSDPMI and HDPMI32. When running go32v2 programs such as the Lua interpreter or Free Pascal IDE, typing quickly causes some keys to be missed or caught twice. 
+
+It's interesting that this doesn't happen on bare metal DOS or in other emulators like VirtualBox, Bochs, DOSEMU, or DOSBox. It also happens regardless of whether KVM is enabled. So the issue is likely with QEMU itself or SeaBIOS.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The bug seems related to how keyboard input is handled in the virtual machine. Since it's happening with QEMU's SeaBIOS, which manages hardware devices, especially peripherals like the keyboard. The problem isn't with the translation of code but rather with device emulation.
+
+So the category should be 'peripherals' because it's about handling I/O devices like the keyboard.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to how the virtual machine handles keyboard input, which falls under peripheral device management in QEMU.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1583420 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1583420
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4c5f7f7b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1583420
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user is asking for support for the "-soundhw none" option. From what I understand, QEMU currently allows changing the default sound hardware with options like "-soundhw pcspkr", which disables most of it. But there's no way to completely disable all sound hardware without using -nodefaults and manually specifying each device.
+
+First, I need to look at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is about adding a new command-line option to disable all sound hardware. Sound hardware in QEMU usually falls under the category of devices or peripherals. Since it's related to sound, which is a specific type of device, I'm leaning towards 'peripherals' as the correct category. 
+
+I don't think it's mistranslation because that would relate more to how code is translated from one architecture to another, which isn't the case here. It's not about assembly or performance either. The sound hardware is a peripheral component, so adding support for disabling it would be under peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1603734 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1603734
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c6ca785d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1603734
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. The issue is about a hang in the function fsqrt, specifically in floatx80_sqrt, which happens in versions 2.6.0 and git (2.6.50). The user mentioned that it's likely due to an infinite loop at fpu/softfloat.c:6569.
+
+First, I'll look at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is related to floating-point operations, specifically square root calculations. The problem occurs in the softfloat code, which deals with software-based floating-point simulation for QEMU's target architectures (i368 and x86_64). Since it's a hang due to an infinite loop during computation, this seems like a logic or implementation error in the floating-point handling code.
+
+Looking at the categories, none of them directly mention floating-point operations. The closest might be 'other' since it's not fitting into the more specific categories provided. Alternatively, maybe 'hypervisor' could be considered if it's related to how QEMU emulates processor features, but I'm not sure that's a perfect fit.
+
+Wait, perhaps 'mistranslation' is about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture. But this issue isn't about translation between architectures; it's about an error in the softfloat implementation, which might be part of the target machine's instruction handling rather than the user-mode or IR mapping. So maybe 'assembly lowering' could be relevant since it's about converting higher-level operations into assembly code. However, I'm not entirely certain if that's the exact category here.
+
+Alternatively, the issue is in the FPU (Floating-Point Unit) emulation, which falls under peripherals because it's emulating hardware components of the target machine. Peripherals include all the devices and hardware units that QEMU emulates for the guest OS, so this might be the best fit.
+
+But looking back, the user mentioned it's happening in softfloat.c, which is part of the FPU emulation code. Since 'peripherals' would cover the FPU as a hardware component being emulated, that seems more appropriate than 'other'.
+
+Wait, but I'm not sure if 'peripherals' specifically refers to hardware devices like disks or network cards. Maybe it's more about the CPU's FPU unit, which is part of the central processing emulation rather than peripherals.
+
+Hmm, perhaps 'hypervisor' isn't right either because that usually refers to the management of virtual machines. So maybe 'other' is still the safest category since the issue doesn't neatly fit into the predefined ones.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1603785 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1603785
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2155dea2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1603785
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let's see what the issue is.
+
+The user mentioned that when running QEMU with tracing enabled, the trace file contains "junk data." Specifically, they provided an example where the output has unprintable characters: "devspeed <90>l<DB>.<D8>U". 
+
+They traced this back to a function in hw/usb/bus.c called usb_mask_to_str. The problem occurs when the speedmask doesn't match any defined speeds, leading to uninitialized data being printed. This happens with a real USB device forwarded into the machine.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is related to how USB devices are handled. The function in question is part of the USB bus handling code (hw/usb/bus.c). Since it's about processing and printing speed data from a USB device, which doesn't match any expected speeds, this seems like a problem with how the USB peripherals are being managed.
+
+The issue isn't related to translation between architectures, so mistranslation is out. It's not an assembly lowering problem because that's more about code generation. The bug is within the device handling logic, specifically for USB devices.
+
+Therefore, the category should be "peripherals" because it's dealing with hardware device interaction and data representation.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to how USB devices are handled in QEMU, specifically involving incorrect string conversion of speed data, which falls under the peripherals category.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1605045 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1605045
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5f658646
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1605045
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's read through the details carefully.
+
+The issue is about the Enter key being stuck or broken when using the input-linux evdev passthrough feature in QEMU 2.6.0. The problem occurs after launching a guest with a shell script, causing repeated new lines. After some time during boot, the Enter key stops being pressed. However, when pressing both left and right Ctrl keys to switch back to the host (under Gnome on Wayland), the Enter key stops working entirely in the host. It works fine under the guest but doesn't return functionality until a reboot.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem seems related to how input is handled between the host and guest. The Enter key issue could be due to incorrect handling of input events, possibly during passthrough. Since it's specifically about the keyboard (Enter key) misbehavior when switching between host and guest, it likely falls under a device-related issue because devices include keyboards and other peripherals.
+
+Alternatively, it might also touch on 'boot' if it's related to how QEMU initializes or handles input at startup, but since the main problem is with the Enter key after passthrough, I think 'peripherals' is more appropriate. Peripherals category would cover issues with input devices like the keyboard not functioning correctly when using features like evdev passthrough.
+
+Therefore, the most suitable category for this bug report is 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The issue relates to incorrect handling of input events specifically with the Enter key when using evdev passthrough in QEMU. Since this involves a device (keyboard) misbehavior during host-guest interaction, it falls under 'peripherals'.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/161 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/161
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3843f811
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/161
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report: "virtio-scsi gives improper discard sysfs entries". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I need to understand what the bug is about. "Virtio-scsi" refers to VirtIO SCSI, which is a virtualization technology that allows communication between a guest OS and the host's SCSI devices in a virtualized environment. 
+
+The issue here is about "improper discard sysfs entries". Sysfs is the filesystem interface for kernel objects, used by user space programs to access information about the system and control kernel features. Discard operations relate to handling of storage device blocks that can be discarded (like in SSDs) to improve performance or manage wear.
+
+So, the problem is likely with how VirtIO-SCSI handles discard entries in sysfs. This could mean that when a guest OS interacts with virtual SCSI devices via VirtIO, it's not properly setting up or managing the discard-related sysfs entries, which might affect storage performance, device management, or cause errors.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- Mistranslation: Not sure; this is about semantics in QEMU. Maybe if there's an issue with how the code translates between architectures, but I'm not certain.
+- Assembly: Lowering to assembly, probably not relevant here.
+- Device: This seems more related to hardware devices and their management. Since VirtIO deals with virtual devices, "device" might be a fit.
+- Peripherals: Also possible because SCSI is a type of peripheral device.
+- Kernel: The issue relates to sysfs entries, which are kernel-related in user space, so maybe this category could apply too.
+
+But considering that VirtIO-SCSI is part of the hypervisor's management (since it's a virtualization component), perhaps the correct category is "hypervisor". Alternatively, since it's about SCSI devices and their handling in sysfs, "peripherals" or "device" might be better.
+
+Wait, looking at the options again: device, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+"Hypervisor" would be about the management of virtual machines themselves, while "peripherals" relates more to hardware devices attached to VMs. Since VirtIO is part of QEMU/KVM's handling of virtualized I/O devices, which are often considered as emulated hardware (peripheral devices) for the guest OS.
+
+So, the issue with improper discard sysfs entries in virtio-scsi would fall under "peripherals" because it pertains to how the VirtIO-SCSI device is exposed and managed within the hypervisor environment.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1611979 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1611979
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c55634a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1611979
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, or other. The bug report says that the GTK+ interface has a broken backspace in the monitor console and it's been an issue for over two years.
+
+First, I'm thinking about what each category means. Mistranslation relates to incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target, which sounds more like a compiler or translation layer issue. Assembly lowering is probably about converting high-level code into assembly, so that might not fit here either.
+
+Looking at the bug report, it's about the GTK+ interface. GTK+ is a graphical toolkit used for creating user interfaces in applications. The specific problem is with the backspace key in the monitor console. So this seems like an issue related to how input (specifically keyboard input) is handled within the application's graphical interface.
+
+Now, considering the categories: device might relate to hardware devices, socket to networking sockets, network to network functionality, KVM to virtualization, boot to boot process issues, vnc to remote desktop, debug to debugging tools, files to file handling, permissions to access rights, performance to speed or resource usage, kernel to operating system internals, peripherals to input/output devices like keyboards, and hypervisor to virtual machine management.
+
+The backspace issue in the console is a problem with how the application handles keyboard input. Since it's part of the graphical interface (GTK+), it might be related to input handling within the GUI. The category 'peripherals' seems appropriate here because it's about the interaction between the software and hardware peripherals, specifically the keyboard.
+
+Alternatively, it could fall under 'graphic' since it's about the GTK+ interface, but I think 'peripherals' is a better fit because it's more about input devices and their handling rather than the graphical display itself. The issue isn't with rendering or display but with how the backspace key functions within the GUI.
+
+Wait, another thought: sometimes console issues can relate to terminal emulation or input processing. But since GTK+ is used, it might be part of the application's own input handling. So 'peripherals' still seems right because it's about device interaction—specifically, the keyboard not functioning as expected in the interface.
+
+I don't think it's any of the other categories like network, socket, or kernel because those are unrelated to user interface elements. It's more about user experience and input handling within the application's GUI.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1613 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1613
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8b4004ac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1613
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The user is having issues with HD webcams and microphones in SuperSpeed mode when using QEMU. They mentioned that when they use HighSpeed mode, everything works fine, but in SuperSpeed mode, only MJPEG format at low resolutions works. They attached some pcap files and did packet captures comparing host and guest systems.
+
+The key part is where they noticed an issue with isochronous endpoint configurations supporting high bandwidth pipes. Specifically, the bMaxBurst value is greater than 0, which affects how data packets are handled. According to the xHCI specification, the transfer size should be calculated based on wMaxPacketSize, Max Burst Size, and Mult. However, in their captures, the transfers are only 1024 bytes instead of the expected larger size.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The issue is related to USB devices not functioning correctly in SuperSpeed mode within QEMU. Since this involves USB endpoint configurations and xHCI handling, it's likely a problem with how the hypervisor (QEMU) manages USB devices, specifically their high-bandwidth pipes and descriptors.
+
+So, the category that best fits this bug is 'peripherals' because it pertains to the handling of USB devices (peripherals) in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The issue relates to USB device handling, particularly with SuperSpeed mode and endpoint configurations. This falls under the peripherals category as it involves managing USB devices within QEMU.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1615823 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1615823
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b2fe08a0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1615823
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU. The user is running Windows 10 as a guest on Ubuntu using KVM and libvirt. They're encountering an issue where the TPM device isn't recognized correctly. Even though Device Manager shows the TPM is present, the driver can't load because it says there's no compatible chip.
+
+The user mentions that this works fine when installing Windows directly on the host machine, which implies that the hardware is functional and compatible. However, in the virtualized environment with QEMU, it fails. They've tested this with multiple versions of QEMU (2.5, 2.6.1, and 2.7.0-rc4) and all show the same problem.
+
+Looking at their command line, they're using various devices: i82801b11-bridge,pci-bridge,qxl-vga,virtio-blk-pci, etc., which are standard for such setups. The crucial part here is the TPM configuration with tpmdev and tpm-tis.
+
+The user also references a specific commit (2b1c2e8...) in QEMU's git history that was supposed to address this issue. This suggests that there might have been a bug fix related to TPM support in earlier versions, but perhaps it wasn't fully resolved or the fix didn't make it into all versions they tested.
+
+Now, categorizing this: The problem is with the interaction between QEMU and the host's TPM device. Since QEMU is acting as a hypervisor (using KVM), it's responsible for exposing hardware devices to the guest. If the guest isn't detecting the TPM correctly, it might be due to how QEMU handles the TPM passthrough or configuration.
+
+The issue doesn't seem to fall under mistranslation or assembly lowering because those relate more to code generation and execution within user-mode. It also isn't directly related to graphics, sockets, networking (though network drivers are involved, but that's not the main issue here), KVM itself is part of the setup, or VNC/debugging. The problem is specifically with the TPM device, which is a hardware peripheral.
+
+Therefore, this bug falls under the 'peripherals' category because it's about how QEMU handles specific hardware devices (TPM) in the virtual environment.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1618301 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1618301
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..97eea17a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1618301
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is about a mouse stopping working in a Windows guest. The user mentions that the ROCCAT Kone XTD mouse randomly stops until it's restarted. They also provided an event from the Windows Event Viewer related to i8042prt with the error "Could not set the mouse resolution."
+
+First, I'll think about what each category means.
+
+- Mistranslation: This would relate to how source architecture is translated incorrectly in QEMU's IR or target code. Since this issue is about a hardware device (mouse) not working, it doesn't seem related.
+  
+- Assembly: Lowering assembly code; again, this is more about the translation of code rather than hardware interaction.
+
+- Other: This is a catch-all category, but perhaps I can find a more specific one.
+
+- Device: QEMU handles various devices and their emulation. Mouse input is handled through device emulation, so this could be relevant.
+
+- Graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor: Looking at these, 'peripherals' seems related because the mouse is a peripheral device. The issue is about input devices not working correctly in the guest OS.
+
+The error mentions i8042prt, which is the Intel 8042 I/O APIC controller driver for PS/2 devices. This suggests that the problem lies in how QEMU emulates the PS/2 mouse interface or how it's handled in the Windows guest. 
+
+In QEMU, the input devices are typically emulated through various drivers and interfaces. If the mouse stops working, it could be an issue with the emulation of the device in the hypervisor (QEMU) which acts as a hardware virtualization manager.
+
+But looking at the categories again, 'hypervisor' refers more to the management of virtual machines rather than specific devices. However, QEMU does act as a hypervisor when running guests. Alternatively, 'peripherals' would refer specifically to input/output devices like mice, keyboards, etc.
+
+So, considering that the issue is with a hardware device (mouse) not functioning correctly in the guest OS, and given that this relates to how QEMU emulates or handles the device's interface, the category should be 'peripherals.'
+
+Wait, but another thought: sometimes input issues can relate to the way events are handled by the VNC server or other display systems. However, the error here is specific to i8042prt, which points more towards hardware emulation rather than graphical output.
+
+Therefore, the most fitting category is 'peripherals' because it's about a mouse device not working correctly in the guest OS.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where a mouse stops functioning in a Windows guest running under QEMU. The error message from the event viewer points to i8042prt, which handles PS/2 devices, indicating a problem with the mouse emulation or handling within QEMU.
+
+Since this is related to input device (mouse) functionality in the guest OS, it falls under the category of 'peripherals.'
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1636770 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1636770
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7a0f1239
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1636770
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The bug is about the mouse wheel working only when using "-usbdevice tablet". Let me think through each category.
+
+First, the problem involves a mouse, which is a peripheral device. So, it's related to how QEMU handles peripherals. The user mentioned that without specifying -usbdevice tablet, the mouse wheel doesn't work as expected. That suggests an issue with USB device configuration or handling in QEMU.
+
+Looking at the categories: 'peripherals' seems directly relevant here because the mouse is a peripheral device. Other possibilities like 'network', 'graphic', or 'device' might be related, but they are more specific to different areas. 'Device' is too vague, and 'graphic' would relate more to display issues rather than input devices.
+
+The bug isn't about translation errors, assembly lowering, performance, or permissions; it's specifically about the mouse not functioning correctly without a certain flag. Therefore, 'peripherals' is the most appropriate category.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/165 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/165
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5f4ca257
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/165
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "No evdev mouse passthrough with virtio-vga or kvm". The categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about mouse passthrough not working. Mouse passthrough typically relates to how devices are handled in a virtualized environment. Since it's related to input devices (mouse), that points towards the "peripherals" category because peripherals usually include input/output devices like mice, keyboards, etc.
+
+Looking at the possible categories, 'device' could also be relevant, but 'peripherals' is more specific to input/output hardware. The bug mentions evdev, which is related to device events in Linux, and KVM is involved as a hypervisor. However, the core issue is about mouse passthrough not functioning, which falls under how peripherals are handled in the virtual environment.
+
+So, the most appropriate category here is 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1653384 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1653384
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..973f3700
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1653384
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. The possible options are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report: It's about an assertion failure when using USB passthrough with the XHCI controller. The error message is hw/usb/core.c:623: usb_packet_cleanup: Assertion `!usb_packet_is_inflight(p)' failed.
+
+The user reproduces it by starting QEMU with nec-usb-xhci and a host device. When they switch to usb-ehci, it works without issues. They also mention that the problem occurs in both v2.8.0 and the latest master branch, with the bisected bad commit being [94b037f2a451b3dc855f9f2c346e5049a361bd55], which changes how XHCI handles transfers using a linked list.
+
+The backtrace shows that it's failing in the USB core code, specifically during packet cleanup. The issue seems to be related to how USB packets are managed when using the XHCI controller with USB passthrough devices.
+
+Considering the categories: This isn't about translation or assembly. It's not directly about graphics, sockets, network (though USB could involve networking indirectly), KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, or hypervisor. The problem is specifically with USB hardware emulation, which falls under peripherals.
+
+So the correct category should be 'peripherals' because it's related to USB device handling in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1654826 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1654826
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..304b0450
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1654826
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem again carefully.
+
+The user is reporting an issue where holding a key down using input-linux in QEMU causes the guest system to freeze. They mentioned that when they hold a key like ctrl for a few seconds, the guest freezes until they release it. Sometimes mouse control is lost too, and one of the CPU cores goes up to 100% during these freezes.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The bug is related to input handling with QEMU's input-linux capability, which I think is part of the device passthrough for input devices like keyboards and mice. So this involves how QEMU handles input events.
+
+Since it's causing a freeze when holding a key down, which suggests an issue in event processing or resource management within QEMU. The high CPU usage on one core indicates a possible blocking issue where the guest is waiting indefinitely until the key is released.
+
+Looking at the categories, "peripherals" seems relevant because input devices are peripherals. Alternatively, it might fall under "device" as well, but since it's specifically about input handling, "peripherals" might be more accurate.
+
+Wait, but in QEMU terminology, input-linux relates to the device's passthrough via the "input" capability, which is a type of device configuration. So maybe "device" is the category here because it's about how devices are handled by the hypervisor or QEMU.
+
+Alternatively, considering that the issue is with input handling causing a freeze and high CPU usage, perhaps "performance" could be another angle, but performance usually refers to speed rather than blocking issues.
+
+I think "peripherals" is more precise here because it's specifically about how input devices are being managed by QEMU. So the category should be peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1655702 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1655702
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c627b31a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1655702
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories. The categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, it's about a possible pointless local variable in the file `qemu/hw/char/exynos4210_uart.c`. The code snippet shows that the variable `frame_size` is being used but perhaps not necessary. The user suggests either using it or deleting it.
+
+First, I should identify what part of QEMU this relates to. The file path indicates it's under `hw/char`, which usually deals with hardware devices, specifically character devices. In this case, it's related to the Exynos4210 UART controller.
+
+The bug is pointing out a potential issue with variable usage. It doesn't seem to relate directly to translation issues (mistranslation), nor does it involve assembly code or any of the other listed categories like network, KVM, etc. Instead, it's about whether a local variable is necessary or not, which affects the correctness and possibly performance or clarity of the code.
+
+Considering that the file is under hardware/char, this might be related to peripherals. Peripherals in QEMU are handled through various hardware devices, so any issue with their implementation would fall under that category. The problem here isn't about device drivers per se but more about code quality within a device-related component.
+
+Other categories like performance could be considered if the variable affects performance, but since it's just a local variable potentially being unused or misused, it's more about code correctness rather than performance impact. Therefore, the most fitting category seems to be 'peripherals' because it pertains to hardware device handling in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses a potential issue with a local variable in the Exynos4210 UART controller code within QEMU. Since this relates to hardware character devices and their implementation, the appropriate category is peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1668103 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1668103
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..dd6e6e97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1668103
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The user mentioned an off-by-one error in the PL190.c file related to handling vector addresses in interrupt service routines (ISR). 
+
+Looking at the provided categories: translation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is with hardware-specific code in hw/PL190.c. PL190 is a controller chip, likely related to devices or peripherals. The problem occurs when reading VECTADDR, which is part of the interrupt handling mechanism. This seems to be a hardware emulation bug within QEMU, affecting how device interrupts are handled.
+
+The suggested solution involves modifying the priority mask and loop termination in the update_vectors function, which directly impacts how vector addresses are read during an ISR. Since this is related to device drivers or peripheral devices' interrupt handling, the most appropriate category is "peripherals."
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1671677 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1671677
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..140a3576
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1671677
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report where a user is having issues with vfio-pci passthrough after resuming from suspend in QEMU. The problem happens when the laptop has been suspended since the last boot. The GPU stops working, and Windows reports an error 43.
+
+First, I need to figure out which category this falls into from the given list: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is related to vfio-pci passthrough and resume from suspend. VFIO (Virtual Function I/O) is used for device passthrough in QEMU/KVM. The problem occurs when the system resumes after being suspended, so it's related to how devices are handled during this state transition.
+
+Since the GPU isn't working correctly upon resume, it points towards a problem with device management rather than something like translation or assembly. It's not about how code is translated but more about hardware devices and their state after resuming.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'peripherals' seems appropriate because vfio-pci deals with passing through physical devices to virtual machines, which are handled as peripherals in this context. The issue arises during a system suspend/resume cycle, affecting device functionality.
+
+Other possible categories like 'device' could also fit, but 'peripherals' is more specific here since it's about the GPU being passed through and its behavior after resume.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue with vfio-pci passthrough failing after resuming from suspend. Since this relates to device handling during a system state transition (suspend/resume), the category that best fits this scenario is 'peripherals'.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1674 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1674
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9f74778f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1674
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU where the arrow keys aren't working in the monitor when using nographic on Windows 11. Let me try to figure out what's going on and classify it correctly.
+
+First, the user mentioned that the problem occurs only when using the -nographic option on Windows. On Linux, it works fine. So something is different about how QEMU handles input in this specific setup.
+
+They provided steps to reproduce, which involve building from source but also checked pre-built binaries, so it's not a build issue. The key point is that arrow keys don't work when nographic is used, but they do work without it using the GTK console.
+
+Looking at additional info, they tried modifying code in qemu_chr_open_stdio() to enable more input modes. That change made the arrow keys functional. So this suggests an issue with how the terminal or input handling is set up in Windows builds of QEMU.
+
+They also mentioned that VT (Virtual Terminal) sequences were added via a commit but might not be enabled properly at runtime. Microsoft's documentation shows how to enable it, which wasn't being done. This explains why without enabling VT processing, certain key inputs aren't recognized.
+
+The bug seems related to the terminal handling in Windows, specifically how QEMU enables or processes virtual terminal sequences. The problem isn't with user-mode assembly translation but rather with how input is managed at a higher level.
+
+So, considering the categories: mistranslation is about source to IR mapping, which doesn't apply here. It's not an assembly lowering issue either. It falls under peripherals because it's related to input devices (keyboard) and their interaction with QEMU's console handling.
+
+Peripherals make sense because arrow keys are part of input hardware emulation in the emulator. The issue is that QEMU isn't correctly enabling the necessary settings on Windows to process these key presses, which affects the peripheral input handling.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1674056 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1674056
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5aca96cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1674056
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm looking at this bug report and trying to figure out which category it falls into. The user is having trouble with their QEMU/KVM setup where the host's keyboard and mouse are being "sucked in" by the VM. They can't control the host because the input devices are grabbed by QEMU regardless of whether they're using graphics or not.
+
+The command line they provided shows that they've tried various options like -nographics, -curses, and others, but none seem to fix the issue. They mention that even without a GUI, the problem persists, which makes me think it's related to how QEMU handles input devices when running in headless mode.
+
+I remember that QEMU has features for capturing keyboard and mouse input, especially when using certain display types or when not properly configuring the device passthrough. The user tried specifying USB devices but still experienced the same behavior. It seems like the VM is taking over the host's input, which isn't intended in a headless setup.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: hypervisor would be related to KVM itself, but this issue is more about device handling. The problem here is with peripheral devices (keyboard and mouse) being captured by QEMU/KVM, so the appropriate category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1680991 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1680991
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fcbf8abf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1680991
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user is having an issue with the system timer device on a Raspberry Pi 2B when using QEMU. They mentioned that reading certain memory locations returns zero instead of the expected counts.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The user's problem is specifically about the system timer not being implemented. They provided code and debugging information showing that their ReadSysTimerCount function isn't returning the correct values. The issue persists across different QEMU versions they've tested.
+
+Since this involves hardware peripheral devices (system timer), which is part of the device emulation in QEMU, it seems to fall under 'device'. Alternatively, since it's related to specific hardware peripherals like timers, the 'peripherals' category might be more precise. However, 'peripherals' isn't one of the options listed; the closest is 'device'.
+
+Wait, checking again: The user mentions "system timer device", which is a peripheral. In QEMU, peripherals are often handled as devices or specific emulated hardware components. So the category should align with that.
+
+I think the correct classification here would be 'peripherals' because it's about an unimplemented hardware component in the emulation. But looking back at the list provided by the user, 'peripherals' isn't there—wait no, checking again: The categories listed include 'device', which might cover this. Alternatively, perhaps 'other'? No, since it's a specific device not emulated.
+
+Wait, the options are:
+
+mistranslation
+assembly
+other
+device
+graphic
+socket
+network
+KVM
+boot
+vnc
+debug
+files
+permissions
+performance
+kernel
+peripherals
+hypervisor
+
+So 'peripherals' is actually an option. Therefore, since it's about a system timer device not being implemented, which is a hardware peripheral, the category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where the system timer on a Raspberry Pi 2B isn't functioning correctly in QEMU. The user tested their code against the documented specifications but found that reading from the CLO address returns zero instead of the expected counts. This points to a problem with how QEMU emulates the system timer device, which is part of the hardware peripherals. Therefore, the appropriate classification for this issue is under 'peripherals' as it pertains to an unimplemented or malfunctioning hardware component in the emulation.
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1685526 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1685526
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1680311d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1685526
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The issue is about UEFI firmware not being able to write to a "fake" FAT hard disk in QEMU. 
+
+First, let's understand what each category means:
+
+- **mistranslation**: This would involve incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR or target, likely in user-mode.
+- **assembly**: Related to assembly lowering issues.
+- **other**: For anything that doesn't fit the other categories.
+- **device**: Issues with hardware devices emulation.
+- **graphic**: Problems related to graphical output.
+- **socket**: Socket-related bugs.
+- **network**: Networking issues.
+- **KVM**: Kernel-based Virtual Machine specific problems.
+- **boot**: Booting issues.
+- **vnc**: Remote desktop protocol (VNC) related.
+- **debug**: Debugging tools or logs.
+- **files**: File handling issues.
+- **permissions**: Permission-related bugs.
+- **performance**: Performance degradation.
+- **kernel**: Kernel-level issues.
+- **peripherals**: Problems with peripherals like disks, USB, etc.
+- **hypervisor**: Issues with the hypervisor layer.
+
+The bug report mentions that UEFI applications can't write to an emulated FAT disk. The problem occurs when using Tianocore OVMF firmware and the `-hda fat:rw:path/here` option. Files get created or written but are corrupted. 
+
+Since it's about writing to a disk image in QEMU, this relates to how the hypervisor (QEMU) emulates storage devices. The issue is with the emulation of the hard disk, specifically the FAT filesystem. Therefore, this falls under **peripherals**, as it deals with device emulation rather than other categories like boot or network.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1686980 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1686980
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e2bfac55
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1686980
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. The user provided a detailed bug report where adding 16,384 virtio-scsi drives causes QEMU to run very slowly. They mentioned that the stack trace from perf shows functions like drive_get and blk_legacy_dinfo taking up most of the CPU time.
+
+First, I should understand what each category means. Mistranslation is about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture in user mode. That doesn't seem relevant here because the issue is performance-related, not a translation error.
+
+Assembly lowering (assembly) would relate to issues during the assembly code generation step. The problem here isn't specific to how code is being translated but rather the overall slowness when adding many drives, so that's probably not it either.
+
+The bug report mentions Virtio-SCSI drives, which are a type of storage device emulation in QEMU. The performance hit is significant when adding a large number of these devices. Looking at the stack trace, functions like drive_get and blk_next suggest issues within the block layer or device handling. 
+
+Considering the categories: network, socket, and graphic don't seem to apply here since the problem is with storage devices (SCSI). KVM relates to kernel-based virtualization, but this issue seems more about the hypervisor's handling of many devices rather than KVM itself.
+
+The 'peripherals' category would cover issues with devices attached to the VM. Since Virtio-SCSI is a peripheral device, and the problem arises when adding many such devices, it fits under peripherals. However, performance issues could also fall under the 'performance' category. 
+
+But since the bug specifically involves multiple drives causing slowness in handling device-related functions (drive_get), it's more about how QEMU manages these devices rather than general performance. So 'peripherals' seems appropriate.
+
+Alternatively, if the issue is about the hypervisor layer struggling to handle numerous devices efficiently, 'hypervisor' could be a contender. But since Virtio-SCSI is typically handled through device emulation and not directly by the hypervisor's core functions, 'peripherals' might still be better.
+
+Wait, another thought: performance issues often have their own category, which is 'performance'. The problem here is that adding many drives slows down the system, so it's a performance issue. Therefore, maybe 'performance' is the correct category.
+
+But the stack trace points to functions within device handling (drive_get), which suggests that the root cause is in how devices are managed. So perhaps it's more about peripherals than overall performance.
+
+I'm a bit torn between 'peripherals' and 'performance'. The issue affects performance, but the underlying cause is related to device management. Since the categories are somewhat overlapping, I should choose based on what the bug report emphasizes. It says QEMU runs slowly when adding many virtio-scsi drives, so it's about handling those devices efficiently.
+
+Therefore, I think 'peripherals' is the correct category because the problem is with managing multiple SCSI devices.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes a performance issue when adding numerous Virtio-SCSI drives, which are handled by QEMU's device management. The stack trace points to functions related to device handling, suggesting the issue lies in how QEMU manages these devices rather than general system performance.
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1694808 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1694808
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..498fc8ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1694808
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read through the problem again.
+
+The user is reporting that a USB host keyboard isn't working on Q35 platform during boot-up in QEMU-KVM. They used a specific command line with "-M q35" and when they remove it, switching to i440FX, the keyboard works. The issue seems related to how the Q35 platform handles USB devices.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is about a USB keyboard not working during boot-up. USB is a peripheral device, so it falls under 'peripherals'. The Q35 platform is known for better hardware support, including USB, but if the keyboard isn't recognized at boot, it's likely an issue with how devices are handled in that platform configuration.
+
+Other categories don't fit as well: it's not about translation errors, assembly issues, or network. It's specifically a hardware device (USB) problem on a specific platform, so 'peripherals' seems the best fit.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a USB device (keyboard) not functioning correctly during boot-up on a specific QEMU platform. This is related to hardware device handling, making 'peripherals' the appropriate category.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1712 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1712
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3722ea30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1712
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. The user is reporting an issue with the Arabic keyboard layout in QEMU. They mentioned that during compilation, xkb gives an error about symbols/ar not found. From their research, they know that Linux distros use "ara" for the Arabic layout, but QEMU has a folder named pc-bios/keymaps/ which contains "ar". 
+
+So, I need to classify this bug into one of the given categories. The possible options are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem here is related to keyboard layout mapping. QEMU handles input devices, including keyboards, so this likely falls under the 'peripherals' category because it's dealing with hardware input/output simulation. The error seems to be about file names or paths not matching what the system expects, which could relate to how QEMU loads and configures the keyboard mappings.
+
+I don't think it's a mistranslation since that usually refers to incorrect semantic mapping in user-mode assembly or IR. It doesn't seem to involve network, socket, or KVM directly either. The issue is more about the configuration of hardware peripherals, specifically the input device's keyboard layout. Therefore, 'peripherals' seems like the most appropriate category here.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to an incorrect file name causing a missing Arabic keyboard layout in QEMU. Since this involves the handling and configuration of hardware input devices, it falls under the 'peripherals' category.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1715203 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1715203
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d955e302
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1715203
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's break down this bug report. The user is talking about maintaining Haiku support in QEMU. They mention that the 2.10 release notes suggest dropping Haiku support, but it's still working as-is on Haiku. They're asking if there was a reason to drop it and what Haiku can do to prevent removal.
+
+So, first off, I need to classify this under one of the provided categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, etc. The report isn't about translation issues or assembly lowering, so those are out.
+
+Next, looking at the content, it's about supporting a specific operating system (Haiku) in QEMU. Since QEMU functions as a hypervisor and emulator for various hardware and OS environments, this falls under 'peripherals' because it relates to supporting additional platforms or devices that extend QEMU's capabilities beyond its primary functions.
+
+Therefore, the category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1719339 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1719339
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b6212d89
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1719339
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have this bug report about QEMU where it's saying "serial8250: too much work for irq3". The user provided some links to previous discussions and mentioned that the issue has been around since 2007 but hasn't been fixed yet. They also tried different versions of QEMU on various operating systems like Debian Stretch and Ubuntu, and it still happens when writing a lot to the console.
+
+I need to classify this bug into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, or other.
+
+First, let me understand what's happening. The error message mentions "serial8250", which refers to the 8250 UART serial controller emulation in QEMU. IRQ3 is one of the interrupt request lines for this device. So when it says "too much work for irq3", it suggests that the serial device is generating too many interrupts, causing high CPU usage or other issues.
+
+Looking at the provided links, they talk about adjusting the pass limit or removing messages. These seem to be attempts to handle the load on the serial device's interrupt handling. The problem seems related to how QEMU handles the serial port's interrupt generation when there's a lot of data being sent, which can lead to high CPU usage because the host is processing too many interrupts.
+
+Now, considering the categories:
+
+- **mistranslation**: This would relate to incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target. Doesn't seem to fit here since it's about serial device behavior.
+- **assembly lowering**: Related to converting code to assembly, not relevant here.
+- **device**: Since this is about a hardware device emulation (serial port), this category seems relevant.
+- **graphic, socket, network**: These are other areas, but the issue is with serial communication, so probably not these.
+- **KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor**: Let's see. KVM is about virtualization; this isn't directly a KVM issue. Boot is about starting up the VM, which doesn't seem to be the problem here. VNC and debug are for remote access and debugging tools respectively. Files and permissions are more about file handling. Performance could be a category since high CPU usage might be a performance issue, but the root cause is in device emulation.
+- **peripherals**: This includes devices like serial ports, which seems to fit.
+
+So, considering that the problem is with the 8250 serial device's interrupt handling under load, it falls under "device" or "peripherals". Since peripherals are more specific to hardware emulations, I think "peripherals" is a better fit. But sometimes "device" could also be considered. However, looking at the options, "peripherals" is explicitly listed as a category, so that might be more accurate.
+
+But wait, in the initial list of categories, "serial8250" relates to hardware emulation which falls under "peripherals". So yes, peripherals would be the correct classification.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses an issue with the serial8250 device in QEMU, specifically regarding excessive work on IRQ3. This pertains to hardware emulation under the peripherals category.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1721275 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1721275
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1c12f195
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1721275
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to figure out how to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user starts by saying it's an enhancement request, not a bug per se. They're asking if QEMU can support more ARM CPUs, specifically listing several Cortex models like M0, M4, and so on. They mention using QEMU for GCC validation to ensure code generation is correct for the target CPU.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+This isn't about translating code incorrectly (mistranslation) or assembly issues. It's more about adding support for new hardware models. Since it's about adding ARM CPU support in QEMU, which is a hypervisor or emulator managing virtual machines and devices, the right category should be 'peripherals' because they're adding support for specific hardware components (CPUs). Alternatively, since it's about supporting additional CPUs, maybe 'device' would fit, but 'peripherals' seems more precise as it refers to hardware components.
+
+Wait, the categories also include 'hypervisor', but that's more about the virtualization layer itself rather than the devices it supports. So I think 'peripherals' is better here because they're talking about adding support for specific CPU peripherals or models.
+</think>
+
+The user is requesting support for additional ARM CPUs in QEMU, which relates to hardware components (CPUs) being supported as peripherals.
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1722884 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1722884
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3eeca82d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1722884
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The problem described is that when a lot of mouse input events happen while keyboard keys are pressed, the scan code gets corrupted. This leads to erroneous behavior where the OS resets the keyboard, causing the mouse to fail until a restart. It specifically mentions that this only happens with the PS2 mouse and not the tablet input device.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+So, the issue is about how input devices (mouse) are handled when there's a lot of activity and keyboard interference. Since it's related to the mouse input causing corruption in scan codes and affecting device functionality, this seems like a hardware or peripheral problem. The fact that it's specific to PS2 mouse suggests it's an input device issue.
+
+I don't think it's about translation or assembly since the problem is with device interaction rather than code conversion. It's also not related to network, socket, or performance issues directly. KVM is mentioned as the guest OS, but the bug seems more about peripherals (mouse) misbehaving due to input handling problems.
+
+So, putting it together, the category should be 'peripherals' because it's dealing with how QEMU handles input devices and their interaction leading to device failure.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/174 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/174
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a67bc0d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/174
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report: "European keyboard PC-105 deadkey." Let me break it down.
+
+The user mentioned a "deadkey" issue with a European keyboard model PC-105. A dead key usually refers to a key that doesn't produce the correct character when pressed. In the context of QEMU, which is a hypervisor used for emulation and virtualization, this likely relates to how input devices are emulated.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: assembly, device, graphic, network, etc. "Device" seems relevant because it's about hardware input (keyboard) not functioning correctly in the VM. Peripheral might also be considered since keyboards are peripherals. However, 'device' is a more general category that could encompass this issue better.
+
+I think the best fit here is "device."
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions an issue with a European keyboard model PC-105 having a dead key, which relates to input device functionality. In QEMU's context, this falls under how input devices are handled, making it a 'peripherals' category.
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1747 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1747
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..61ce2a47
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1747
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report about QEMU. The user mentioned that eMMC support is missing as a storage type. Let me think through this.
+
+First, what categories are available? There's device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others like assembly or mistranslation.
+
+eMMC stands for embedded MultiMediaCard, which is a type of flash storage often used in devices like smartphones and memory cards. In the context of QEMU, this would relate to how the emulator handles storage devices.
+
+Looking at the bug report, it's about missing support for eMMC as a storage type. The user provided some links to past discussions in qemu-devel. These seem to be patches or RFCs related to adding eMMC support. For example, one is from 2011 and another recent attempt in 2023.
+
+So, the issue is about hardware emulation, specifically for storage devices. Since eMMC is a type of storage peripheral, this falls under the peripherals category. The other options like network or socket don't fit because those relate to communication protocols, not storage. Device might be a possible category too, but 'peripherals' seems more specific here.
+
+Therefore, the bug report should be categorized as 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to missing support for eMMC as a storage type in QEMU. Since eMMC is a storage device, this falls under the peripherals category.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1748756 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1748756
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bbfc3e90
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1748756
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is a feature request asking for support for TI AM1808 in Lego EV3 emulation. So it's about adding new hardware support rather than fixing a bug. The categories don't include a "feature request" option, so I have to choose the closest one.
+
+Looking at the options, "peripherals" seems appropriate because the AM1808 is a microcontroller used in peripherals like the EV3 brick. Adding support for it would involve integrating new hardware devices into QEMU.
+
+I should make sure none of the other categories fit better. It's not about translation or assembly issues, nor is it directly related to networking, graphics, etc. So "peripherals" is the best fit.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1772165 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1772165
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0eb25d3a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1772165
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. The user is reporting a bug in QEMU where USB support isn't working for ARM devices like Raspi2 or Raspi3. They're using QEMU 2.12.0 on ArchLinux and tried adding a USB device with the command `-usb -device usb-host,bus=001,...`. But when they run it, QEMU gives an error saying "Bus '001' not found."
+
+Hmm, so first, I need to classify this bug into one of the given categories. The options are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about USB not working in the emulation. USB support typically falls under hardware peripherals since it's dealing with devices connected to the system. In QEMU, peripherals usually refer to things like USB devices, serial ports, network adapters, etc. The user tried adding a USB host device but couldn't find the bus, which suggests that the USB subsystem isn't properly initialized or recognized in the ARM emulation.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'peripherals' seems appropriate because it's about hardware devices (USB) not functioning correctly within the emulated environment. Mistranslation might be related to incorrect mapping in the code, but this seems more like a missing feature or configuration issue with USB support rather than a translation error. Device could also fit, but I think peripherals is more specific here.
+
+So, the bug report is about the lack of USB support in the ARM emulation, which affects the ability to use USB devices within the emulated system. This points directly to a problem with how QEMU handles peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1773 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1773
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b6021e6d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1773
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report related to QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user described that when they plug two webcams into their desktop—one for the host and one for the VM—launching the QEMU VM causes it to use the desktop's webcam mic instead of the dedicated one. So, the issue is about QEMU incorrectly selecting which microphone to use for the VM.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem here seems related to how QEMU handles hardware devices. Specifically, it's about selecting which microphone (a peripheral device) is assigned to the VM versus the host. This sounds like a device management issue because QEMU isn't correctly assigning the intended webcam for the VM but instead grabs the host's mic.
+
+So, considering the categories, "device" seems appropriate because it pertains to how devices are handled and allocated within the VM environment. The other categories don't quite fit; for example, it's not a network or graphics issue. It's about device assignment, which falls under the 'peripherals' category, but since 'device' is an option, that might be more general.
+
+Wait, actually, looking back, there's a separate category called 'peripherals.' So should I choose 'peripherals' instead of 'device'? Hmm, but 'device' is also listed. In this case, the issue is specifically about audio devices (microphones), which are peripherals. However, 'peripherals' might be more specific than just 'device.' But since both categories exist, maybe I need to determine if 'peripherals' is a better fit.
+
+But looking at the list again: possible categories include 'other,' 'device,' and 'peripherals' as separate options. So perhaps the bug relates more to how QEMU handles device assignment for peripherals like webcams and mics. Therefore, it's likely under 'peripherals.'
+
+Wait no—the user is talking about the microphone part of the webcam. So maybe it's about audio devices, which could fall under 'device' or 'peripherals.' I'm a bit torn here.
+
+But considering that QEMU assigns hardware devices to VMs, this issue is about device assignment specifically for peripherals. Therefore, I think 'peripherals' is the more accurate category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report deals with QEMU incorrectly assigning the microphone from the host's webcam to the VM instead of using a dedicated one. This relates to how QEMU handles hardware devices, particularly peripherals like webcams and their microphones.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1778 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1778
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e0d38d2f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1778
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm looking at this bug report: "Spice audio play at wrong speed and frequency after qemu-7.2.0". So, first, I need to figure out what category this falls into based on the provided options.
+
+The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The issue is with Spice audio. I know that Spice is a remote desktop protocol used in QEMU/VirtualBox for providing GPU acceleration and multimedia support over the network. In this case, the problem is that the audio isn't playing at the correct speed or frequency.
+
+Looking at the categories, "graphic" might come to mind because graphics are often handled by Spice, but this is about audio. However, sometimes audio issues in virtualization can be tied to how devices are handled. But let's think again—Spice primarily deals with remote display and input, including maybe multimedia redirection, so perhaps it's more related to the device handling or peripherals.
+
+Wait, the problem is specifically with audio playback speed and frequency, which would likely involve how the audio data is being processed or transmitted over Spice. This could be a misconfiguration in how the audio is handled by QEMU when using Spice. Alternatively, maybe it's an issue with the way QEMU interacts with the host's audio drivers via Spice.
+
+Looking at the categories again: "device" seems relevant because it's about handling of the audio device or its functionality within the virtual machine. "Peripheral" might also be a fit since audio is typically handled by a sound card (a peripheral device). But I'm not sure if "peripherals" is more specific than "device".
+
+Alternatively, could this relate to performance? If the speed and frequency are wrong, maybe it's a timing issue in how data is processed, which might affect performance. However, the primary symptom points more towards incorrect audio handling rather than general performance.
+
+Considering that Spice is part of QEMU's device support for peripherals like audio, I think "peripherals" would be the most accurate category here because it's about the functionality of the audio peripheral within the virtual machine under QEMU.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1785485 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1785485
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..32b25376
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1785485
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The issue is about the mouse moving erratically when using the scroll wheel on certain Windows guests: NT 4, Windows 95, and Windows 3.1. The user thinks it might be due to a lack of support for the Microsoft Intellimouse in these OSes.
+
+So, first, I need to figure out what category this falls under. Let me look at the possible categories again:
+
+- mistranslation
+- assembly: assembly lowering
+- other
+- device
+- graphic
+- socket
+- network
+- KVM
+- boot
+- vnc
+- debug
+- files
+- permissions
+- performance
+- kernel
+- peripherals
+
+The problem is with mouse movement, specifically when using the scroll wheel. The mouse going haywire suggests an issue with how the mouse (as a device) is handled in QEMU.
+
+"Device" seems like a likely category because it's about hardware emulation. The mouse is a peripheral device, so issues with its behavior would fall under "peripherals." But wait, "device" and "peripherals" are separate options here. Let me think again: "peripherals" is more specific to input/output devices like mice, keyboards, etc.
+
+The problem occurs in the guests when using the scroll wheel, which is part of mouse functionality. Since it's about how the mouse behaves within the VM, this relates to the peripherals handling in QEMU. Therefore, the category should be "peripherals."
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1796816 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1796816
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..232b38c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1796816
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user is having issues with the keyboard in QEMU when running an OpenSUSE PowerPC system under Windows. They mention specific key mappings are incorrect, like \ rendering as # and so on.
+
+First, I should consider the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others. The issue is related to keyboard input which is a hardware peripheral.
+
+Looking at QEMU's components, it handles emulating hardware, including devices like the keyboard. If the keys aren't mapping correctly, this could be due to how QEMU emulates the keyboard device in the virtual machine. Since OpenSUSE is running without X11 (runlevel 3), the problem isn't graphical but rather input-related.
+
+So, it's likely a hardware emulation issue within QEMU, specifically with the keyboard as a peripheral device. Therefore, the category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes incorrect key mappings on the keyboard when running OpenSUSE PowerPC under QEMU on Windows. This is related to how the keyboard input is handled by QEMU's hardware emulation for peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1797033 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1797033
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a6307905
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1797033
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem again.
+
+The issue is about setting the RTC clock with a specific base datetime using the '-rtc clock=vm,base=<datetime>' option in QEMU. The user reports that when they set 'base', there's an arbitrary shift introduced at guest startup. This seems to affect determinism, especially in icount mode where precise timing matters.
+
+Looking into the problem details, it mentions that QEMU uses the host clock (via qemu_time()) during initialization phases before the guest starts. The 'rtc_date_offset' operations are done using this host time, which isn't relevant when 'clock=vm' is set because 'vm' clock should be managed by the virtual machine itself.
+
+The user explains that under certain conditions—like high CPU load on the host or starting just before a second boundary—the base datetime can have delays of 1 second or more. This inconsistency breaks determinism, meaning the same guest setup might behave differently upon startup if there's even a slight delay in QEMU initialization due to host load.
+
+Now, considering the categories provided:
+
+- Mistranslation: Doesn't fit here; it's about time management rather than incorrect semantic mapping.
+- Assembly lowering: Not relevant as this is not an assembly issue.
+- Other: Possible, but let's see if another category fits better.
+- Device/peripheral/kernel/hypervisor/network/etc.: The RTC is a hardware device emulated by QEMU, so 'peripherals' might be applicable. However, the core issue here seems to relate more to how time is being handled.
+
+Looking at the categories, there's also 'kernel', but that usually refers to the host OS kernel. Since this is about QEMU's handling of RTC and timing within the guest, 'peripherals' could make sense because RTC is a hardware peripheral emulated by QEMU.
+
+But wait, another angle: the issue is with how the base datetime is being set incorrectly in relation to the VM's clock. This affects determinism, which ties into precise timekeeping. Since it's about the RTC and the way time is initialized, perhaps 'peripherals' is the right category because RTC is a hardware device.
+
+Alternatively, since this is about time management within QEMU and how it interacts with the host's real-time functions (qemu_time()), maybe 'other' is more appropriate if none of the specific categories directly address timing or RTC issues. However, considering that RTC falls under peripherals, I think 'peripherals' would be the better fit.
+
+Wait, but looking back at the user's explanation, they mention that QEMU uses host time during initialization before guest startup, which affects the rtc_date_offset. This seems like a problem with how QEMU initializes the RTC and handles the clock sources. Since RTC is part of the peripherals in the VM, it should fall under 'peripherals'.
+
+So, I'm leaning towards 'peripherals' as the category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses an issue where specifying a base datetime for the RTC causes an arbitrary shift when using 'clock=vm'. This stems from QEMU relying on host time during initialization, affecting determinism in the guest. Since this pertains to the RTC hardware emulation within QEMU's peripherals, the appropriate category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/180 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/180
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8cb57ed2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/180
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "hardware-based time keeping" in QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me think through this step by step.
+
+First, I'll recall what each category generally covers:
+
+- Mistranslation: Issues with how code is translated from source to IR or target.
+- Assembly lowering: Problems during the conversion of high-level code to assembly.
+- Other: A catch-all for things that don't fit elsewhere.
+- Device: Probably relates to hardware devices in the VM.
+- Graphic: Issues with graphics rendering.
+- Socket: Networking socket-related problems.
+- Network: Broader network issues beyond sockets.
+- KVM: Kernel-based virtual machine specifics.
+- Boot: Problems during VM startup or booting.
+- VNC: Remote desktop access issues.
+- Debug: Debugging tools or related bugs.
+- Files: Filesystem operations.
+- Permissions: Access rights or permissions issues.
+- Performance: Slowness or efficiency problems.
+- Kernel: Issues with the hypervisor's kernel.
+- Peripherals: Hardware devices attached to the VM, like USB, serial ports, etc.
+- Hypervisor: General issues with the hypervisor layer.
+
+Now, "hardware-based time keeping" sounds like it relates to how the virtual machine manages time. In QEMU, this could involve features like the Real-Time Clock (RTC) or other hardware timers emulated by QEMU. These are part of the device emulation, specifically for peripherals because they're hardware components that the VM interacts with.
+
+So, timekeeping in a VM is handled through hardware devices, which falls under peripherals. Therefore, I think "peripherals" is the correct category here.
+</think>
+
+The bug report "hardware-based time keeping" relates to how QEMU manages time within a virtual machine, typically through emulated hardware devices like RTC or timers. These are part of device emulation for peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1800088 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1800088
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6681851b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1800088
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user mentioned an assertion fail while using USB camera redirect. The error happens when moving the camera lens left to right or up and down. The QEMU version is 2.10.0, and the error message points to "usbredirparser: error unexpected extra data ep 00" and an assertion failure in "hw/usb/redirect.c".
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is related to USB redirection. USB devices are handled under the "peripherals" category in QEMU because they're input/output devices connected via USB controllers. The error occurs during device interaction, specifically with a camera, which is a peripheral device.
+
+I don't think it's a translation or performance issue. It seems more like a problem with how the USB redirection is handling data, possibly an unexpected extra data packet causing the assertion failure. This points towards a bug in the USB redirection code, which falls under peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1808824 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1808824
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ce377e00
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1808824
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned issues with the mouse leaving the VM window when "Grab on Hover" isn't selected. They're using Windows 10 and Intel HAXM. 
+
+So, first, I need to understand what each category means. Looking at the list:
+
+- Mistranslation is about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture in user-mode.
+- Assembly lowering relates to assembly code issues.
+- Other is a catch-all.
+- Device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor are the other options.
+
+The problem here is with mouse behavior in the VM window. Mouse issues usually fall under input handling or graphical display problems. "Grab on Hover" sounds like it's related to how the VM window captures mouse input when hovering over it, which is a graphical user interface feature.
+
+Additionally, performance issues are mentioned when Intel HAXM isn't installed, causing slow response. But the primary issue seems to be with mouse control within the VM window, not necessarily performance-related. 
+
+Considering that, "peripherals" might be relevant because the mouse is an input device (peripheral) interacting with the VM. Alternatively, it could also relate to graphics since it's about the VM window's behavior.
+
+Wait, but the main issue isn't about graphical rendering per se but about the mouse not staying in the window as expected when a certain setting is off. That sounds more like an input handling problem within the VM's display, which might be under "graphic" or maybe "peripherals."
+
+Alternatively, since it's related to how the VM window manages mouse input, perhaps it's more about the graphical interface rather than hardware peripherals.
+
+But I'm not entirely sure. Maybe "other" is safer if none of the specific categories fit perfectly. However, considering that mouse control issues are common in virtualization and relate to how the hypervisor or VM handles input events, "peripherals" might be a better fit because it's about device (mouse) interaction within the VM.
+
+Wait, but "graphic" could also make sense because it's about the display window behavior. Hmm.
+
+I think the primary issue is with mouse movement and window management, which relates more to how the VM handles input devices, so "peripherals" would be appropriate. But I'm still a bit uncertain because sometimes these issues can fall under graphical handling.
+
+Alternatively, maybe "other" if it doesn't fit into any specific category. However, since peripherals are about devices interacting with the VM, and the mouse is a peripheral device, that might be the right choice.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1809291 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1809291
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..88ff592a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1809291
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user provided a detailed description of an issue where an SD Card isn't working in Ubuntu 18.10 using QEMU's ARM emulation. They mentioned that it worked fine in earlier versions but broke starting from 18.10.
+
+First, looking at the categories given: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is about an SD card not working in QEMU when using specific board configurations. The MMC driver worked before but now fails with certain commands timing out. Since the issue occurs during SD initialization and involves device-specific commands (CMD 2,3, etc.), it's related to hardware device emulation.
+
+In this case, the problem is likely within how QEMU emulates the SD card controller or the MMC interface on the ARM boards (versatilepb, realview-pb-a8, realview-pbx-a9). These are all peripherals attached to the system being emulated by QEMU. The failure points are during device initialization and specific command handling, which suggests a problem with the device emulation rather than something like network or graphics.
+
+So, considering the categories, "peripherals" seems the most fitting as it relates directly to the hardware devices (MMC/SD card) that aren't functioning correctly in the emulated environment. Other categories like 'network' or 'graphic' don't apply here since the issue is with storage devices.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where SD cards are not working in QEMU's ARM emulation under Ubuntu 18.10, specifically on certain board configurations (versatilepb, realview-pb-a8, realview-pbx-a9). The problem occurs during the initialization of SDC commands, leading to timeouts and subsequent failures in read/write operations. 
+
+This issue is related to the emulation of peripheral devices, particularly the MMC/SD card controller in QEMU for ARM-based systems. As it's a hardware device-related problem within the emulator, the appropriate category is "peripherals."
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/181 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/181
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..31d3be45
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/181
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "qemu crashes when doing iotest on virtio-9p filesystem". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I should understand what each category means. 
+
+Mistranslation is about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture in user-mode. Assembly lowering is related to converting high-level code to assembly. Other is for things that don't fit elsewhere.
+
+Device could be hardware-related issues, graphic for display problems, socket for networking connections, network for general networking bugs, KVM for virtualization issues under KVM, boot for startup problems, vnc for remote desktop issues, debug for logging or debugging tools, files for file handling, permissions for access rights, performance for speed issues, kernel for OS-related bugs in QEMU, peripherals for input/output devices, and hypervisor for issues related to the hypervisor layer.
+
+The bug report mentions QEMU crashing during an iotest on a virtio-9p filesystem. Virtio is part of QEMU's virtual I/O devices, specifically designed for better performance in virtualized environments. The 9P protocol is used for file sharing between the host and guest.
+
+So, this crash is happening when performing I/O tests on a filesystem using virtio-9p. Since it's related to filesystem operations within a virtual environment, it falls under the peripherals category because virtio devices are considered peripherals in QEMU/KVM setups.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1810000 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1810000
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4eefcf6b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1810000
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that the system emulator crashed when using the xhci USB controller with ausb-bt-dongle device. They provided details about the QEMU revision, the command line used, and an error message from core.c in the usb directory.
+
+First, I'll look at the error message: it's an assertion failure in usb_packet_copy where p->actual_length + bytes exceeds iov->size. This suggests something is wrong with how USB packets are being handled, possibly related to buffer overflows or incorrect lengths during data transfer.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. The crash is happening in the USB core code, so it's directly related to a peripheral device (the USB controller and dongle).
+
+Since this involves the USB subsystem within QEMU, which emulates devices for the VM, the category should be 'peripherals'. It doesn't seem like a mistranslation or assembly issue. Other categories like network or socket don't fit because it's specifically about USB.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1811916 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1811916
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c9378029
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1811916
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. The user provided a bug report about QEMU and wants me to classify it into one of several categories. The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report says that the SDL2 interface in QEMU didn't follow the X11 keyboard layout for hotkeys. The user was using Dvorak and found that pressing Ctrl-Alt-G didn't work as expected; they had to use a different key combination (Ctrl-Alt-I) because it uses raw key codes.
+
+So, the issue is with how input events are handled—specifically, QEMU isn't respecting the X11 keyboard layout. This affects the hotkeys and their functionality. Since it's related to handling keyboard events and not correctly translating them based on the system's configuration, this falls under input device or peripherals.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'peripherals' seems appropriate because it involves how the keyboard (a peripheral) is being handled by QEMU. It's not a translation issue in code (mistranslation), nor is it directly related to graphics or network handling.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1818398 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1818398
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..360ffc7d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1818398
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read through the report carefully.
+
+The user is using QEMU version 3.1.0-1 on Archlinux 64-bit. They're experiencing issues with the mouse not working when using evdev passthrough alongside virtio-vga or KVM. When they remove either virtio-vga or KVM, the mouse works fine.
+
+Looking at the command lines provided, the problematic one includes both `-accel kvm` and `-device virtio-vga`. The second example without these devices works as expected for the mouse.
+
+The issue is specific to the mouse when using evdev passthrough with either virtio-vga or KVM. The keyboard works fine in all cases, so it's not a general input problem but mouse-specific.
+
+Now, considering the categories: The bug relates to device passthrough, specifically mouse input, which falls under peripherals. It's not related to translation errors, assembly issues, performance, network, etc. Device passthrough is typically handled by how QEMU manages devices and their resources, so it fits into the 'peripherals' category.
+</think>
+
+The issue involves mouse input not working with evdev passthrough when using virtio-vga or KVM. Since this relates to device handling and input/output peripherals in QEMU, the correct category is:
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1824528 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1824528
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2ebe8e04
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1824528
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories. Let me read through the problem carefully.
+
+The user mentioned that QEMU fails to compile on GCC 9 with a specific error message about taking the address of a packed member resulting in an unaligned pointer value. The error occurs in `hw/usb/dev-mtp.c` at line 1708, specifically when compiling `dev-mtp.o`.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The error is related to compiling QEMU, which suggests it's a build-time issue. The specific error message points to an issue with the compiler treating a warning as an error regarding packed structures in USB device code. Since this occurs in `hw/usb/dev-mtp.c`, which deals with USB devices, I think this falls under 'peripherals' because it's related to hardware devices being handled by QEMU.
+
+Alternatively, could it be a mistranslation or assembly issue? The error is about pointer alignment in the source code, not directly about translation from one architecture to another or assembly lowering. It seems more like a build-time warning turned into an error due to GCC 9's stricter checks on packed structures, which are part of the USB device handling.
+
+So, the most fitting category is 'peripherals' as it relates to how QEMU handles USB devices and their structs.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a compilation error in the `hw/usb/dev-mtp.c` file, specifically when taking the address of a packed member. This pertains to the USB device handling code, making it fall under the 'peripherals' category.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1824704 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1824704
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0a0beb9e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1824704
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report related to QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem carefully.
+
+The user mentions that the Turkish (tr) keyboard isn't working after a specific version of QEMU, v20171217. They tried different images like FreeDOS, WinPE, and Linux, but none work with the Turkish keyboard layout. Specifically, pressing certain keys results in incorrect characters being displayed. For example, pressing "ç" shows ",", and pressing "." shows "ç". The user notes that the keyboard always defaults to "en-us", which isn't desired.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about a keyboard not functioning correctly in QEMU. Since it's related to input devices and specifically the keyboard layout mapping, this seems like a problem with how the keyboard device is handled. Therefore, the category should be 'peripherals' because it's dealing with hardware input devices within the virtual machine environment.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1825452 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1825452
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9d55378e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1825452
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report about QEMU where the Pulse Audio backend isn't working. Let's see what the user provided.
+
+The bug report says that when using QEMU v4.0.0-rc4 on Gentoo Linux, the Pulse Audio backend doesn't initialize because of an issue in audio/paaudio.c. The specific problem is that XDG_RUNTIME_DIR isn't set, and there's no /run/user directory on their system.
+
+First, I should look at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. So, these are all possible areas.
+
+The bug is related to Pulse Audio, which is part of the audio backend in QEMU. The error occurs because XDG_RUNTIME_DIR isn't set, which means the code is trying to access a directory that doesn't exist on their system. Since they're using Gentoo, maybe it's configured differently, or perhaps /run/user isn't mounted by default.
+
+Looking at the categories, I don't see 'audio' as an option. The closest might be 'device', but that usually refers to hardware devices. Another thought: Pulse Audio is a sound server, which falls under peripherals because it handles audio output. So maybe 'peripherals' would be the right category here.
+
+Wait, but let me think again. The error message is about not being able to find the runtime directory and the pulse server configuration file. This might also relate to files or permissions since the issue is with environment variables and directories, which are more system-related rather than device hardware.
+
+However, considering that Pulse Audio is a sound backend for QEMU, it's part of the peripherals handling in QEMU. The problem isn't with the device itself but with how QEMU interacts with the audio system. So maybe 'peripherals' makes sense here because it's about external devices (like audio) that QEMU manages.
+
+Alternatively, if the issue is related to environment variables and file paths, perhaps 'files' or 'permissions' could be categories. But those are more general, and since it's specifically about the audio backend not initializing due to missing directories, I think 'peripherals' is a better fit because it directly relates to how QEMU handles audio output.
+
+I don't see any other category that fits this bug. It's definitely not about translation issues, assembly, or network-related problems. So yeah, 'peripherals' seems appropriate.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1832 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1832
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0ea28153
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1832
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "i386 test registers are not handled" in QEMU. Let me think through each possible category.
+
+First, "mistranslation" is about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture during user-mode assembly lowering. This doesn't seem to fit because the issue is about registers not being handled, which might be more related to hardware handling rather than semantic translation.
+
+Next, "assembly": Maybe it's an issue with how assembly code is generated or optimized, but again, I'm not sure if that's the primary concern here.
+
+"Device" could relate to devices in the emulated environment. If test registers are part of device emulation, maybe this falls under device handling. But I'm not certain yet.
+
+"Graphic": Probably relates more to display output, which doesn't seem relevant here.
+
+"Socket": Unrelated, as sockets involve networking and inter-process communication, which isn't mentioned.
+
+"Network": Also unrelated unless test registers are part of network device emulation, but that's a stretch.
+
+"KVM": KVM is a hypervisor, so maybe if this affects virtualization under KVM, but the report doesn't specify it's related to KVM specifically.
+
+"Boot": If the issue occurs during system boot, but the report doesn't mention booting problems.
+
+"VNC": Unrelated unless remote access via VNC isn't working due to test registers, which is unlikely.
+
+"Debug": Could be about debugging tools or functionality, but the bug seems more about register handling rather than debugging features.
+
+"Files/permissions": Probably not related since it's about registers, not file operations or permissions.
+
+"Performance": Unless handling these registers affects performance, but the issue is about them not being handled at all, not performance degradation.
+
+"Kernel": If QEMU's kernel part isn't handling these registers correctly, maybe. But I'm not sure if "kernel" refers to the host OS kernel or something else in QEMU.
+
+"Peripherals": Test registers might be part of emulated peripherals, so this could fit here. It suggests that certain registers aren't being properly managed by the emulation.
+
+"Hypervisor": Since KVM is a hypervisor and QEMU can run as a hypervisor under KVM, but again, unless it's specific to hypervisor functions.
+
+Putting it all together, "peripherals" seems like the most fitting category because test registers are likely part of some peripheral device's state or functionality that QEMU emulates. If they're not handled, it points to an issue in how peripherals are managed.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1838475 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1838475
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1c005fd6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1838475
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm looking at this bug report for QEMU where the system exits when using floating point instructions on a Cortex-M4 and an IRQ occurs. The user mentioned that CPACR.CP10 and CPACR.CP11 are set correctly, but NSACR isn't a register in Cortex-M4. 
+
+First, I need to classify this bug into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is happening during emulation of a Cortex-M4 processor. The problem arises when a floating-point instruction is executed and then an IRQ occurs, leading to QEMU exiting with specific error messages related to SecureFaults and exceptions. Since this involves the interaction between the CPU core (Cortex-M4) and the handling of IRQs, it seems to be a hardware emulation issue rather than something purely in user-mode or assembly lowering.
+
+The tags include 'cpu', 'irq', and 'cortex-m4', which points towards a device-related problem. The cortex-m4 is part of the peripherals being emulated by QEMU, so this likely falls under the 'peripherals' category.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1845 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1845
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4fb2cd85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1845
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU where qemu-xhci isn't working on aarch64. The user mentioned that when they run lsusb inside the VM, no devices are listed. Let me think about what categories are available.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is with qemu-xhci not working. Qemu-xhci is part of QEMU's USB controller for virtual machines. Since it's related to the xHCI (USB 3.0) controller and the VM isn't detecting devices, this seems to be a hardware-related problem in the virtual machine setup.
+
+So, considering the categories, 'peripherals' makes sense because it's about how the VM's hardware devices are emulated or handled. The USB devices aren't showing up, which points towards a problem with the peripherals configuration or handling in QEMU on aarch64 systems.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to the virtual machine's USB device emulation not working correctly, so the category falls under 'peripherals'.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1854878 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1854878
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..16332641
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1854878
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories for QEMU. The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue described is about a USB thumbdrive being treated as read-only even after specifying the 'raw' format. The user ran QEMU with '-drive file=\\.\PhysicalDrive1,format=raw' expecting it to allow writes, but still faced read-only behavior. However, when using the 'snapshot' option, writes worked correctly.
+
+This problem relates to how QEMU handles physical drives and their write permissions. Since the drive is a physical device connected to the host, QEMU might impose restrictions even if the format is specified as raw. This could be an issue with how QEMU interacts with hardware devices, specifically USB peripherals.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'peripherals' seems appropriate because it's related to handling input/output devices like USB drives. Other options like 'device' or 'hardware' aren't listed, so 'peripherals' is the closest fit.
+</think>
+
+The bug report deals with QEMU incorrectly treating a physical USB drive as read-only despite specifying raw format, which relates to how QEMU interacts with hardware peripherals.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1857269 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1857269
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0758ea2c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1857269
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. The user mentioned that the keyboard isn't working fully on the Windows version of QEMU. They're using a Spanish keyboard layout but it's not functioning correctly in their MS-DOS VM.
+
+First, I need to understand what each category means. Let me go through them:
+
+- **mistranslation**: This would be about incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target, usually happening in user-mode.
+- **assembly**: Issues related to assembly lowering during compilation.
+- **device**: Probably relates to hardware devices not working correctly.
+- **graphic**: Graphics-related bugs.
+- **socket**: Networking socket issues.
+- **network**: General network problems.
+- **KVM**: Kernel-based Virtual Machine hypervisor issues.
+- **boot**: Booting problems in VMs.
+- **vnc**: VNC remote desktop protocol issues.
+- **debug**: Debugging tools or logs not working.
+- **files**: File handling issues (opening, saving, etc.).
+- **permissions**: Access permission problems.
+- **performance**: Performance issues like slowness.
+- **kernel**: Issues with the QEMU kernel or OS being emulated.
+- **peripherals**: Problems with hardware peripherals in VMs.
+- **hypervisor**: Bugs related to the hypervisor layer.
+
+The user's issue is about a keyboard layout not working correctly. The keyboard is a peripheral input device. In this case, the problem is that the Spanish (Spain) keyboard layout isn't mapped properly, causing some keys not to function as expected. This seems to be a hardware emulation issue specific to peripherals within the virtual machine.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'peripherals' fits because it's about the emulation of physical devices in QEMU. The user is experiencing issues with input device functionality, which falls under peripheral handling.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where the keyboard layout isn't functioning correctly in a VM, specifically related to hardware peripherals.
+
+**Step-by-step explanation:**
+1. The problem involves a keyboard layout not working as expected in QEMU.
+2. This is related to input device emulation within the virtual machine.
+3. The category 'peripherals' covers issues with emulating physical devices like keyboards.
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1859081 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1859081
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7cd86092
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1859081
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user is having trouble with the mouse moving too fast when using a Mac OS 9 guest inside a Qemu VM on Windows. They tried adjusting settings and changing resolutions but it didn't help.
+
+First, I need to look at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is with mouse movement speed. Mouse devices are typically handled by the Input subsystem. In QEMU, this would involve the device handling or how the peripherals are emulated. Since the problem is specific to mouse input, it's likely a peripheral issue rather than something related to translation errors, graphics rendering, networking, or other categories.
+
+I don't see any mention of VNC directly causing the issue; the user just used it as one of the connection methods. It's more about how the mouse events are being processed by QEMU's peripherals handling. So the category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1859378 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1859378
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..eee61d1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1859378
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that it's part of qemu, but the specific issue is about xHCI Control Transfers requiring a Status TRB before starting the transfer. Let me think through this step by step.
+
+First, I need to understand what the bug is about. From the description, it seems like the problem is with how USB control transfers are handled in QEMU's xhci implementation. The user explains that for a control transfer, there's a setup packet, optional data packets, and then a status packet if everything goes well. If there's no data, the host doesn't send a status packet.
+
+The current code in hcd-xhci.c is checking whether a Status TRB is present on the ring before starting the control transfer. The user argues that this isn't necessary because the status TRB should be added after successful setup and data transfers, not beforehand. They suggest removing the check at line 1701.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is related to how USB transfers are handled. Since xHCI is part of USB host controller emulation in QEMU, which falls under peripherals. The issue is about correctly handling the transfer process, not a direct translation error or assembly issue. So categories like mistranslation or assembly lowering don't fit here.
+
+So, considering all this, the most appropriate category is 'peripherals' because it's dealing with USB device emulation in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1859384 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1859384
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..05782e95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1859384
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user provided a detailed description about an issue with the GIC (General Interrupt Controller) in ARM systems. Let me break it down.
+
+The problem revolves around how interrupts are being handled. Specifically, when using 1-N level-sensitive interrupts, multiple cores are acknowledging the same interrupt before it's deactivated. This shouldn't happen because only one CPU should acknowledge such an interrupt until it becomes inactive.
+
+Looking at the details, the user mentions that arm_gic_common_reset resets all irq_state[id] fields to 0, forcing all IRQs into the N-N model unless s->revision is set correctly for GICv2. This seems like a configuration issue where QEMU isn't setting the correct behavior for different GIC versions.
+
+Another point is that gic_acknowledge_irq calls gic_clear_pending using GIC_DIST_CLEAR_PENDING, which doesn't work properly for level-sensitive interrupts on GICv2. The user notes that this leads to pending interrupts not being cleared correctly across other cores.
+
+The bug report also touches on potential race conditions in the acknowledgment logic when multiple threads are involved, suggesting concurrency issues might contribute to the problem.
+
+Now, considering the categories: Mistranslation is about incorrect mapping from source to target; Assembly lowering relates to how assembly code is handled. The issue here seems more about interrupt controller behavior and handling across cores, which falls under kernel or hypervisor functions.
+
+Looking at the options provided, "kernel" might seem relevant since it's part of the operating system's interrupt handling, but in this case, QEMU emulates hardware, including the GIC as part of the device emulation. So, it's more about how peripherals are handled, specifically devices related to interrupt controllers.
+
+Therefore, the appropriate category is likely "peripherals" because it's dealing with the behavior of a specific hardware component (GIC) within the emulator.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses issues with the GIC interrupt controller in QEMU, particularly regarding how interrupts are acknowledged and cleared across multiple cores. The problem lies in the handling of 1-N level-sensitive interrupts, where the current implementation allows multiple CPUs to acknowledge the same interrupt before it's deactivated. This is a misconfiguration issue where QEMU isn't correctly setting the GIC state for different versions (GICv2), leading to improper behavior.
+
+The key points are:
+
+- The GIC reset function incorrectly sets all IRQ states, forcing them into N-N mode.
+- `gic_clear_pending` uses an incorrect method (`GIC_DIST_CLEAR_PENDING`) that doesn't work properly for level-sensitive interrupts on GICv2.
+- There's a possibility of race conditions in the acknowledgment logic when multiple threads are involved.
+
+Given these points, the bug relates to how the QEMU emulator handles specific hardware components (the GIC) and their behavior. This falls under the category of "peripherals" as it pertains to device emulation within the hypervisor environment.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
+
+The bug report describes an issue with the GIC interrupt controller's handling of 1-N level-sensitive interrupts, which is a problem in how hardware devices are emulated in QEMU. This falls under the category of "peripherals."
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1861458 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1861458
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..61e8e591
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1861458
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories. The categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is about a clock drift issue with the "-soundhw hda" option in QEMU. The user mentions that when using the qemu hda audio device, the timestamps for audio buffers are incorrect, leading to a clock drift of about 0.1% or 1ms every second. This affects applications like WASAPI on Windows running inside a QEMU VM.
+
+First, I should understand what each category means:
+
+- **mistranslation**: Issues with mapping source architecture to target IR.
+- **assembly**: Problems in assembly lowering.
+- **other**: Any other issue that doesn't fit into specific categories.
+- **device**: Relates to hardware devices or device emulation.
+- **graphic**: Graphics-related bugs.
+- **socket**: Network socket issues.
+- **network**: Networking problems not related to sockets.
+- **KVM**: Kernel-based Virtual Machine hypervisor issues.
+- **boot**: Booting problems in the VM.
+- **vnc**: VNC remote desktop issues.
+- **debug**: Debugging tools or logs.
+- **files**: File handling bugs.
+- **permissions**: Permission-related issues.
+- **performance**: Performance degradation, like speed issues.
+- **kernel**: Kernel-level problems in the hypervisor.
+- **peripherals**: Issues with peripheral devices (e.g., USB, audio).
+- **hypervisor**: General hypervisor-related bugs.
+
+The problem here is specifically with the sound hardware emulation (-soundhw hda). The user is experiencing incorrect timestamps for audio buffers. Since this relates to the timing of events in the audio device emulation, it's directly tied to how QEMU emulates the audio hardware.
+
+Looking at the categories, "peripherals" seems appropriate because it involves the emulation of a hardware device (HDA sound card) within the VM. The issue isn't with the hypervisor itself but rather how the peripheral device is being handled in terms of timing and data reporting.
+
+Other possible categories to consider: 
+
+- **device**: This could also fit, as it's about a device (audio). But "peripherals" is more specific since it refers to hardware devices emulated by QEMU.
+  
+- **performance**: While there's a performance aspect (drift over time), the primary issue is with the correctness of timestamps rather than overall speed.
+
+Therefore, the most accurate category is **peripherals** because it pertains to the emulation and behavior of the audio device within the virtual machine.
+</think>
+
+The bug report concerns an issue with the timing of audio buffer timestamps when using the HDA sound hardware in QEMU. Since this relates directly to the behavior of a peripheral device (HDA audio) within the VM, the appropriate category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1863526 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1863526
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1f1b2ab5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1863526
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, it's about the NVIC CCR register not being 8-bit accessible using Cortex-M4. The logs show errors like "Bad write of size 1" when trying to write to certain offsets (0xd15, 0xd16, etc.). 
+
+The NVIC is part of the ARM Cortex-M4 processor, which handles system exceptions and interrupts. It seems the issue is with how QEMU's emulation of the NVIC sysregs is handling writes of size 1 byte. The error messages indicate that writes of size 1 are not allowed at specific addresses.
+
+Since this relates to the behavior of the NVIC in the emulated environment, it's likely a problem with the device-specific hardware emulation in QEMU. Therefore, the category should be 'peripherals' because NVIC is part of the peripheral devices handled by the emulator.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1863601 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1863601
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..643ad1e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1863601
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The user mentioned that they can't type the "|" character on a French keyboard; instead, it's showing "<". 
+
+Looking at the possible categories, I see options like device, graphic, network, etc. Since the issue is related to input handling and keyboard behavior, it likely falls under the "input" category. However, checking the provided list, there isn't an "input" option. The closest might be "keyboard", but wait, "keyboard" isn't listed either.
+
+Wait, looking again: the options are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals. Hmm. 
+
+The problem is about keyboard input not working correctly, specifically with a French layout. So it's related to hardware input handling. Since keyboards are considered peripherals, the correct category here would be "peripherals". But wait, looking back, maybe I missed something.
+
+Alternatively, since it's about character mapping and how keys translate into characters, perhaps it's a translation issue. That could fall under "mistranslation", but that term is more specific to compiler or interpreter issues, not necessarily keyboard layouts.
+
+Another angle: the bug might be in the way the virtual machine handles keyboard input, which could relate to device emulation. So "device" might be appropriate because it's about how the VM emulates a keyboard.
+
+Wait, I'm a bit confused. Let me think again. The user can't type "|" and gets "<" instead. This sounds like an issue with the keyboard mapping within QEMU, specifically for French layouts. Since this is related to input handling in the virtual machine, it's likely under the "peripherals" category because keyboards are peripherals.
+
+But I'm not 100% sure if "peripherals" includes all input devices or just physical hardware connected to the VM. Alternatively, maybe it's a translation issue between the host and guest OS, which could be part of device handling. So perhaps "device" is more accurate.
+
+Wait, but in QEMU, when you use a French keyboard layout, that's part of the virtual machine's input configuration. It's handled by the VM's keyboard driver, so it's under peripherals. Therefore, I think "peripherals" is the right category.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1871267 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1871267
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cfc2926d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1871267
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. So, the user is experiencing an issue where pressing a key multiple times results in the same key being repeated several times on macOS when using QEMU with either gtk or VNC on a Windows host. They mentioned that it works fine under Linux KVM.
+
+First, I need to look at the possible categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem seems related to input handling since it's about keystrokes repeating. The user is using VNC and possibly SPICE (which is the gtk part), so the issue might be with how QEMU handles keyboard events through these interfaces.
+
+Looking at the categories, "network" could be a possibility because VNC communicates over network connections. If there's an issue in how the keystrokes are sent or received over the network, that might cause repetition. Alternatively, it could also relate to device handling, as the keyboard is a peripheral device.
+
+Wait, but another angle: since this is specific to macOS guests and happens through VNC/SPICE, maybe it's related to the way QEMU emulates the keyboard for the guest OS. This could fall under "peripherals" because the keyboard is a peripheral device being emulated by QEMU. If there's an issue in how the input events are handled or translated when using these graphical interfaces, that might be causing the problem.
+
+I should also consider other categories like "debug" or "performance," but those don't seem directly related to keystroke repetition. The user didn't mention performance issues or debugging features, so probably not.
+
+Between "network" and "peripherals," I think "peripherals" is more accurate because it's about the input device (keyboard) emulation in QEMU, which interacts with the guest OS. Network would be more about data transfer, but here the issue is with the input handling itself.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1873335 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1873335
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..02172523
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1873335
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I've got this bug report about QEMU where the NumLock isn't working properly when using DOS under QEMU. The user is reporting that they can't turn on NumLock for input numbers, which affects games that require it. They mentioned testing both Windows and Linux builds.
+
+First, I need to classify this issue into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, or other.
+
+The problem is related to the keyboard functionality in DOS under QEMU. NumLock not working correctly suggests an issue with how the keyboard input is being handled, possibly at the device level. Since it's about peripheral devices (the keyboard) and how QEMU emulates them, I'm leaning towards 'peripherals' as the category.
+
+I should also consider other possibilities to make sure I'm correct. It doesn't seem related to assembly lowering or mistranslation because those would be more about code translation issues rather than input handling. Graphic and network don't fit here either since the issue is with keyboard input, not display or networking. KVM is about virtualization for full OS runs, which might not apply directly here since it's a DOS environment. Boot isn't relevant to input during runtime.
+
+So yes, 'peripherals' seems like the right category because it deals with hardware device emulation, specifically the keyboard.
+</think>
+
+The issue relates to keyboard functionality in QEMU under DOS, particularly with NumLock handling. This is an input device problem, making 'peripherals' the appropriate category.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1873337 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1873337
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ac00237f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1873337
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user is experiencing an issue where arrow keys are being doubled in certain DOS programs when using QEMU. They provided examples like File Wizard and Scandisk, which suggests that this isn't isolated to a single application but rather a broader input handling problem.
+
+First, I need to consider the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. 
+
+The issue is about arrow keys being doubled, which relates to how input (keyboard) events are handled by QEMU. Since the user is working with DOS machines under QEMU, this likely involves the emulation of keyboard input in the virtual machine. The problem seems to stem from incorrect handling of key presses, possibly due to a misconfiguration or bug in how QEMU maps physical keyboard inputs to the virtual environment.
+
+I don't think it's related to assembly lowering because that would pertain more to code translation issues rather than input events. Mistranslation could be a consideration if it's about how the keys are being translated from the host to the guest OS, but the issue here is more about the number of key presses rather than semantic mapping.
+
+Looking at other categories: device might relate to hardware devices in general, but peripherals seem more specific to input devices like the keyboard. Peripherals would cover the handling of devices such as keyboards, mice, etc., which directly relates to this bug. The issue isn't related to graphics (graphic), network, sockets, or KVM specifics. It's also not a boot issue or something with VNC, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, or hypervisor.
+
+So, the most fitting category is peripherals because it deals with how input devices are emulated and handled in the virtual environment.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1874904 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1874904
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5ba6168d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1874904
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU not working as expected with a French AZERTY keyboard when using GTK on Windows 10. Let me break down the problem step by step.
+
+First, the user is running QEMU on Windows 10 with the GTK display option and specifies the keyboard layout as French ('-k fr'). However, instead of the emulated keypad showing AZERTY (which matches the French layout), it's displaying QWERTY. They tried the same command on Linux, and it worked fine, so the issue seems specific to Windows 10 with GTK.
+
+Looking at the possible categories, I need to figure out which one best fits this scenario. The options are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is related to how the keyboard layout is handled when using QEMU's GTK display on Windows. The correct key mapping isn't applied, causing the keypad to appear in the wrong layout. This seems like an issue with input handling or device emulation, specifically how the keyboard events are translated within the emulator.
+
+Considering the categories, 'peripherals' would encompass devices like keyboards and their configurations within QEMU. Since this is about the keyboard not working correctly under specific conditions (Windows 10, GTK), it falls into how QEMU handles peripherals, particularly input devices.
+
+I don't think it's a mistranslation issue because that typically refers to incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target, which doesn't directly apply here. It's more about the device configuration and input handling rather than assembly or performance issues.
+
+So, putting it all together, the most appropriate category for this bug is 'peripherals' since it relates to how QEMU handles the keyboard device under certain conditions.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where QEMU on Windows 10 with GTK display does not correctly apply the French AZERTY keyboard layout when specified. The problem occurs only in this specific setup, as running the same command on Linux works fine. This suggests that there's a misconfiguration or incorrect handling of the keyboard input device within QEMU under these conditions.
+
+The key points to consider are:
+1. **Environment**: Windows 10 with GTK display.
+2. **Configuration**: The French AZERTY keyboard layout is explicitly set using '-k fr'.
+3. **Symptoms**: The emulated keypad remains in QWERTY instead of switching to AZERTY, which is the expected behavior based on the configuration.
+
+Given that the issue pertains to how the input device (keyboard) is handled within QEMU's environment, the most fitting category is 'peripherals'. This aligns with issues related to hardware emulation or device configuration in QEMU.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1875 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1875
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..30a90bd7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1875
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let me try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user is having an issue with QEMU where it's giving a warning about not finding a scancode for keysym 65483 when they try to bind F14 to another key. They mention that xmodmap works fine and xev shows the correct key press, but their Windows VM isn't recognizing the binding.
+
+First, I need to understand what's happening here. QEMU is a hypervisor used for running virtual machines. When it comes to handling input devices, especially keyboards, there might be some translation issues between the host system (in this case, presumably Linux) and the guest OS (Windows 10).
+
+The error message mentions "no scancode found for keysym 65483." A scancode is a hardware-level code representing a key press, while a keysym is part of the X Window System's way of representing keys. So, QEMU might be trying to map the keysym from the host to a scancode that the guest OS (Windows) can understand.
+
+The user tried using xmodmap to remap keycode 148 to F14 and other modifiers, which worked on the host side, but the VM isn't recognizing it. This suggests an issue with how QEMU handles keyboard events or translates them between the host and guest environments.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, etc.
+
+This seems related to input devices because it's about keybindings not working correctly in a VM. Since QEMU handles virtual devices, particularly the keyboard and mouse, this would fall under the "peripherals" category. The problem is with how the hypervisor (QEMU) translates or passes through certain keys to the guest OS.
+
+Another possible category could be "input," but that's not listed. However, since peripherals include input devices like keyboards, "peripherals" seems appropriate.
+</think>
+
+The issue relates to keyboard mapping between the host and guest in QEMU, which falls under handling of input devices (peripherals). 
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1876187 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1876187
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3662da1d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1876187
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The issue is that QEMU freezes when using the SystickTimer on the netduinoplus2 platform. From the description, it seems like there's a problem with the system_clock_scale variable not being set, causing an infinite loop in the timer.
+
+First, I need to understand what each category means. The possible categories include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others.
+
+The problem is related to the SystickTimer, which I know is part of ARM's real-time clock subsystem. The bug report mentions that system_clock_scale isn't set, leading to a loop because systick_timer->tick doesn't change. This sounds like a hardware timer issue on the netduinoplus2 platform.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'peripherals' seems appropriate since it's dealing with hardware components like timers. Alternatively, it could be related to the device itself, but peripherals is more specific to hardware devices and their drivers.
+
+I don't think it's about assembly translation or performance here; it's a specific bug in how the timer is handled. It's not network-related or graphic either. So, 'peripherals' fits best because it's an issue with a hardware component (the SystickTimer) not functioning correctly due to incorrect scaling.
+</think>
+
+The issue involves a hardware component (SystickTimer) not being properly configured on a specific platform, leading to a loop. This falls under the category of peripherals as it relates to handling hardware devices and their drivers.
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1878134 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1878134
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9517acf8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1878134
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let's look at the details provided.
+
+The user reported assertion failures in `ati_reg_read_offs` and `ati_reg_write_offs`. The error message mentions an issue with `extract32`, specifically that the start value is negative or the length exceeds 32 - start. This suggests a problem with how bits are being manipulated, which ties into the bit operations functions.
+
+Looking at the stack trace, the failures occur in `ati_mm_read` and `memory_region_read_accessor`. These functions are related to memory management and device emulation, particularly for VGA devices like the ATI video card.
+
+The provided commands involve interacting with I/O ports (`outl`, `outw`) and memory addresses. The user is using QEMU's test interface to trigger specific behaviors that lead to the assertion failure. This points towards issues in how the emulator handles device-specific operations, especially with peripherals like the VGA controller.
+
+Considering the categories:
+- **mistranslation**: Doesn't seem right since this isn't about translating machine code.
+- **assembly**: Lowering assembly might be involved but not directly.
+- **device/peripherals**: These are more related to hardware emulation. Since it's an ATI VGA device, "peripherals" fits well.
+
+Other categories like network or socket don't apply here. The core issue is with how the emulator handles device register reads/writes, which falls under peripherals.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves issues in the `ati_reg_read_offs` and `ati_reg_write_offs` functions, which are part of the ATI VGA emulation in QEMU. The assertion failures occur during bit manipulation operations, specifically when extracting 32-bit values with invalid start or length parameters. These functions handle I/O operations for the ATI device, indicating a problem with how the emulator processes device-specific register accesses. Since this relates to hardware device emulation, the appropriate category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1878645 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1878645
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..037a238f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1878645
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have this bug report from QEMU where a null pointer dereference occurs in the function ich9_apm_ctrl_changed. The user provided a detailed backtrace showing that the issue stems from the tcg_handle_interrupt function, specifically when accessing a "cpu" pointer which might be causing the problem. They also mentioned that this seems specific to QTest.
+
+First, I need to understand what each part of the bug report means. The error is a null pointer dereference, which usually happens when a program tries to access memory using a null pointer, leading to a crash. In this case, it's happening in tcg_handle_interrupt, but according to the backtrace, the root cause is in ich9_apm_ctrl_changed.
+
+Looking at the function names, ich9_apm_ctrl_changed suggests it's related to the APM (Advanced Power Management) control in theICH9 chipset simulation. The APM is part of the hardware emulation for devices like USB controllers or other peripherals.
+
+The backtrace shows that this function calls cpu_interrupt, which then leads into tcg_handle_interrupt. Since QEMU uses TCG (Translation and Compilation) to accelerate guest code execution, any issues in the TCG handling can lead to such crashes.
+
+Now, considering the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals. The function names point towards hardware emulation, specifically APM and ICH9, which fall under peripherals.
+
+So, this bug is likely related to how QEMU handles a specific peripheral device (ICH9's APM), causing an incorrect pointer dereference when processing an interrupt.
+</think>
+
+The bug occurs in the ich9_apm_ctrl_changed function, which deals with hardware emulation, specifically a peripheral device. 
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1878915 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1878915
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..de81c2a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1878915
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me go through it step by step.
+
+First, looking at the error message: "util/fdmon-io_uring.c:95: get_sqe: Assertion `ret > 1' failed." This suggests there's an issue with a function called get_sqe in the file util/fdmon-io_uring.c. The assertion is failing because 'ret' isn't greater than 1.
+
+The stack trace shows that this leads to __kernel_vsyscall, which then calls otherlibc functions, eventually reaching the get_sqe function. From there, it goes through several QEMU functions like add_poll_add_sqe and fill_sq_ring, leading down into block operations and eventually to helper_outb.
+
+Looking at the steps provided, the user created a floppy disk image with 3840K using qemu-img, formatted it, and then ran dosfsck in the guest. The assertion failure happens during this process.
+
+The file involved is fdmon-io_uring.c, which relates to I/O operations, specifically using io_uring for asynchronous I/O. So this seems related to how QEMU handles I/O requests, possibly through the aio (asynchronous I/O) layer.
+
+The categories provided are: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Since this is related to file operations and I/O handling, but not directly tied to a specific category like network or graphics. The error occurs in the aio_poll function, which suggests it's part of QEMU's asynchronous I/O subsystem. However, looking at the categories, there isn't an 'aio' or 'I/O' category.
+
+The most fitting category might be 'other', as it doesn't fit into specific hardware-related categories like device (which would involve hardware emulation) but is more about internal I/O handling. Alternatively, since it's related to file operations and async I/O, perhaps 'files' could be a possibility, but the error message points more towards an assertion in the I/O ring setup.
+
+Wait, another angle: fdmon-io_uring.c is part of QEMU's block layer for floppy drives? The steps mention creating a floppy image. So maybe it's related to the floppy device emulation. But looking at the stack trace, after aio_poll comes blk_prw and blk_pread, which are block layer functions.
+
+The error occurs when attempting to read from the floppy in the guest, so perhaps this is an issue with how QEMU handles I/O for block devices. The 'peripherals' category might be appropriate because it's related to device emulation (floppy drive) and its associated I/O operations.
+
+Alternatively, since the issue is within the I/O handling code (io_uring), which is part of the aio subsystem, maybe it's not directly a hardware peripheral but more about how QEMU manages asynchronous I/O for block devices. However, given that the stack trace leads to fdctrl functions and eventually to helper_outb, which interacts with the floppy controller, perhaps 'peripherals' is still the best fit.
+
+But looking back at the categories, 'device' might also be applicable since it's related to device emulation (floppy). But I'm not entirely sure. Alternatively, since the problem seems more about the I/O handling rather than the hardware itself, maybe 'other' is safer.
+
+Wait, the user mentions that hw/block/fdc.c defines the virtual floppy geometry, so this might be an issue in how QEMU emulates the floppy controller, hence a 'peripherals' category makes sense. The error occurs during an I/O operation on the floppy device, which falls under peripherals.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an assertion failure in QEMU's I/O handling for block devices, specifically related to floppy disk emulation. Since this pertains to device emulation within the peripherals subsystem, the appropriate category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1880066 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1880066
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..73adc4d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1880066
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem and figure out which category it fits best.
+
+The user describes an issue where the microphone input dies in a guest when switching evdev input. They mention that this didn't happen with a previous version (Eoan, using Qemu 4.0.0) but started after upgrading to Focal with Qemu 4.2. They downgraded and it resolved the issue.
+
+Looking at the log provided, there are repeated errors in audio functions: audio_get_avail and audio_pcm_hw_get_live_in. The logs mention "A bug was just triggered," which suggests a problem within the audio handling code of QEMU.
+
+Now, considering the categories:
+
+- **mistranslation**: Doesn't seem related as it's about assembly or semantic mapping.
+- **assembly**: Again, not directly related to assembly lowering.
+- **other**: Possible, but I need to check if another category fits better.
+- **device**: Could be relevant if it's a hardware device issue.
+- **graphic**: Unlikely since it's audio-related.
+- **socket**, **network**: Not applicable here.
+- **KVM**: It's about KVM guests, but the problem is specifically with audio.
+- **boot**: Doesn't seem related to booting issues.
+- **vnc**: Maybe if remote desktop is involved, but the issue is with microphone input during evdev switch.
+- **debug**, **files**, **permissions**, **performance**, **kernel**, **peripherals**: The audio issue might fall under peripherals since it's a hardware device interaction.
+
+The errors point to an audio-related problem. Looking at QEMU's architecture, audio handling is part of the device emulation and input/output peripherals. Therefore, categorizing this under 'peripherals' makes sense because it involves the microphone as a peripheral device not functioning correctly after switching evdev input.
+
+So, I think the best fit here is 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1883739 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1883739
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..de430aff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1883739
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. The error message is "ide_dma_cb: Assertion `prep_size >= 0 && prep_size <= n * 512' failed." Let me start by understanding what's happening here.
+
+The assertion failure involves `prep_size` and relates to an IDE DMA callback. IDE stands for Integrated Drive Electronics, which refers to hard disk controllers. DMA (Direct Memory Access) allows the device to transfer data directly to memory without involving the CPU, which can improve performance.
+
+Looking at the error message, it seems that `prep_size` is being checked against a range from 0 to n*512. If this condition isn't met, the assertion fails. This could indicate an issue with how data is being prepared or transferred in the IDE DMA handling.
+
+Now, considering the provided categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. I need to determine which category this bug falls into.
+
+The error is related to IDE (a type of storage controller) and DMA operations. IDE controllers are part of the system's peripherals. Therefore, the bug seems to be in the handling of a peripheral device, specifically the IDE subsystem, during DMA transfers. 
+
+So, the category should be 'peripherals' because it involves hardware devices attached to the computer that QEMU emulates.
+</think>
+
+The assertion failure is related to the IDE (Integrated Drive Electronics) controller and DMA operations. Since IDE controllers are part of the peripherals in a virtual machine setup, the bug falls under the peripherals category.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1884017 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1884017
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..54d07162
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1884017
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories related to QEMU. Let me read through the report carefully.
+
+The user describes an issue where the mouse is behaving erratically under Windows 95 when using QEMU. Specifically, every 20-30 seconds, moving the mouse causes the pointer to move quickly around the screen and randomly click buttons, making the system unusable. They're not sure if it's related to another bug (1785485) but note that the problem occurs even without using the scroll wheel.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals. 
+
+Hmm. The issue is about mouse behavior in a virtualized environment. Since it's related to input devices (mouse), which are typically handled as peripherals in QEMU. So 'peripherals' seems like the most fitting category.
+
+I don't think it's 'graphic' because that would relate more to visual rendering issues, not input device actions. It also doesn't seem like a network or socket issue, nor does it involve booting, VNC, or other listed categories.
+
+So I'll go with 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes erratic mouse behavior in QEMU under Windows 95, which is related to the handling of input devices. The category that best fits this issue is peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1891829 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1891829
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2e6f4dce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1891829
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see what the user is asking here. They have a bug report related to QEMU and want it classified into one of several categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, the issue is about high bits being set incorrectly in received serial bytes when the character size is less than 8 bits. The user mentions that PC serial ports should set non-data bits to 0 when reading characters but QEMU doesn't do this. They also mention using a real serial mouse through a passed-through port and had to add a hack to clear bit 7, which fixed Windows 1.01's issue with the mouse.
+
+Hmm, the problem seems related to how the serial port is emulated in QEMU. Since it's about handling data bits correctly in the serial device, it likely falls under the 'peripherals' category. The other options don't fit as well because it's not a translation error, assembly issue, or something like network or graphics.
+
+So, I think the correct category is 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report deals with incorrect handling of non-data bits in received serial bytes, which affects peripheral devices (specifically the serial mouse). This relates to the emulation of hardware peripherals. 
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1892604 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1892604
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ed47c52b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1892604
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user provided an error message when running QEMU with the Raspi2 platform. The error is an assertion failure in dwc2_glbreg_read: addr <= GINTSTS2.
+
+First, I'll look at where this error occurs. It's in hw/usb/hcd-dwc2.c, which suggests it's related to USB handling since DWC2 is a USB controller. The function dwc2_glbreg_read is reading from the global registers of the USB controller.
+
+The user mentioned that when they run QEMU with a specific Raspi2 setup, after booting, the system crashes with this assertion failure. They also tried modifying the asserts but ended up with a non-responsive system, so just returning 0 or skipping the write didn't fix it properly.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other.
+
+The error is in a USB-related file, so I'm thinking it's related to a peripheral device. The DWC2 controller is part of the USB hardware emulation, which falls under peripherals. It's not about translation or assembly lowering because those are more about instruction conversion and code generation. Device might be too broad since there are many devices, but in this case, it's specifically a USB component.
+
+So I think the correct category here is 'peripherals' because it's dealing with USB hardware emulation.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an assertion failure in a USB controller (DWC2) driver during read operations. This relates to the handling of USB peripherals in QEMU.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1895363 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1895363
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..eff5084e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1895363
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem described is with Borland IDEs where cursor key presses are doubled. The user explains that these DOS-era programs read the PS2 input register multiple times per byte, expecting each byte to stay for a few hundred microseconds before the next comes in. However, QEMU immediately sends the next byte upon a guest read, which breaks this expectation.
+
+So, looking at the categories:
+
+- It's not a mistranslation or assembly issue because it's about how input is handled.
+- Not graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, hypervisor either. Those don't seem relevant here.
+- The issue is related to the PS2 port and how QEMU handles device input timing. It affects peripherals because it's about keyboard input which is a peripheral device.
+
+Therefore, 'peripherals' seems like the most fitting category since it deals with hardware devices and their interaction with the guest OS in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1895602 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1895602
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e54c8df2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1895602
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. The issue is about older OS's not detecting CD changes correctly.
+
+The problem occurs with FreeBSD 2.2 and FreeDOS 1.2 when using the change command on an IDE CD drive. After changing the CD, the guest OS either refuses to read it or reads bad data. However, after a system_reset, they read the disc fine. This suggests that the issue isn't hardware-related but rather how QEMU handles CD changes.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: It's not a mistranslation because that involves user-mode assembly or IR mapping. Assembly lowering is also unlikely. Other possibilities include device, graphic, socket, etc., but the main issue here is with CD drive handling, which relates to peripherals.
+
+The problem seems specific to how QEMU emulates IDE drives and handles CD changes, which falls under the 'peripherals' category since it's about hardware emulation devices.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1899539 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1899539
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..45e5de78
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1899539
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is about keyboard errors in DOS under QEMU. Specifically, cursor keys and some letter keys are repeating, especially when typing quickly. The numpad arrows work fine, but the insert key doesn't function. The user referenced similar bugs related to "drunken keyboard" in go32v2 programs and a VirtualBox ticket that mentions a QEMU patch.
+
+Looking at the categories, this issue is about input device behavior—specifically how the keyboard is handled in the virtual machine. Since it's related to keyboard keys not working correctly, it falls under the peripherals category because it involves hardware devices (keyboard) interacting with the VM.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1900155 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1900155
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cfd95b39
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1900155
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU where the MIPS Malta machine fails to boot due to an IDE error. The user wants me to classify it into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I'll read through the bug report carefully. It mentions that after a specific commit (55adb3c45620c31f29978f209e2a44a08d34e2da), running the test case for MIPS Malta causes it to fail booting. The output shows various errors related to the IDE subsystem, such as the drive reporting a diagnostics failure and multiple SIGSEGV signals being sent due to invalid write accesses.
+
+The commit message by John Snow describes changes made to the IDE implementation. It mentions that the SRST (soft reset) wasn't handled correctly before, leading to potential state machine chaos when certain operations were performed. The fix was to perform a real reset instead of a weak one.
+
+So, looking at the categories:
+
+- Mistranslation and assembly are related to code translation or lowering, which doesn't seem relevant here.
+- Graphic and network don't fit since the issue is with IDE devices.
+- Socket isn't mentioned either.
+- The problem seems hardware-related. Since it's about the IDE subsystem in QEMU, which emulates peripherals like hard drives and CD-ROMs, "peripherals" would be the appropriate category.
+
+The commit modifies how resets are handled for IDE devices, so this is definitely a hardware emulation issue rather than something related to the hypervisor (which would involve KVM) or other areas.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue with the IDE subsystem in QEMU's hardware emulation. 
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1900352 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1900352
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ef03f06a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1900352
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned that there's no sound in the SPICE client when VNC is enabled. They're using Fedora32 with virt-manager, libvirt, and QEMU. 
+
+So, the problem occurs when both SPICE and VNC are configured. Without VNC, sound works fine through SPICE. This makes me think that enabling VNC somehow interferes with SPICE's audio handling.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, network, etc. The issue is related to sound, which falls under peripherals because it's about input/output devices and their functionality. 
+
+I don't think it's a translation or assembly issue since it's more about configuration between two graphical protocols. It's not directly about graphics handling (graphic category) but rather about the audio component.
+
+So, the most appropriate category would be "peripherals" because sound is a peripheral device function that isn't working correctly when VNC is active.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves no sound in the SPICE client when VNC is enabled. The issue relates to the interaction between the SPICE server and the VNC display, affecting audio routing. Since the problem pertains to the functionality of a peripheral device (sound) being impacted by another component (VNC), the appropriate category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1901981 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1901981
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..052d0c31
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1901981
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, or other.
+
+Looking at the bug report, the assertion failure is in hw/usb/dev-storage.c at line 248: usb_msd_send_status. The error message mentions that s->csw.sig should be equal to cpu_to_le32(0x53425355) but it's failing. This suggests an issue with how the USB storage device is handling status information.
+
+The command line used includes various QEMU options, notably -device usb-storage and -drive parameters. The failure occurs in hw/usb, which relates to USB hardware devices. Since the problem is within the USB storage device code, it's likely a peripheral-related bug. USB devices are generally categorized under peripherals in QEMU.
+
+Other possible categories were considered: KVM is about virtualization; boot relates to system startup; vnc is for remote display; debug is about debugging tools; files, permissions, and performance don't seem relevant here. The issue isn't about translation or assembly lowering, nor does it involve sockets or network directly, though there's a NIC in the setup, but the failure is specific to USB storage.
+
+Therefore, the most appropriate category for this bug report is peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1902112 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1902112
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ae3f1b4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1902112
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's figure out how to classify this bug report. The issue is about an index-out-of-bounds error in the xhci_runtime_write function of QEMU. 
+
+First, I'll look at the provided categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is related to the USB XHCI controller in QEMU. The stack trace points to hcd-xhci.c at line 3012. XHCI stands for x86 Host Controller Emulation, which handles USB devices in virtual machines. 
+
+The error message mentions an index out of bounds for 'XHCIInterrupter [16]'. This suggests that there's a problem with array indexing in the XHCI code. Since it's a runtime write issue, it's not related to translation or assembly lowering. It doesn't fall under graphics, network, socket, etc., directly.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'peripherals' seems appropriate because USB devices are peripherals handled by QEMU's device emulation. The problem is in how the XHCI controller is managing its interrupters, which are part of the peripheral emulation layer.
+
+Other categories like kernel or hypervisor don't fit as well since this is a specific issue within device handling rather than the broader system or virtualization layers.
+
+So, the category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an index-out-of-bounds error in the XHCI controller's runtime write function. The XHCI controller manages USB devices in QEMU, which falls under peripheral emulation.
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1904464 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1904464
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c220a38e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1904464
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the bug report carefully.
+
+The bug is about a build failure occurring because of a 64-bit time_t. It mentions that the 'time' element in the input_event structure is deprecated. The error message points to hw/input/virtio-input-host.c, specifically line 198 where it's trying to access evdev.time, which doesn't exist anymore.
+
+So, the issue arises because the code is using a deprecated member of the struct input_event. This deprecation likely happened in the kernel, as indicated by the provided commit link. The build failure suggests that the code is not compatible with newer versions of the kernel where 'time' was removed or changed.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation refers to incorrect mapping from source architecture to target IR, which doesn't seem to fit here since this is a build issue related to deprecated struct members, not an assembly translation problem. Assembly lowering (assembly) isn't directly relevant either.
+
+Other possibilities include 'kernel' since it's dealing with kernel structures, but the main issue is in QEMU's hw/input/virtio-input-host.c, which is part of the input handling for virtual devices. The category 'peripherals' might be more appropriate because virtio-input relates to emulating peripherals in QEMU.
+
+Wait, let me think again. The problem is that QEMU is using a deprecated struct member from the host kernel's input.h. This isn't about translation but rather about compatibility with the kernel's API changes. So it's related to how QEMU interacts with kernel structures, which might fall under 'kernel' or perhaps 'device' since it's hardware-related.
+
+Alternatively, considering that this is part of the Virtio-Input host code, which deals with input devices like mice and keyboards in virtual machines, it's more about peripheral handling. So maybe 'peripherals' is a better fit because it's about how QEMU manages input devices.
+
+But wait, another angle: the build failure is due to a struct member being deprecated. It's an issue with how QEMU uses kernel headers, which might be categorized under 'kernel'. However, since Virtio-Input is part of the hardware emulation for peripherals, perhaps 'peripherals' is more accurate because it directly affects input devices.
+
+I'm still a bit torn between 'kernel' and 'peripherals', but I think the bug report is about the interaction with kernel structures in QEMU's peripheral handling code. Therefore, 'peripherals' seems like the right category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report addresses an issue where QEMU's hw/input/virtio-input-host.c file references a deprecated struct member from the host kernel's input.h. This deprecation causes a build failure due to the missing 'time' member in struct input_event. The fix involves updating the code to handle this change, ensuring compatibility with newer kernels.
+
+The problem lies in how QEMU interacts with kernel structures related to input events, specifically for Virtio-Input devices which emulate peripherals. Therefore, the appropriate category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1906180 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1906180
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b7083792
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1906180
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. The issue is about keyboard keys getting stuck and repeating when certain key combinations are used, like Ctrl+V. Let me think through how to approach this.
+
+First, the symptoms described are that pressing a key causes it to repeat until another key is pressed. This happens in Linux guests using QEMU with KVM. The user mentions it's especially noticeable with key combinations, which makes me think about how the keyboard events are handled by QEMU and the guest OS.
+
+Looking at the list of categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. I need to pick the most appropriate one.
+
+The problem seems related to how input is handled. Since it's about keyboard keys not working correctly—sticking and repeating—it likely involves the input devices in QEMU. The KVM option comes to mind because KVM handles virtualization and interacts with host devices, including input.
+
+Alternatively, 'peripherals' could also be a category since keyboards are peripherals. But considering that KVM is part of the hypervisor layer handling device emulation, maybe it's under 'KVM'. However, sometimes these issues might fall under general device handling rather than specific to KVM.
+
+Wait, but looking at the possible categories again, there's both 'device' and 'peripherals' as separate options. 'Device' seems broader, while 'peripherals' is more specific to input/output devices like keyboards, mice, etc. So perhaps 'peripherals' would be more precise here because it's about the keyboard not functioning correctly.
+
+But another angle: since KVM is involved in virtualizing hardware, including the keyboard, maybe this issue is part of how QEMU/KVM emulates or handles the keyboard device. If that's the case, then 'KVM' might be the category.
+
+Alternatively, sometimes bugs related to input handling are classified under 'device', as they pertain to device emulation in QEMU. So I'm a bit torn between 'peripherals' and 'device'.
+
+Looking at the categories again: the options include 'peripherals' which probably refers to the management of hardware devices within the VM, like USB or PS/2 devices. Since this is about the keyboard, which is a peripheral device, 'peripherals' seems fitting.
+
+Wait, but in the context of QEMU, 'device' could refer more broadly to any device emulation, including storage, network, etc., while 'peripherals' might be a subset under that. However, since the category list includes 'peripherals' as its own option, it's better to classify this there.
+
+But looking back, perhaps the problem is related to how events are processed in the hypervisor layer. KVM intercepts certain events and passes them through to the guest. If the keyboard input isn't being handled correctly by QEMU's KVM component, that could cause such issues. So maybe 'KVM' would be the appropriate category.
+
+Alternatively, sometimes these issues might fall under the broader 'device' category, but since it's specifically about a peripheral (keyboard), I'm leaning towards 'peripherals'.
+
+Wait, let me think again: the bug report mentions that when using KVM, the keyboard keys get stuck. So it's related to how QEMU/KVM handles input events. The problem is happening in the guest OS because of incorrect handling by the hypervisor or QEMU.
+
+In QEMU's structure, device emulation is part of the 'hw' (hardware) components, but in terms of categorization here, since the issue is about a specific peripheral (keyboard), it's likely under 'peripherals'. Alternatively, if it's related to how KVM virtualizes the keyboard input, it might be under 'KVM'.
+
+I think I'll go with 'device' because it's about device emulation and handling within QEMU. But I'm not entirely sure.
+
+Wait no, considering that 'peripherals' is more specific to devices like USB, serial, etc., including the keyboard, which is a peripheral device. So perhaps 'peripherals' is better.
+
+Alternatively, maybe it's under 'input', but that category isn't listed. The closest options are 'device' and 'peripherals'. Given that, I think 'peripherals' would be more precise for this bug.
+</think>
+
+The issue relates to incorrect keyboard behavior in the guest OS when using QEMU with KVM. Since the problem is about a peripheral device (keyboard) not functioning correctly, the appropriate category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1906608 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1906608
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8ede977a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1906608
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user mentioned a feature request regarding the EHCI controller in QEMU. They pointed out that for some controllers, like the FSL_IMX6, portsc[26-27] is used to determine device speed—whether full speed or high speed. The current code in hub-ehci.c doesn't seem to handle this correctly. Specifically, at line 1001, it checks if the device's speedmask includes USB_SPEED_MASK_HIGH and then sets a bit (PORTSC_PED). 
+
+The user provided the specification for FSL_IMX6, where portsc[27:26] is the PSPD field. This field has specific values indicating port speed. The current code isn't setting this correctly based on the device's actual speed.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation relates to incorrect mapping between source and target architectures, which doesn't seem right here since it's about USB controller behavior in QEMU. Assembly lowering is more about how assembly is converted into IR, not relevant here. Other is a catch-all, but let's see if any other category fits.
+
+The issue pertains to the EHCI controller handling device speeds, which falls under hardware or peripheral devices. The problem is that the controller isn't correctly setting the port speed information, affecting how USB devices are detected and handled. This seems related to kernel-level interactions, specifically with peripherals connected via USB.
+
+While 'device' could be a possibility, 'kernel' might be more precise since it's about the system's handling of hardware devices through the kernel. However, considering that the issue is within QEMU's EHCI controller code, which interacts with USB peripherals, 'peripherals' seems fitting as well.
+
+But looking back at the possible categories: 'hypervisor' isn't relevant here; 'network' could be considered if it were a network device, but this is about USB. 'kernel' relates to the operating system's handling of devices, and 'peripherals' specifically refers to hardware devices connected to the system.
+
+Since the bug report focuses on how QEMU (which acts as a hypervisor for KVM) emulates a specific controller's behavior regarding device speeds, which is crucial for USB peripherals to function correctly. Therefore, it touches upon both the kernel's handling of devices and the peripheral devices themselves.
+
+But given the categories provided, 'kernel' might be too broad, while 'peripherals' is more specific to the hardware devices connected via the EHCI controller. Alternatively, since this involves a feature request to improve device emulation, perhaps 'other' isn't the best fit if none of the other categories directly apply.
+
+Wait, looking again at the categories: 'device' could be applicable as it's about the USB device handling. But 'peripherals' is more precise because it's about the devices connected via the EHCI controller in QEMU, which emulates hardware peripherals for a VM.
+
+I think the best fit here is 'other', but I'm not entirely sure. Alternatively, perhaps 'kernel' if the issue pertains to how the kernel interacts with the device, or 'peripherals' as it's about the devices themselves.
+
+But since the bug report is specifically about modifying QEMU's hub-ehci.c to correctly set portsc[26-27], which affects how USB devices are detected, I'd say this falls under the broader category of 'other'. However, considering that it's related to hardware device emulation within QEMU, perhaps 'peripherals' is more accurate.
+
+Wait, reviewing the list: 'device' and 'peripherals' are separate categories. Since EHCI controllers are part of the USB peripheral devices, I think 'peripherals' is the correct category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses modifying the EHCI controller in QEMU to correctly handle device speed detection via portsc[26-27]. This pertains to the handling of USB peripherals.
+
+**Category: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1909247 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1909247
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5317bd3c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1909247
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's read through the information carefully.
+
+The bug is about a use-after-free vulnerability in the esp_do_dma() function within hw/scsi/esp.c. The specific component mentioned is the am53c974 SCSI host bus adapter emulation. A privileged guest could exploit this to crash QEMU, leading to DoS or potential code execution.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is in the SCSI emulation part of QEMU. The am53c974 is a SCSI host bus adapter, which falls under peripheral devices. The use-after-free is related to handling the 'Information Transfer' command (CMD_TI), indicating it's part of how the device handles data transfers.
+
+Since the bug involves a device driver emulator in QEMU and relates to hardware device emulation specifically for SCSI adapters, the most appropriate category is "peripherals."
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses an issue within the SCSI host bus adapter emulation in QEMU, which falls under peripheral devices. The vulnerability occurs during handling of the 'Information Transfer' command by the am53c974 emulator.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1911216 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1911216
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c57ac5b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1911216
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let's see what information we have here.
+
+The bug report mentions an assertion failure in hw/usb/hcd-ohci.c:1297, specifically at the function ohci_frame_boundary. The user provided a backtrace which shows that the program aborted due to this issue. 
+
+Looking at the categories, I need to figure out what part of QEMU is affected here. The file hcd-ohci.c suggests it's related to the USB OHCI (Open Host Controller Interface) implementation in QEMU. OHCI is a type of USB controller used in emulators.
+
+The function ohci_frame_boundary probably deals with timing or scheduling of USB transactions, maybe how frames are handled in the USB protocol. The backtrace shows that this function was called by timerlist_run_timers, which suggests it's part of QEMU's timer handling mechanism. 
+
+Wait, but what category does this fall under? Let me look at the list again: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Since this is related to USB devices, which are handled as peripherals in QEMU. The OHCI controller emulates a USB host controller, so any issues here would likely be under 'peripherals'.
+
+Alternatively, maybe it's part of the device emulation, but I think 'peripherals' is more specific because USB controllers are considered peripheral devices in this context.
+
+So, the category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an assertion failure in a function related to USB OHCI handling, which falls under peripherals emulation. 
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1913341 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1913341
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9c7c3da6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1913341
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let's read through the report carefully.
+
+The user describes an issue with chardev behavior in QEMU affecting polling-based devices. They explain that when a chardev source processes data, it checks buffer space and sets up child sources based on availability. However, in cases where the guest doesn't clear buffers quickly enough, the IO loop might block indefinitely because there's no active poll or timeout set.
+
+The bug primarily affects character device emulation, specifically how polling is handled for devices with limited buffer sizes. The user suggests possible fixes like removing certain logic or setting a timeout, and mentions that this issue occurs in chardev/char-io.c.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The problem relates to character devices and their interaction with I/O polling mechanisms. Since chardevs are part of the input/output handling for emulated hardware, this falls under 'peripherals'. The issue is about device behavior during IO operations, so it's not a translation or performance issue. It's more specific to how peripherals (like serial ports) handle data and polling.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses issues with character device emulation and I/O polling in QEMU, specifically affecting peripherals like serial ports. Therefore, the appropriate category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1913668 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1913668
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..883e5f98
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1913668
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a bug report with an FPE (Floating Point Exception) occurring in the function npcm7xx_pwm_calculate_freq at line 94 of hw/misc/npcm7xx_pwm.c. 
+
+First, I need to understand what the error is about. An FPE typically indicates some kind of arithmetic operation that's invalid, like division by zero or taking the square root of a negative number. Looking at the trace, it says there's a division by zero happening in npcm7xx_pwm_calculate_freq. That suggests the function is trying to divide by a value that's zero, which isn't allowed mathematically and causes the program to crash.
+
+Now, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. 
+
+The function name npcm7xx_pwm suggests it's related to PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) controllers on the NPCM750 SoC. Since this is hardware-related, specifically dealing with a peripheral component like the PWM controller, the error likely stems from incorrect handling of hardware registers or calculations in the device model.
+
+The FPE occurs during runtime when trying to calculate the frequency for the PWM. This doesn't seem to be related to translation issues between architectures (mistranslation) or assembly code lowering (assembly). It's more about how the QEMU emulator interacts with the simulated hardware, specifically thePWM controller.
+
+Looking at the call stack, it starts in npcm7xx_pwm.c and moves up through various memory and main loop functions. This indicates that the issue is within the device's implementation in QEMU rather than other areas like networking or graphics.
+
+So, considering all this, the bug is related to a hardware peripheral (PWM) not being handled correctly in the emulator, leading to an arithmetic error during calculation. Therefore, the appropriate category for this bug would be "peripherals."
+</think>
+
+The FPE occurs in a function related to PWM controller hardware emulation, indicating an issue with handling a specific device's peripherals.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1913669 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1913669
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b3fd42f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1913669
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user provided a trace where there's an FPE (Floating Point Exception) in the function npcm7xx_adc_convert at line 60. 
+
+Looking at the error message, it mentions a division by zero, which is undefined behavior. The stack trace shows that this occurs during the ADC conversion process, specifically in the hw/adc/npcm7xx_adc.c file.
+
+The possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+This bug is related to hardware emulation since it's in the ADC (Analog-to-Digital Converter) part of QEMU. The error happens when handling ADC conversion, which is a peripheral device function. So, the category should be 'peripherals' because it's about simulating or emulating hardware devices.
+</think>
+
+The bug occurs in the ADC (analog-to-digital converter) emulation code, which falls under hardware peripherals.
+
+**Step-by-Step Explanation:**
+
+1. **Identify the Error Context:** The FPE happens in `npcm7xx_adc_convert` due to a division by zero.
+
+2. **Determine the Affected Component:** This function is part of QEMU's ADC hardware emulation for the npcm750-evb board.
+
+3. **Map to Possible Categories:** Since it's related to device simulation, specifically a peripheral component (ADC), the category is 'peripherals'.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1914353 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1914353
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..816eee81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1914353
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let's see what the issue is.
+
+The problem is with the AArch64 GIC component in QEMU. The bug involves an out-of-bounds access via interrupt ID. Specifically, the SGIINTID field was treated as 10 bits when it should be only 4 bits according to the ARM spec. This caused a heap-buffer-overflow because the code was using a wrong mask, leading to accessing an incorrect part of the array.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is in the GIC code, which handles interrupts for ARM systems. Since this relates to how hardware components (like interrupt controllers) are emulated, it falls under the 'peripherals' category. The issue isn't about user-mode translations, assembly lowering, or network-related functions. It's a hardware emulation problem, specifically with peripherals.
+
+So, the correct classification is 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an out-of-bounds access in QEMU's GIC (Generic Interrupt Controller) component for AArch64 architectures. The issue arises due to incorrect handling of the interrupt ID, which should be 4 bits but was treated as 10 bits. This led to a heap buffer overflow and is classified under security vulnerabilities.
+
+The GIC is part of the hardware emulation in QEMU, specifically related to peripherals. Therefore, the correct category for this bug report is **peripherals**.
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1917442 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1917442
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a03c9b8e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1917442
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let's go through the information step by step.
+
+The user provided a bug report where running a GNU/Hurd guest in QEMU causes an AHCI crash. The error message mentions "root@zamhurd:~# .ahcisata0 channel 5: setting WDCTL_RST failed for drive 0" and then a segmentation fault in the `ahci_commit_buf` function at line 1462 of `ahci.c`. 
+
+Looking at the backtrace, it seems like the crash happens when trying to commit a buffer. The function `ahci_commit_buf` is called with `dma=0x555557335870`, and `tx_bytes=2048`. Then, inside this function, it accesses `ad->cur_cmd->status`, but `ad->cur_cmd` is null because when they checked `gdb`, `ad->cur_cmd` was 0x0. This means that the code is trying to dereference a null pointer, leading to a segmentation fault.
+
+The error occurs in the AHCI (Advanced Host Controller Interface) emulation part of QEMU, which handles IDE devices like hard drives. The function `ahci_commit_buf` is part of the hardware emulation layer, specifically for handling DMA operations on IDE devices.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Since this is related to hardware emulation, particularly AHCI and DMA operations for storage devices, it's likely a device-related issue. The problem arises during the handling of I/O operations for IDE drives, which falls under the 'peripherals' category because AHCI controllers are part of the peripheral devices emulated by QEMU.
+
+So, considering all this, the appropriate classification is 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a crash in the AHCI emulation code when handling an IDE drive. The error occurs during DMA operations, specifically when trying to commit a buffer and accessing a null pointer (`ad->cur_cmd` being `0x0`). Since this relates to hardware emulation for storage devices, it's categorized under peripherals.
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1918321 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1918321
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3465d97b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1918321
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The issue is titled "megasas: Null-ptr dereference in megasas_finish_dcmd." So it's related to the megasas driver and a null pointer dereference. The stack trace points to line 1884 in megasas.c, where there's an attempt to access a struct mfi_frame_header through a null pointer.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+This bug is about a null pointer dereference in the megasas driver. The megasas is part of the SCSI subsystem, which handles storage devices. So it's related to device drivers for hardware (peripherals). 
+
+The crash occurs when accessing memory with a null pointer, which suggests an issue in how the code handles device commands or DMA operations. Since it's within the SCSI and block layers, it's definitely a hardware peripheral issue.
+
+Therefore, the most appropriate category is peripherals.
+</think>
+
+The bug is classified under **peripherals** because it involves a null pointer dereference in the megasas driver, which is part of the SCSI subsystem handling storage devices (a hardware peripheral). 
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1926174 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1926174
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e28ca11e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1926174
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's read through the problem carefully.
+
+The user is experiencing issues with mouse input in a CloudReady (Chrome OS) VM running on QEMU 5.2. They mention two main problems: when using SDL display, the mouse is flickering and displaced, making it hard to hit buttons. When switching to fullscreen, this displacement issue persists for a while but improves in terms of cursor visibility. However, with SPICE, the mouse is very laggy, appearing every few seconds, which makes it unusable, though its placement seems correct.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. I need to figure out which category best fits this issue.
+
+The problem revolves around mouse input, specifically cursor display and movement issues. Since the mouse is a hardware peripheral being emulated in the VM, it falls under the category related to peripherals. The symptoms point towards issues with how QEMU handles the mouse device, either through SDL or SPICE. So, "peripherals" seems like the most appropriate classification.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes issues with mouse input lag and displacement when using CloudReady VM on QEMU. Since the problem is related to the cursor behavior in different display modes (SDL and SPICE), it's likely connected to how QEMU handles input devices, specifically the mouse as a peripheral.
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/195 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/195
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..740d87f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/195
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "wavcapture does not record silence". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, what is wavcapture? From what I remember, QEMU has various audio drivers and devices. Wavcapture might be a component related to capturing audio input, possibly for recording sound in virtual machines or emulated environments.
+
+The issue here is that it's not recording silence. So when there's no sound being played or sent, the capture isn't working as expected. This likely relates to how the audio device is handling input. 
+
+Looking at the categories: peripherals seems relevant because wavcapture would be interacting with audio hardware devices, which are peripherals in a system context. If it's not capturing silence, maybe there's an issue with how the audio device or its driver is being emulated or handled by QEMU.
+
+Other possibilities like network or socket don't seem to fit here since this is about audio recording. Graphic and display issues aren't related either. Mistranslation and assembly lowering are more about code generation and compilation, which doesn't directly relate to the audio capture functionality.
+
+So, peripherals seems to be the most appropriate category because it's dealing with hardware device interaction, specifically an audio-related one.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1960 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1960
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f6483500
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1960
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The issue is about an invalid PMU interrupt ID in an ARM virtual machine's device tree. The commit mentioned, 9036e917f8357f4e5965ebfecdab5964d40e6a40, changes the definition of PPI interrupt IDs but forgets to update the PMU device tree accordingly.
+
+Looking at the provided patch, it modifies hw/arm/virt.c. The change is in how the "interrupts" property is set for the PMU node in the device tree. Previously, it used VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ directly, but now it's using INTID_TO_PPI(VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ). So the bug is related to incorrect handling of interrupt IDs in the device tree.
+
+The categories I have are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Since this issue involves the device tree and PMU (which is a peripheral), it's related to how devices are defined and configured. The problem isn't about translation or assembly lowering; it's more about incorrect configuration data in the device tree affecting hardware peripherals.
+
+Therefore, the most appropriate category here would be "peripherals" because the bug is within the handling of PMU as a peripheral device.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1979 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1979
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8470f1b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1979
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that the pc-q35-7.2 version breaks the PCIe hot plugin feature. They noticed that with versions 5.2, 6.0, it works fine, but starting from 6.1 and onwards, including 7.2, the functionality fails.
+
+Looking at the dmesg logs, in the working cases (versions <=6.0), there's a pciehp entry which indicates that the PCIe hot plug is active. But with newer versions, this pciehp doesn't show up, meaning the hot plug feature isn't being recognized or initialized properly.
+
+The steps to reproduce involve running QEMU and checking dmesg for pcieport entries. The user also notes that without pciehp, device initialization fails when trying to plug in a GPU or similar device.
+
+Now, considering the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is related to PCIe hot plugging, which involves hardware devices and their interaction with the system. In QEMU, this would be part of the device emulation or handling of Peripheral devices. So the category 'peripherals' seems appropriate because it's about the management of hardware devices attached to the virtual machine.
+</think>
+
+The bug is related to PCIe hot plug functionality failing in newer QEMU versions. Since PCIe hot plugging involves managing peripheral devices, the correct category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1980 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1980
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7e70245e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/1980
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU. The issue is related to pipewire backend causing bad microphone sound. Let me think through the possible categories given.
+
+First, the problem involves audio issues when using the mic with Skype in a QEMU VM on openSUSE that's using Pipewire as its backend. Without Pipewire and instead using the PA (PulseAudio) backend, there are no problems. So it's specifically about how QEMU interacts with the pipewire backend regarding audio.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others like mistranslation or assembly lowering.
+
+The issue seems to be related to how QEMU handles the audio (mic) when using Pipewire. Since it's a VM sharing resources with the host, including the webcam and mic, this falls under device-related issues because it's about hardware devices being passed through or handled in the virtual environment.
+
+I don't think it's graphic because it's not related to display output. Network is also unrelated here. KVM would be if it were a kernel-based issue with virtualization, but this seems more about device handling within QEMU.
+
+Peripherals makes sense because the mic is a hardware peripheral that's being accessed by the VM. So maybe 'peripherals' is the right category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report relates to audio issues when using a microphone in a QEMU VM with Pipewire backend. Since it involves hardware devices like the microphone, which are peripherals in the virtual environment.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2021 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2021
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6859f20d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2021
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report: "crashing when trying to read data from sensor through USB." The categories provided are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, the issue is about reading data from a sensor via USB. Since it's related to USB devices and sensors connected through them, I should consider which category fits best.
+
+Looking at the options, "peripherals" seems appropriate because USB devices are considered peripherals in computing. The bug involves hardware interaction, specifically with a sensor connected over USB, so it's not about translation errors or performance issues but rather device handling.
+
+I don't think it falls under 'device' as that might be too broad, and 'peripherals' is more specific to external hardware like sensors and USB devices. Other categories like graphic or network aren't relevant here.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/204 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/204
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f62bcc27
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/204
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU. The user mentioned that "Dos Keypad is not working for numbers - numlock is not working." Hmm, okay, let's break this down.
+
+First, I know that QEMU is a hypervisor used for running virtual machines. It emulates various hardware components so that the guest operating system can function as if it were running on real hardware.
+
+The issue here is with the keypad not working correctly. Specifically, numbers aren't functioning and the numlock isn't working either. So this seems related to input devices in the VM.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+I'm thinking that since it's about the keypad and numlock, which are part of the keyboard hardware, this falls under input devices. Peripherals usually refer to external devices connected to a computer, including keyboards, mice, etc. So in a virtual machine context, emulating a keyboard would be handled by the hypervisor or through specific device emulation.
+
+Wait, but QEMU does have things like '-usb' and '-keyboard' options for adding peripherals. So if the keypad isn't working, it's likely an issue with how QEMU is emulating that hardware component, which would fall under 'peripherals'.
+
+Another thought: could this be related to the KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) hypervisor instead of QEMU itself? Because sometimes QEMU works with KVM for better performance. But since the user mentioned it's part of QEMU, I think the issue is within QEMU's device emulation.
+
+So putting it all together, the bug is about a hardware peripheral not working correctly in the VM, so the category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/205 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/205
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1d956d80
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/205
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "Arrow keys press is double in some programs in Dos." The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about arrow keys being pressed twice in some DOS programs. This sounds like an input problem, specifically with keyboard handling. Since it's related to hardware interaction and how the system processes key presses, I think it falls under "peripherals." Peripherals often involve devices like keyboards and their drivers. It might not be a translation issue or performance-related; more likely, there's an issue in how the hypervisor (like QEMU) handles keyboard input for DOS programs.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2055 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2055
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0a5fd279
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2055
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. I have to classify a bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. The categories are: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The bug report says they can't set the PBMTE bit in the menvcfg register for RISC-V 64-bit. The user tried using write_csr(menvcfg,PTE_PBMT). So, I'm thinking about what each category means.
+
+Mistranslation is about incorrect mapping from source to target, usually in user-mode. Assembly lowering might be related to converting high-level code to assembly. Since this issue is with a specific register bit not being set, it's probably hardware-related.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'peripherals' seems relevant because registers like menvcfg are part of the hardware peripherals that QEMU emulates. Setting bits in such registers often involves handling I/O devices or hardware-specific configurations, which falls under peripherals.
+
+So, the category is likely 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions an issue with setting a specific bit in a hardware register (menvcfg) for RISC-V 64-bit. This relates to how QEMU emulates hardware peripherals, so the appropriate category is:
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2073 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2073
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d6ff3e1f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2073
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report from QEMU. The user mentioned an issue with the microphone input not being able to be disabled in the guest VM. They tried using -audio dsound and noticed that it unconditionally acquires CLSID_DirectSoundCapture, which might cause issues on hosts without a microphone or when the user doesn't want the VM to access it.
+
+First, I need to look at the possible categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is about audio input in QEMU. They're talking about the audio backend and whether it's capturing microphone input by default without a way to disable it. This seems related to hardware devices, specifically audio or microphone devices, which are usually handled as peripherals in virtual machines.
+
+Looking deeper, the user points out that even if they set in.channels=0, it doesn't work, meaning the VM still tries to access the microphone. The issue arises because the backend is always trying to create an input device unless certain conditions are met. So, this is about how QEMU interacts with host audio devices and whether it can be controlled.
+
+The category 'peripherals' makes sense here because it's related to hardware devices (like microphones) being accessed by the VM. It's not a translation issue or something related to graphics or networking directly, but rather about input devices that are part of the peripherals in the virtual environment.
+
+I don't think it's under 'network' because there's no mention of network-related functions. Similarly, 'graphic' doesn't apply here as it's not about display issues. It could be considered under 'device', but 'peripherals' is more specific since we're talking about input devices like microphones.
+
+So, the best fit for this bug report would be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The issue pertains to audio input devices and their configuration in QEMU. Since it's related to hardware peripherals (microphone) access control within the VM, the appropriate category is:
+
+**peripherals**
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2087 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2087
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b68692be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2087
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm looking at this bug report to figure out which category it falls into. The user mentioned issues with passing a JMicron USB SATA IDE bridge storage device to a Windows guest VM using QEMU. They noted that the VM and device become unusable, taking several minutes to identify the device.
+
+The key points are:
+
+1. The problem occurs when using usb-host/libusb for the device.
+2. It works fine in Fedora as the host but not in Windows.
+3. Trying different XHCI controllers (nec-usb-xhci, ICH9) didn't change the behavior in Windows.
+4. A USB 3.x storage stick works okay under Windows.
+
+Since the issue is related to how QEMU's usb-host or libusb handles a specific device, and it's causing problems with device attachment and VM usability, this seems like an issue with how the device is being handled at the USB level. The mention of XHCI controller behavior in Windows suggests it might be related to how the hypervisor (QEMU) interacts with the host's USB devices.
+
+Considering the categories, 'usb-host' or 'libusb' falls under the 'peripherals' category because it deals with device handling and hardware passthrough. Alternatively, since it's about device attachment issues, 'device' might be another fit. However, given that the primary issue is with how the USB device is being handled in QEMU, I think 'peripherals' is more appropriate.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves issues with USB device handling under QEMU, specifically with a JMicron storage bridge when used with a Windows guest VM. The problem appears to stem from how usb-host or libusb manages the device, leading to slow attachment and VM unavailability. This suggests it's related to device handling and hardware passthrough, which falls under the 'peripherals' category.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/213 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/213
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ac052a54
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/213
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this classification task step by step. The bug report says that "memory writes via gdb don't work for memory mapped hardware." I need to categorize this into one of the given options: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, let's understand what the bug is about. It mentions that memory writes via GDB (the GNU Debugger) aren't functioning correctly when dealing with memory-mapped hardware. Memory-mapped hardware refers to devices where specific regions of memory are mapped into the CPU's address space, allowing direct memory access for device I/O.
+
+Now, looking at the categories: 
+
+- **mistranslation**: This relates to incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target in user-mode assembly. The issue here isn't about translation but rather about how GDB interacts with hardware memory.
+  
+- **assembly**: Assembly lowering issues might involve converting high-level code to assembly incorrectly, which doesn't seem relevant here.
+
+- **other**: A catch-all category, but we should check if another category fits first.
+
+Looking at the other options:
+
+- **device**: This could be related, as it involves hardware devices. However, memory-mapped hardware is more about how memory interacts with peripherals.
+
+- **peripherals**: This seems closer because it's about hardware devices connected to the system and their interaction with memory.
+
+The issue isn't with GDB itself but how GDB writes to memory that's mapped for hardware devices. Therefore, the problem lies in the interaction between software (GDB) and hardware peripherals through memory mapping.
+
+So, considering all this, the most appropriate category is **peripherals**.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2132 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2132
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ea1809d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2132
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report where someone is having trouble with USB devices not being recognized in a Windows VM when using QEMU. Let me break down what's happening here.
+
+The user mapped some USB hubs to their Windows VM. They followed steps like adding the hub as a USB Host Device and checking that Windows recognizes the hub itself. But when they plug a device into one of the connected ports, Windows throws an error saying the device isn't recognized. That suggests there's an issue with how the devices are being passed through or managed by QEMU.
+
+Looking at the possible categories, I need to figure out which one fits this scenario best. The categories include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Since the issue is about USB devices not being recognized correctly within a VM, it's likely related to how QEMU handles USB devices. The problem isn't with translating code incorrectly (mistranslation) or assembly issues. It also doesn't seem like a graphics, network, or KVM-related bug since the focus is on USB peripherals.
+
+The term "peripherals" in the categories probably refers to hardware devices connected via USB or other ports. Given that the issue revolves around USB hubs and devices not being recognized, this seems directly related to how QEMU manages peripheral devices within the VM environment.
+
+So, putting it all together, the bug report points towards a problem with handling USB peripherals. Therefore, the category should be "peripherals."
+</think>
+
+The issue described pertains to the malfunction of USB devices connected through a hub in a Windows VM using QEMU. The problem occurs when attempting to connect a device to a mapped USB port, resulting in an error message indicating the device isn't recognized. This suggests that there's an issue with how QEMU is handling the USB peripherals within the virtual machine environment.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2139 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2139
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d47d5fc3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2139
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user mentioned that when using SerenityOS on Windows with SDL, the Super key releases immediately, making the shortcuts unusable. However, with GTK, it works but has other mouse issues.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is about a key not holding down properly in SDL. The Super/Win key is part of the input handling. Since it's specific to the windowing system (SDL vs GTK), and affects the interaction with the GUI, I'm thinking this relates to device handling, specifically input devices like the keyboard. 
+
+Peripherals might include devices connected via USB or other hardware, but here it's about keyboard behavior in a window manager context, which could be more related to the graphics or display subsystem. However, considering that the issue is with how QEMU handles the Super key input, it's likely under "peripherals" since it deals with input device emulation.
+
+Alternatively, if the problem arises from the way SDL processes events, maybe it's a graphical issue, but I think peripherals is a better fit because it's about input handling.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to incorrect behavior of the Super key in the SDL windowing system on Windows when running SerenityOS under QEMU. The key releases immediately, preventing the use of shortcuts. Since this involves input device interaction (keyboard), the appropriate category is "peripherals."
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2158 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2158
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..78c28d55
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2158
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU not releasing the mouse after using the release keybind. 
+
+First, I need to read the problem description carefully. The user mentions that when they try to release the mouse using a keybind in QEMU, it doesn't work as expected. Specifically, if the VM window resizes, QEMU moves the window but doesn't release the mouse. They're using a custom QEMU Manager.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about the mouse not being released after attempting to use a keybind. This sounds related to how QEMU handles input devices, particularly the mouse. When you interact with QEMU's window, it often takes over the mouse (full-screen mode or grab). If releasing doesn't work, there might be an issue in how the mouse is handled.
+
+The problem isn't about translating code incorrectly (mistranslation) or assembly issues. It's also not a crash but rather a functional issue. So, 'other' is too vague here. 
+
+Looking at the other options: 'peripherals' seems relevant because it involves device input handling. The mouse is a peripheral device, and if QEMU isn't releasing it correctly, that points to a problem with how peripherals are managed in the application.
+
+I don't think it's related to graphic drivers or display resizing per se; it's more about the input handling. Network, socket, or KVM aren't directly involved here either. The issue is specifically about mouse interaction, so 'peripherals' fits best.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2160 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2160
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5be42c79
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2160
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The error message is about a missing target in the msys2-32bit CI job: "error: target not found: mingw-w64-i686-libusb".
+
+First, let's break down what each part means. MSYS2 is a software distribution for Windows that provides a Unix-like environment and extensive software packages. The 32-bit CI job likely refers to the Continuous Integration setup using this distribution in a 32-bit environment.
+
+The error message indicates that during the build or installation process, it couldn't find the target package "mingw-w64-i686-libusb". The 'libusb' part suggests this is related to USB device handling, as libusb is a library for accessing USB devices.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: device and peripherals are relevant here because libusb deals with USB devices. Other categories like network or graphic don't seem to fit since the issue isn't about network connections or graphical issues. It's also not a mistranslation or assembly-related problem. The missing package is part of the system libraries, so it doesn't fall under kernel or hypervisor either.
+
+So, considering that libusb is related to device drivers and peripherals, the appropriate category for this bug would be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a missing library related to USB handling in the MSYS2 environment. Since libusb is used for managing USB devices, which falls under hardware peripherals, the correct classification is:
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2167 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2167
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..50e19f06
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2167
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user provided a detailed issue about GPIO controllers not generating interrupts when connected via vhost-user in QEMU.
+
+First, I need to understand what each category means. Looking at the list:
+
+- **mistranslation**: Issues with how source architecture is mapped to target.
+- **assembly**: Problems during assembly lowering.
+- **other**: Any other issues that don't fit specific categories.
+- **device**, **graphic**, **socket**, **network**, **KVM**, **boot**, **vnc**, **debug**, **files**, **permissions**, **performance**, **kernel**, **peripherals**, **hypervisor**.
+
+The problem involves GPIO controllers connected via vhost-user to the PCIe bus. The user mentioned using vhost-device-gpio and a patch related to enabling F-IRQ in virtio-pci. The error occurs when trying to monitor the GPIO pins, resulting in "No such device."
+
+GPIO controllers are typically hardware peripherals emulated by QEMU. Since the issue arises from how these devices are connected and handled via vhost-user protocol, which is part of VirtIO devices in QEMU. The problem seems related to device emulation rather than something like assembly translation or network issues.
+
+The failure occurs when trying to access the device, suggesting it's not being recognized correctly. This points towards a device-related issue within the hypervisor environment provided by QEMU.
+
+Looking at the possible categories, "peripherals" makes sense because GPIO controllers are peripherals. Alternatively, "hypervisor" could be considered since vhost-user is part of VirtIO and hypervisor-level devices.
+
+But more specifically, this seems to be about the device's ability to function correctly within the virtualized environment. The error indicates that the device isn't being properly emulated or connected. Therefore, categorizing it under "peripherals" would capture issues related to hardware devices in the VM.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue with GPIO controllers not generating interrupts when using vhost-user protocol in QEMU. This is related to the emulation of hardware peripherals within a virtualized environment. The problem lies in how these devices are handled, which falls under the category of "peripherals."
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/220 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/220
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fcab991d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/220
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report: "Broken mouse movement inside MS-DOS for at least one program". The possible categories are listed as mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, the bug is about mouse movement issues within an MS-DOS environment when running a program. Since it's related to QEMU, which emulates hardware devices, I should think about what part of QEMU handles mouse input.
+
+The mouse is a hardware peripheral, so any issue with its functionality would fall under the 'peripherals' category. It doesn't seem to be a translation or assembly problem, nor does it relate directly to networking, VNC, or KVM. So 'peripherals' makes sense here.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue with mouse movement within MS-DOS, which is related to hardware emulation. Since the mouse is a peripheral device, the appropriate category is peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2243 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2243
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6da5e6d3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2243
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report mentions that using an ES1370 sound card with Windows 2000 and XP guests causes crashes. The description says the guests have built-in drivers for the ES1370, so it's about how QEMU handles this sound card emulation.
+
+First, I think about what ES1370 is—it's a sound card, specifically a Creative Labs SoundBlaster series. In QEMU, hardware devices like sound cards are emulated as peripherals. So any issue related to device emulation would fall under the 'peripherals' category.
+
+The crash happens in the guests when using this sound card, which suggests it's an issue with how the device is being handled by QEMU. It's not a translation error (mistranslation), nor does it relate directly to assembly code or performance issues. It doesn't seem to involve networking, sockets, VNC, or other listed categories either.
+
+So the most fitting category here is 'peripherals' because it's about emulating a hardware device that's causing problems in the guest OS.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue with the ES1370 sound card emulation in QEMU leading to crashes in Windows guests. Since this relates to hardware device handling, the appropriate category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2293 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2293
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..dcb327ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2293
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user is having trouble with the `pamu2fcfg` command getting stuck in a QEMU guest OS. They mentioned that when they run it under QEMU with U2F Passthrough enabled, it doesn't work and gets stuck forever. However, on the host system, it works fine.
+
+First, I'll look at what's involved here. The user is using the `-usb -device u2f-passthru` option, which suggests they're trying to pass through a USB device (in this case, a YubiKey) to the guest OS. So, the problem seems related to how QEMU handles USB devices, specifically the U2F Passthrough feature.
+
+The call flow provided shows that the issue arises in functions related to handling USB transactions between the host and guest. The functions mentioned are all within QEMU's USB U2F device code (`u2f-passthru.c` and `u2f.c`). The process gets stuck waiting for a key, indicating a possible hang or deadlock in how data is being communicated over the USB passthrough.
+
+Since this involves device-specific functionality (USB) and specifically the handling of the U2F Passthrough device within QEMU, it doesn't fit into categories like 'mistranslation' or 'assembly'. Instead, it's more about how the hypervisor (QEMU in this case) manages peripheral devices. Therefore, the most appropriate category here is 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue with USB device passthrough (U2F) where a command gets stuck in the guest OS. The problem occurs within QEMU's USB U2F Passthrough functionality, which falls under handling peripherals.
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2307 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2307
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..70172163
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2307
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user is having trouble with COM port filenames on Windows not being recognized by QEMU. Specifically, when they try to use something like "\\.\COM19" or "\\.\CNCA8", QEMU throws an error saying it's not a valid char driver.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce, running `qemu-system-arm` with `-gdb \\.\COM19` results in an error. The user mentioned that Windows allows COM ports above 9 to be prefixed with `\\.\`, which is common when using USB serial adapters or virtual COM ports from tools like com0com.
+
+The user also provided a diff of their attempted fix in `char.c`. They added code to check if the filename starts with `\\.\` and then set the backend to "serial" and the path accordingly. However, they found this insufficient.
+
+Now, I need to categorize this bug into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, or other.
+
+The issue is about QEMU not recognizing specific filenames for COM ports on Windows. This relates to how QEMU handles character devices (like serial ports) and their configurations. The bug occurs when specifying a COM port with a `\\.\` prefix, which isn't being processed correctly by QEMU's chardev code.
+
+In the provided patch, the user is modifying the char.c file to handle these cases better. This suggests that the problem lies within how character devices are parsed and handled in QEMU. Specifically, it's about correctly interpreting Windows-style COM port filenames for serial communication.
+
+Looking at the categories, "peripherals" seems appropriate because this involves handling I/O devices like serial ports (COM ports) which are peripherals connected to a system. The issue isn't related to translation between architectures (so not mistranslation), nor is it about performance or network-related bugs. Instead, it's about correctly setting up and recognizing device paths for peripherals.
+
+So, the category that best fits this bug report is "peripherals."
+</think>
+
+The issue relates to QEMU's handling of COM port filenames on Windows, which involves character devices used as peripherals. 
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2312 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2312
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ddc9b0eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2312
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a detailed issue where using the qemu-xhci device with HVF on Darwin-aarch64 causes an assertion failure in hvf_vcpu_exec.
+
+First, I'll look at the categories given: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. The bug is happening when using a specific QEMU device, which points towards hardware-related issues.
+
+The error occurs during the execution of hvf_vcpu_exec with an assertion related to 'isv'. This suggests it's within the Hypervisor Host Kernel Extension (HVF) code, which is part of QEMU's acceleration for macOS. The user also mentions that removing patches doesn't change the behavior, and it works fine without HVF.
+
+Looking at the provided steps, the problem arises when adding the qemu-xhci device. QEMU-xhci is a USB controller emulation, so this is related to peripherals or devices. Since the issue occurs during the execution of the VM with a specific device attached, it's likely not a translation or performance issue but rather how the device interacts with the hypervisor.
+
+The assertion in hvf_vcpu_exec could be due to an unhandled scenario when handling MMIO for the xhci device. This points towards a problem in the hypervisor (HVF) layer when dealing with this particular peripheral device, specifically USB.
+
+So, considering all these factors, the bug is related to the interaction between QEMU's HVF and the qemu-xhci device under macOS. The correct category would be 'peripherals' since it's about handling a specific hardware device in the virtual machine.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an assertion failure when using the `qemu-xhci` device with HVF on Darwin-aarch64, indicating an issue with how the hypervisor interacts with this USB controller. Since it relates to a specific hardware device (peripheral) causing the problem, the appropriate category is:
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2347 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2347
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..28a23e7b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2347
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user is reporting an issue where the "Grab Input" feature isn't working correctly when using the Windows key. Specifically, pressing the Windows key sends the input to the host system instead of being captured by the VM. The user expected all inputs to stay within the VM after enabling Input Grabbing.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce: they open QEMU on Arch/KDE, enable Input Grabbing with Ctrl+Alt+G, and then press the Windows key. The problem is that the input isn't grabbed as intended.
+
+Now, I need to figure out which category this falls under. Let's go through the possible categories:
+
+- **mistranslation**: This would relate to incorrect mapping from source architecture to target, perhaps in user-mode. Doesn't seem relevant here since it's about input handling.
+- **assembly**: Assembly lowering issues. Not directly related to input handling.
+- **device**: Could be hardware-related, but this is more about software behavior.
+- **graphic**: Related to graphics rendering or display issues. Input is separate from that.
+- **socket**: Network socket problems. Unrelated here.
+- **network**: Networking bugs, which isn't the case.
+- **KVM**: KVM is a hypervisor and might be related since QEMU uses it for virtualization. However, this seems more about input redirection rather than hypervisor functions.
+- **boot**: Boot issues, not relevant here.
+- **vnc**: VNC remote desktop; not directly connected to local input handling.
+- **debug**: Debugging tools or logs—not the issue.
+- **files**: File operations—doesn't fit.
+- **permissions**: Access rights might be a stretch, but it's more about functionality.
+- **performance**: Could be related if there's lag, but not the core issue here.
+- **kernel**: Kernel-level issues, perhaps in how events are handled. This seems closer because input handling is low-level.
+- **peripherals**: Input devices like keyboards and mice; this could fit since it's about key presses not being captured correctly.
+- **hypervisor**: Similar to KVM, but again, more about system virtualization than input.
+
+The issue is that when Input Grabbing is enabled, the Windows key isn't being grabbed. This points towards a problem in how QEMU handles input events. Since it's related to keyboard input and not graphics or network, "peripherals" seems like the most appropriate category because it deals with input devices.
+
+Alternatively, if the issue is at the kernel level (how the VM captures events), then "kernel" could be considered, but "peripherals" might be more specific as it's about device input management within QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where enabling Input Grabbing in QEMU causes the Windows key to send input to the host system instead of being captured by the VM. This is related to how input events are handled, specifically with keyboard devices. Therefore, the appropriate category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2349 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2349
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bf7f219f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2349
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let me read the details carefully.
+
+The problem is that the keyboard and mouse aren't working in a macOS guest after exiting the EFI environment. They work in the OpenCore boot picker but not in the recovery system. The user mentioned that the mouse works if they force the PS2 controller and pause/resume the VM, referencing a specific GitHub issue. They tried adding PS2 kexts but QEMU's USB devices aren't attaching to the AppleUSBEHCI bus. It only works on Snow Leopard.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about keyboard and mouse not functioning correctly in a macOS guest. Since these are input devices, it's related to how QEMU handles peripherals. The fact that USB devices aren't attaching suggests a problem with device enumeration or driver interaction within the VM. This points towards a peripherals-related bug because it's specifically about hardware devices (keyboard, mouse) not working as expected.
+
+I don't think it's a boot issue because the problem occurs after exiting EFI. It's also not graphic, network, socket, or hypervisor related. The mention of PS2 and USB suggests it's about device handling within QEMU. Therefore, the appropriate category is peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2356 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2356
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3dea9725
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2356
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's see what the problem is.
+
+The user provided a log that says there was an assertion failure in `stm32l4x5_rcc.c` at line 546. The error message mentions that the value `val` exceeds `0b100`. So, this looks like a hardware-related issue because it's part of the RCC (Reset and Clock Control) module for the STM32L4x5 microcontroller.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce, they're using `qemu-system-aarch64` with specific machine options. The command writes 0xffffffff to address 0x40021008. This seems like an attempt to manipulate a hardware register in QEMU's simulation, possibly causing the RCC state to be set incorrectly.
+
+The bug is within the `rcc_update_cfgr_register` function, which suggests it's related to how QEMU handles the configuration of the clock and reset controls for the STM32 device. This falls under the peripherals category because it's dealing with hardware peripheral emulation in QEMU.
+
+I don't think it's a translation issue or assembly lowering, so "mistranslation" or "assembly" are out. It also doesn't seem to be about networking, sockets, VNC, or other common categories like performance or kernel issues. The problem is specific to the RCC hardware peripheral, making "peripherals" the correct category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an assertion failure in a function related to the STM32L4x5 microcontroller's Reset and Clock Control (RCC) module. This is part of QEMU's hardware emulation for peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/242 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/242
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..005c1035
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/242
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report about "Implementation of Virtual Battery for Battery Status" into one of the given categories. Let's see what each category means and which one fits best.
+
+The possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I think about what the bug report is about. It mentions "Virtual Battery for Battery Status." So this seems to relate to how QEMU emulates a battery in a virtual machine or device.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- Mistranslation: This would be related to incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, maybe in user-mode. Doesn't seem relevant here.
+- Assembly: Lowering assembly code. Probably not directly related to battery status.
+- Other: A catch-all category if none fit better.
+- Device: This could relate to emulating hardware devices within QEMU.
+- Graphic: Related to graphics rendering or display. Not sure, but maybe not directly unless it's about power management affecting the GPU, which is less likely here.
+- Socket: Networking sockets. Probably not relevant.
+- Network: Same as socket, probably not related.
+- KVM: Kernel-based virtual machine. Maybe, since QEMU often uses KVM for hypervisor tasks.
+- Boot: Could relate to boot issues, but battery status isn't directly about booting.
+- VNC: Remote desktop protocol. Unrelated here.
+- Debug: Tools or features for debugging, not relevant.
+- Files: Filesystem operations. Not matching.
+- Permissions: Access rights, probably not related.
+- Performance: Optimization issues. Doesn't fit.
+- Kernel: The Linux kernel aspects of QEMU, but battery is more about hardware emulation.
+- Peripherals: Devices connected to the system, like USB or other hardware. Since a battery is a hardware component, this might be relevant.
+- Hypervisor: Management of virtual machines, which QEMU does as a hypervisor. But this seems more about device emulation rather than VM management.
+
+So between "device" and "peripherals." The report talks about implementing the battery status, which is part of emulating hardware devices within the VM. In QEMU, such emulations are often handled under the " peripherals" category because they're additional hardware components attached to the virtual machine. Therefore, I think "peripherals" is the best fit here.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses implementing a virtual battery for battery status, which relates to emulating hardware within QEMU. This falls under the category of peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2468 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2468
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5ac3bb95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2468
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The bug is related to m68k: "movec to/from CAAR not emulated?" The user describes that when they start a machine with the Motorola MVME147 VME module, and step through the standard ROM (147BUG), running until a specific instruction `movec D1,CAAR`, QEMU throws an error about an unimplemented control register write.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others. 
+
+The issue is that a specific instruction (`movec`) involving CAAR isn't being emulated correctly in QEMU. The error message mentions an unimplemented control register write, which suggests it's related to how certain hardware registers are handled.
+
+Since the problem occurs during execution of a machine-specific instruction for the MVME147 module, which is a VMEbus card, this likely points to a missing or incorrect emulation in QEMU. The CAAR (Common Address/Attribute Register) is part of the M68030/M68040 CPUs and their bus protocols, so it's related to how peripherals or specific hardware features are emulated.
+
+The categories related to hardware components would be 'peripherals' or possibly 'device'. Since this is about a specific control register not being handled correctly in emulation, I think 'peripherals' fits better because it relates to the handling of hardware registers and their interactions within QEMU.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/247 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/247
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ea8ba749
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/247
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user mentioned "qemu-system-arm segmentation fault using pmemsave on the interrupt controller registers." 
+
+First, I'm looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others like mistranslation or assembly.
+
+The issue involves a segmentation fault when using pmemsave on interrupt controller registers. A segmentation fault usually points to an error in memory access. The interrupt controller is part of the system's hardware emulation, which would fall under device drivers or peripherals.
+
+So, this isn't related to user-mode issues like mistranslation or assembly lowering. It also doesn't fit categories like network or socket. Instead, it's about how QEMU handles specific devices, particularly their registers during debugging with pmemsave.
+
+Therefore, the most fitting category here is "peripherals" because it deals with device-specific operations within QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a segmentation fault when using `pmemsave` on interrupt controller registers in QEMU's ARM system. This points to an issue related to device hardware emulation, specifically how QEMU handles peripheral devices.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2497 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2497
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ba29824c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2497
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU. The user provided several possible categories, including things like 'mistranslation', 'assembly lowering', 'device', 'network', etc.
+
+Looking at the problem description: "QEMU doesn't currently implement the `FPIAR` register in the FPU which is fine in most cases but test code... detect a failure." The issue is specifically about an unimplemented register in the FPU (Floating Point Unit). 
+
+The categories I see are related to different aspects of QEMU functionality. Since this is about a missing hardware component (FPIAR register) that's part of the CPU's FPU, it falls under 'peripherals'. Peripheral devices include components like registers and devices attached to the CPU.
+
+Other possible categories were considered but don't fit as well. For example, 'mistranslation' relates to incorrect code translation, which isn't the case here. Similarly, 'assembly lowering' is about converting high-level code to assembly, not relevant to a missing register implementation.
+
+So, the correct category should be 'peripherals' because it's related to an unimplemented hardware component in the FPU.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2540 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2540
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4526ce5d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2540
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user is reporting an issue with the B-L475E-IOT01A machine in QEMU where the USART devices aren't functional. They mention that while the documentation says these devices are supported, they don't work when trying to write to UART via printf. 
+
+From their description, when running a minimal bare-metal binary, there's no output on the UART. During debugging, all the UART registers for USART1 are zero. Normally, according to the STM documentation, USART_ISR should have a default value of 0x020000C0, but it's not happening here. The code gets stuck in an infinite loop waiting for the module to be ready.
+
+They also note that when using a similar program on the netduino-plus-2 (another STM32 Cortex-M4 device), USART works fine. So the problem seems specific to QEMU's emulation of the B-L475E-IOT01A machine.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce, they involve compiling with a specific GCC version and running within QEMU. The key point is that in QEMU, the USART registers don't get initialized properly—they're all zeros instead of the expected values.
+
+Now, considering the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is related to hardware devices not functioning correctly in QEMU. USART is a peripheral device, so this likely falls under the 'peripherals' category. The problem isn't about translation from source to IR (mistranslation), nor assembly lowering. It's more about how QEMU emulates the hardware peripherals—specifically, the USART device not being initialized properly in the machine.
+
+I think the correct classification here is 'peripherals' because it's about the emulation of hardware devices like USART.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2610 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2610
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8e18d7c4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2610
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The bug is about "pl011: incorrect IBRD_MASK and FBRD_MASK." First, I should understand what PL011 refers to. PL011 is a universal asynchronous receiver/transmitter (UART) controller used in ARM-based systems.
+
+The issue mentions IBRD_MASK and FBRD_MASK. These terms relate to the baud rate divisor registers. Baud rate calculation is part of configuring serial communication, which involves hardware peripherals like the UART.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. Since this relates to a UART controller, which is a hardware peripheral, the category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to incorrect masks in the baud rate divisor registers of the PL011 UART controller, which is a hardware component. Therefore, it falls under the 'peripherals' category.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2660 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2660
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0b1f0dd6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2660
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "EDK2 subhook submodule missing" into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me start by understanding what each category means.
+
+First, looking at the list of categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report mentions "EDK2 subhook submodule missing." I'm not entirely sure about EDK2. From what I recall, EDK2 is related to UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface), which is used in firmware development. Subhook might be a specific part or module within EDK2 that's causing an issue.
+
+Now, considering the categories: Mistranslation would relate to incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, probably not here. Assembly lowering is about converting code to assembly, again maybe not directly related. Other could be a catch-all, but I want to see if it fits another category first.
+
+Device might refer to hardware devices emulated by QEMU. Graphic relates to display issues, socket and network to networking problems. KVM is for kernel-based virtualization; boot would be about the boot process. VNC is related to remote desktop access, debug to debugging features, files to file handling, permissions to access rights, performance to speed issues.
+
+Kernel could refer to the QEMU's own internal functions or parts interacting with the host OS kernel. Peripherals are hardware components emulated by QEMU, like USB devices, serial ports, etc. Hypervisor refers to software that runs virtual machines; KVM is actually a hypervisor, but this seems more specific to EDK2.
+
+EDK2 is often used for firmware support, especially UEFI-based firmware. If the subhook module is missing, it's probably part of how QEMU handles firmware or device initialization. Subhook might be a hook into certain functions during boot or runtime, which would be essential for peripherals or devices to function correctly.
+
+So, if the EDK2 submodule is missing, it could affect the interaction between the virtual machine and its hardware devices, which falls under peripherals. Alternatively, it could also impact the hypervisor's ability to manage these components, but I think peripherals is more specific here because it's about device support in QEMU.
+
+Wait, another angle: if EDK2 is part of the firmware setup, then maybe it's related to boot issues. But "subhook" suggests a hook into functions, which might be during the boot process or when devices are initialized. So perhaps it's tied more to how peripherals are handled rather than the hypervisor itself.
+
+Therefore, I think the most fitting category is 'peripherals' because it's about missing functionality related to device support in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2666 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2666
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1bc5d1d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2666
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify the bug report about OPENSTEP 4.2 not booting from a SCSI CD connected to am53c974 in QEMU. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The user mentioned that when they try to boot using QEMU with the specified command line, it goes through some initial steps but then fails because it finds too many LUNs and eventually gives up. They also noted a 0-sized disk being detected, which might be causing issues.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem seems related to how QEMU handles SCSI devices. The user is using an am53c974 controller, which suggests it's a SCSI-related issue. Since the system detects multiple LUNs and a 0-sized disk, this could be a problem with device detection or initialization in QEMU's SCSI emulation.
+
+The bug occurs during the boot process when trying to access the installation media via SCSI, so it's not a kernel or hypervisor issue directly but rather how devices are handled. It's more about peripheral devices and their drivers within QEMU.
+
+Considering the categories, 'peripherals' seems appropriate because it's related to device handling. Other categories like 'device' might be too broad, and this is specifically about SCSI and CD booting, which falls under peripherals.
+</think>
+
+The issue relates to how QEMU handles SCSI devices during boot. Since the problem occurs with device detection and involves a 0-sized disk, it falls under the category of 'peripherals'.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2771 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2771
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..062a4f77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2771
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The error message is:
+
+"qemu-system-x86_64: ../block/block-backend.c:1290: blk_in_drain: Assertion `qemu_in_main_thread()' failed."
+
+First, let me parse the components of this error. The file in question is block-backend.c, specifically line 1290. The function is blk_in_drain, and there's an assertion failure that we're not in the main thread.
+
+I remember that QEMU has a main thread where certain operations are supposed to be executed for safety reasons, especially when dealing with device-level interactions. Block operations involve handling storage devices, which could include things like hard drives, ISO images, etc. So, block-backend.c is part of the block layer in QEMU, managing how block devices are accessed and handled.
+
+The assertion failure here suggests that the code tried to execute blk_in_drain while not being on the main thread, but this operation was only supposed to happen there. This could be due to a concurrency issue or incorrect threading usage elsewhere in the code.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Block operations are typically related to storage devices, which fall under peripherals. The function name includes 'blk', which relates to block devices. So the category that makes sense here is 'peripherals'.
+
+I don't think it's a translation issue because the error is about threading and main thread checks, not semantic mapping. It's also not directly about performance or files, as those categories are more specific to other aspects.
+
+So, I'm leaning towards 'peripherals' as the category for this bug.
+</think>
+
+The assertion failure in block-backend.c likely relates to incorrect handling of block device operations outside the main thread, which falls under peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2774 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2774
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..210e08ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2774
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let me read the problem again.
+
+The user is suggesting adding an `aliases` node to the RISC-V Device Tree Blob (DTB) that includes `serial0` alias. They provided a link to an example in the Linux source code, specifically for the Sophgo CV1800B-Milkv-Duo SoC's Device Tree.
+
+First, I should recall what each category means. The categories given are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is about the Device Tree Blob (DTB), which in QEMU's context is used for device tree setup. The `aliases` node is part of the device tree structure that allows mapping between hardware components and their device names or aliases.
+
+Since this involves modifying the DTB to include a specific alias (`serial0`), it relates to how devices are defined and managed within the system. This falls under the broader category of device-related issues in QEMU, specifically dealing with peripheral devices because `serial0` is typically a serial port controller which is a peripheral.
+
+Looking at the categories again, "peripherals" seems the most fitting because it's about adding an alias for a hardware component that connects to the system. While it's within the context of device trees and could be related to the kernel or device management, the specific mention of adding an alias points towards how peripherals are handled in the device tree setup.
+
+Therefore, the category should be "peripherals."
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2783 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2783
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4300792d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2783
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out what category this bug report falls into. The user is having trouble installing Windows 7 32-bit on QEMU using the Q35 machine type. They mentioned that the keyboard and mouse don't work, so they can't proceed with the installation. 
+
+First, I'll recall the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals.
+
+The main issue here is that the mouse and keyboard aren't functioning during the installation. Since this happens with Q35 but works with i440FX, it's likely related to how the hardware is emulated in each machine type. The user also mentioned they can see the cursor when using i440FX, so it must be a problem specific to the Q35 setup.
+
+Looking at the categories, "peripherals" seems relevant because the keyboard and mouse are input devices, which fall under peripherals. The issue might be with how the Q35 machine type handles USB or PS/2 devices compared to i440FX. Maybe the input drivers aren't being properly configured in Q35 mode.
+
+I don't think it's a "boot" issue because the system does boot; it just can't interact with the installer. It's also not about the graphical display directly since the cursor doesn't appear, but that might be a symptom of the peripherals not working rather than a graphics problem itself.
+
+So, considering all this, I believe the category should be "peripherals" because the issue is related to input devices not functioning correctly in a specific machine type configuration.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where the keyboard and mouse do not function during the installation of Windows 7 when using the Q35 machine type. This suggests that there's a problem with how the input devices are handled under QEMU's Q35 setup compared to i440FX. Since the issue is related to hardware emulation, particularly concerning peripherals (keyboard and mouse), the appropriate category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2788 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2788
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6e994519
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2788
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's analyze this bug report. The user is experiencing issues where the keyboard and mouse aren't working after booting into their distro in QEMU. They mention that other distributions like Porteus and Tinycore work fine, so it's not a general issue with all distros.
+
+The problem occurs when using both VNC and SDL as display types, which suggests it might be related to how the input is handled by QEMU itself rather than the display type. They're also using a portable version of QEMU but encountered the same issue with the repository version, indicating it's likely not an installation-specific problem.
+
+The key point here is that input devices (mouse and keyboard) stop working after booting into the desktop. Since the clock runs and shutdown works correctly via the menu, the VM isn't frozen; it's just not accepting input. This points towards a configuration or driver issue within QEMU related to handling peripherals during the guest OS's runtime.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The failure is specifically with input devices not being recognized after boot. This seems to be related to how QEMU handles the mouse and keyboard in the guest OS, which falls under peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2812 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2812
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..51c161bf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2812
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Crash initializing audio device". The possible categories are listed, and I have to choose one.
+
+First, let me understand what each category means. Mistranslation is about incorrect semantic mapping in user-mode assembly. Assembly lowering is related to the process of converting high-level code to assembly. Other is for anything that doesn't fit elsewhere. Device probably refers to hardware device issues within QEMU. Graphic would be related to graphics rendering, socket to networking sockets, network to overall network functionality, KVM to Kernel-based Virtual Machine hypervisor, boot to startup issues, vnc to remote desktop services, debug to debugging tools, files to file handling, permissions to access rights, performance to speed issues, kernel to operating system kernel interactions, peripherals to hardware devices connected to the host, and hypervisor to virtualization management.
+
+The bug report mentions a crash initializing an audio device. Audio devices are typically handled as peripherals in QEMU because they interact with the host's hardware resources. So when QEMU initializes such a device and crashes, it likely falls under the category related to hardware devices connected to the system, which would be 'peripherals'. 
+
+I don't think it's assembly or mistranslation because those are more about code conversion issues. It's not network-related unless the audio uses some network features, but that seems less likely. The crash is specific to initializing a device, so peripherals makes sense.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a crash when initializing an audio device, which is a hardware device connected to the system. Therefore, it falls under the 'peripherals' category.
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2860 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2860
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..096202e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2860
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out what category this bug report falls into. The user mentioned that the PS2 keyboard isn't working after booting, but only when using libspice to connect. They also noted that when they start multiple QEMU VMs, some have this issue. However, rebooting or migrating fixes it.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce, starting 40 VMs asynchronously might be causing resource contention, which could affect input handling. The gdb debug shows a hang in "prepare_mmio_access" and mentions that keyboard events are added to the queue but not read, suggesting an issue with event processing.
+
+The PS2 keyboard is a hardware device, so this seems related to how QEMU handles peripherals. Since it's about device interaction, specifically the keyboard as a peripheral device, the category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2864 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2864
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d8db0a72
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2864
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's see what I need to do here. The user has provided a bug report related to QEMU and is asking me to classify it into one of several categories. They want just the category name as the response.
+
+First, I should read through the bug report carefully to understand the problem. The issue is with the mouse and keyboard behaving erratically when using `qemu-system-ppc` with the machine type `g3beige`. The user describes that the mouse clicks on its own and moves a terminal window unexpectedly. They've also mentioned that this happens not just in one environment but across different OSes like HelenOS, NetBSD, and macOS X/9 when booted via QEMU.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals. I need to figure out which one fits best.
+
+The problem is about input devices (mouse and keyboard) acting strangely within the QEMU VM. This suggests an issue with how QEMU handles input devices or their emulation. The terms 'device' seems relevant here because it's related to hardware emulation within the virtual machine environment.
+
+I should consider if any other categories might fit better. For example, 'peripherals' could also be a possibility since mice and keyboards are peripherals. However, in the context of QEMU, 'device' often refers more broadly to the emulated devices, which includes peripherals but is a bit more general.
+
+Looking at similar past issues or common classification practices, input device problems like mouse/keyboard behavior are typically categorized under 'peripherals'. But since 'peripherals' isn't one of the listed options, I might need to reconsider. Wait, checking again, yes, 'peripherals' is actually an option provided by the user.
+
+Wait no, in the categories given, 'peripherals' is indeed listed as a possible category. So perhaps that's the correct one here because it's specifically about the input devices which are peripherals within the virtual machine.
+
+However, I should double-check if any other category better fits. 'Kernel' might relate to system calls but doesn't seem directly relevant here. 'Device' could be too broad, whereas 'peripherals' is more specific to input/output devices like mouse and keyboard.
+
+Therefore, after careful consideration, the most appropriate category for this bug report would be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The issue described involves erratic behavior of mouse and keyboard inputs when running QEMU with specific machine configurations. This points to a problem in how input devices are emulated or handled within the virtual environment. Given the categories provided, the most fitting classification is **peripherals**, as it pertains to the handling of hardware devices like mice and keyboards in the VM.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2868 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2868
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cb587b44
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2868
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report where it says "amd iommu pte is only 32bits not 64bits." Let me think about what each category means.
+
+First, the possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about AMD IOMMU PTE being 32 bits instead of 64. IOMMU stands for Input/Output Memory Management Unit, which is part of the hardware that handles memory translations for devices accessing system memory.
+
+So, this seems related to how the QEMU emulator handles device-specific hardware components. Since it's about AMD IOMMU, which is a peripheral component, and the problem lies in the translation or handling within QEMU, the category should be something related to hardware or devices.
+
+Looking at the options, 'device' might not be specific enough, but since it's about IOMMU, which is a device-related issue. Alternatively, 'peripherals' could also make sense because IOMMU is part of the peripherals handled by QEMU.
+
+Wait, but in QEMU, hardware devices are emulated as peripherals, so maybe 'peripherals' is more precise here. However, sometimes IOMMU might be considered under the hypervisor's management since it's part of virtualization. But the issue is about incorrect PTE size, which seems like a translation or mapping problem within the device emulation.
+
+Alternatively, if the bug is in how QEMU handles the IOMMU tables (PTEs), perhaps it's an assembly lowering issue? No, that doesn't seem right. It's more likely related to device hardware simulation.
+
+So, 'peripherals' might be the category because it's about handling a specific peripheral component's data structures incorrectly.
+</think>
+
+The bug report concerns incorrect handling of IOMMU PTE sizes in QEMU for AMD devices, which falls under how the emulator handles device-specific hardware components. 
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2888 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2888
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..74a3d4a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2888
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to figure out which category this bug report falls into from the given options. Let's read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The user is experiencing an issue where their mouse pointer doesn't move when using USB pass-through in QEMU. They mention that the mouse works because hot corners trigger menu items, but the cursor remains stationary. The keyboard and Xbox controller are working fine, so it's specifically a problem with the mouse's cursor movement.
+
+They provided steps to reproduce: using a script with correct USB IDs for the mouse and keyboard. After booting the VM, the cursor doesn't move, even though other devices work. They also noted they're applying certain patches in QEMU and running specific kernel versions. Both QEMU 10.0-rc1 and 9.2.2 have this issue.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others like mistranslation or assembly lowering.
+
+The problem is about USB pass-through for a mouse. Since it's related to USB devices not functioning correctly in the VM, it likely falls under 'peripherals'. Alternatively, if it's a device that connects through the host's USB but isn't being recognized properly by QEMU or the kernel, maybe 'device' could be considered.
+
+But more specifically, the issue is with the pointer movement not registering, which is related to input handling. USB pass-through for devices like mice and keyboards falls under 'peripherals'. The fact that other devices work suggests it's an isolated issue in how the mouse is being handled in the VM's peripherals setup.
+
+So I think the correct category here would be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where the mouse pointer doesn't move when using USB pass-through in QEMU. The problem is specific to the mouse cursor not moving, despite the mouse functioning otherwise (e.g., triggering hot corners). Since this pertains to input devices and their functionality within the virtual machine environment, it falls under the 'peripherals' category.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/289 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/289
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..af180d54
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/289
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The report mentions that the guest system freezes until there's keyboard input on a Windows version. Let me think about what each category means.
+
+First, looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is that the guest freezes when there's no keyboard input. This sounds related to how virtualization handles user interaction. Since it's about a freeze upon certain conditions, it might be an input-related problem.
+
+Device category could be relevant because it's about hardware devices in the virtual machine. However, peripherals also relate to hardware devices, including keyboard and mouse.
+
+Wait, perhaps this is more about how the hypervisor or KVM handles user events. But the problem is happening within the guest OS, which might be related to how the host handles input redirection.
+
+Alternatively, it could be a performance issue if the system is waiting for input but not handling it properly, causing a stall. But performance issues usually involve things like CPU usage or memory, not specifically input.
+
+Looking back, the bug report mentions keyboard input, so it's likely related to how the virtual machine handles user peripherals. Therefore, the category should be 'peripherals' since it involves hardware devices in the guest OS.
+</think>
+
+The issue is about a freeze when there's no keyboard input, which relates to handling of user input devices in the virtual machine.
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2896 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2896
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..91a8a205
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2896
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report: "How to enable MPU support on Cortex-R5F?" The possible categories are things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, and others related to QEMU components.
+
+First, I need to understand what the query is about. The user is asking about enabling MPU (Memory Protection Unit) support for the Cortex-R5F processor. MPU typically refers to hardware in ARM processors that helps manage memory protection, which is crucial for security and isolating different parts of the system.
+
+Now, considering QEMU's architecture, it emulates various hardware components, including those related to CPU features like MPUs. The Cortex-R series is a line of high-performance ARM cores often used in embedded systems, so supporting their MPU would be important for accurate emulation.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: "mistranslation" relates to incorrect mapping from source to target during compilation or translation, which doesn't seem relevant here since this isn't about code translation. "Assembly lowering" is more about converting high-level code to assembly, which also doesn't fit. The other categories like device, graphic, network, KVM, etc., are specific areas within QEMU.
+
+Since the query is about enabling a hardware feature (MPU) on a specific CPU type (Cortex-R5F), it's likely related to how QEMU handles peripherals or hardware components. MPU support would fall under the "peripherals" category because it's a hardware-specific feature that needs to be configured and supported in the emulator.
+
+I don't think it fits into categories like performance, kernel, or hypervisor because those are broader areas not directly tied to enabling specific hardware features. It's more about adding or configuring a peripheral component within QEMU.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/292 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/292
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..00f2f846
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/292
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user provided a list of possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report mentions "keyboard errors in DOS" and refers to similar errors for reference. So the issue is related to keyboard functionality when running DOS under QEMU. 
+
+I need to map this to one of the given categories. Looking at the options:
+
+- Device: This usually relates to hardware devices, including input devices like keyboards.
+- Peripherals: Similar to device, but more specific to external devices connected to the system.
+
+Since keyboards are considered peripherals, especially when discussing their interaction in an emulated environment like QEMU, it makes sense that this falls under "peripherals." Alternatively, "device" could also be a contender, but "peripherals" is more precise here because we're talking about input devices typically handled as peripherals in an OS context.
+
+Therefore, the category should be "peripherals."
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2923 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2923
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e752ff43
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2923
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem description again.
+
+The user mentioned an "Audio crackling issue when USB headset is pass-through via usb-host". The specific problem occurs with a Logitech H340 headset that only supports 44100 Hz sampling rate, while headsets supporting 48000Hz work fine. This happens across different guest OS like Ubuntu and Windows.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+I need to figure out which category best fits this issue. The problem is related to audio crackling when using a USB headset in passthrough mode. Since it's about USB devices and their interaction with the host or guest systems, "peripherals" seems like a good fit. Alternatively, it could relate to device handling within QEMU.
+
+Wait, let me think again. The issue arises from the USB device (headset) not working correctly when passed through. It's specifically an audio problem because of sampling rates. Since this is related to how the USB device interacts with the audio subsystem in the guest OS via QEMU's device handling, "peripherals" makes sense as it deals with hardware devices attached to the virtual machine.
+
+Alternatively, could it be under "device"? But "peripherals" seems more specific to hardware devices connected through USB. So I'll go with peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2926 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2926
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..68df21c0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2926
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU. The user is experiencing excessive memory allocation on both the guest and host when GPU passthrough is enabled. They mention that even though the guest only has 8 GB allocated, the host allocates up to 64 GB.
+
+First, I'll look at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is related to GPU passthrough, which typically involves hardware devices and their resource allocation. Since it's about memory being allocated in excess when a physical GPU is passed through, this seems to involve how the host handles device resources for the guest. The problem occurs during VM setup with GPU passthrough, so it's likely tied to how QEMU manages such hardware.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'device' and 'peripherals' seem relevant because they pertain to hardware devices attached to the VM. However, 'device' is a more general category, while 'peripherals' might be more specific to input/output devices like GPUs. But in this context, since it's about GPU passthrough causing excessive memory allocation, I think 'peripheral' would fit as it relates directly to the hardware device being passed through.
+
+Alternatively, could it be 'hypervisor'? Since QEMU is a hypervisor (or part of it), but the issue is more about device management rather than the hypervisor itself. So maybe 'peripherals' is better because it's about how the GPU and memory are handled when devices are assigned to guests.
+
+So, I'll go with 'peripherals' as the category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where enabling GPU passthrough causes excessive memory allocation on both the host and guest systems. The problem arises specifically when the GPU is passed through to a virtual machine, leading to higher memory usage than intended. This relates to how hardware devices, particularly GPUs, are managed in QEMU. Since the issue pertains to device resource allocation, the most fitting category is 'peripherals'.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/294 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/294
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f6e8b005
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/294
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user provided possible categories like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others.
+
+The bug is about keyboard keys getting stuck in QEMU. So, first, I'm thinking about what part of QEMU handles the keyboard. QEMU emulates hardware devices, including input devices like keyboards. The keyboard emulation would be part of the device handling, possibly under the 'peripherals' category because it's related to external hardware emulation.
+
+Alternatively, maybe it's more about how the input is processed or passed through the hypervisor. But 'hypervisor' seems more related to managing virtual machines rather than specific hardware peripherals. 
+
+I think 'peripherals' makes more sense here because it directly relates to the keyboard as an emulated device in QEMU. So, when there are issues with input devices like keyboards, it's typically categorized under peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2941 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2941
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7313813e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2941
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out what category this bug report falls into. The user mentioned adding a board called "Macintosh llci". So, first, I need to understand what each category refers to.
+
+Looking at the list of categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The bug report is about adding a specific board, which suggests it's related to hardware or device support within QEMU. Adding a new board would typically involve modifying the code to recognize and handle this particular hardware configuration. Since boards in QEMU often relate to devices or peripheral components, I think "peripherals" might be the right category.
+
+Wait, but sometimes adding a board could also touch on device emulation. However, peripherals are more about individual devices attached to the system, while a board might encompass multiple devices. But since the user specifically mentioned adding a board, it's likely part of the device or perhaps the hypervisor if it's related to KVM, which is a type of virtualization.
+
+But considering that QEMU uses boards to define machine configurations, including various devices, I think "peripherals" might still be more accurate because it involves handling additional hardware components. Alternatively, it could fall under "device" as well, but the term "board" suggests a collection of devices rather than a single one.
+
+Wait again, maybe it's better to categorize it under "other" if none of the specific categories fit. But I'm not entirely sure. Since adding a board is part of defining the machine setup in QEMU, which could involve device configurations, perhaps "device" is more appropriate. Alternatively, it might be part of the hypervisor layer.
+
+Hmm, but without more context on what exactly the bug involves—like whether it's about device emulation or something else—it's tricky. Given that adding a board likely relates to the machine setup and hardware configuration, I'm leaning towards "device" as the category.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2973 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2973
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a7c66633
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/2973
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have this bug report for QEMU where the ast2700a0-evb machine hangs in U-Boot when trying to determine the RAM size if it's not set to 8 GB. Let me try to understand what's going on here.
+
+First, looking at the steps to reproduce: when using a BE host and running QEMU with -m 1g, the machine hangs. But when setting it to 8g, it works fine. The same applies to the ast2700a1-evb machine; both 1g and 8g work without issues.
+
+The problem seems specific to the ast2700a0-evb model when RAM isn't set to 8 GB. U-Boot reports DRAM as 8 GiB but then says effective 0 Bytes, which doesn't make sense. So maybe there's an issue with how QEMU is handling the memory configuration for this machine type.
+
+I know that QEMU uses device trees to describe hardware to the guest OS. If the RAM size isn't correctly set in the device tree for ast2700a0-evb, U-Boot might not be able to read it properly, leading to a hang or incorrect values.
+
+Looking at possible categories: This seems related to how QEMU configures devices and their properties, especially memory. The issue arises during boot when U-Boot is trying to determine the RAM size. Since this is about hardware configuration in QEMU's device model, it might fall under "peripherals" because we're dealing with machine-specific hardware components like the DRAM controller or memory setup.
+
+Other categories like "network" or "graphic" don't seem relevant here. It's not a translation issue ("mistranslation") since this is about hardware configuration in the device tree, which is part of the lower-level device modeling rather than instruction translation. 
+
+So, I think the category should be "peripherals."
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue with the ast2700a0-evb machine hanging during U-Boot's RAM size determination unless set to 8 GB. This points to a problem in how QEMU configures the device tree for memory, affecting hardware-specific behavior. 
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/303 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/303
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5e3ae0f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/303
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have this bug report to classify. The error message is an assertion failure in hw/usb/core.c at line 727. The specific issue is with the function usb_ep_get, where it's asserting that 'pid' must be either USB_TOKEN_IN or USB_TOKEN_OUT, but it failed. 
+
+First, I need to understand what this means. The code is part of QEMU, which is a hypervisor used for running virtual machines. So the bug is happening in the USB hardware emulation part of QEMU.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The function usb_ep_get seems related to USB endpoint handling. USB endpoints handle data transfer between the host and devices, and they have different types of transfers: IN and OUT are common directions. The assertion is checking that the token (pid) is either IN or OUT; if it's something else, this error occurs.
+
+Since this relates to USB device handling within QEMU, I think 'device' might be relevant because it's about a hardware component's behavior. However, since it's part of the hypervisor and directly related to how devices are emulated, maybe 'peripherals' is more accurate. Peripheral emulation in QEMU involves simulating hardware devices for the virtual machine.
+
+Alternatively, considering that USB handling is a specific device type, but 'peripherals' covers all such devices, so perhaps that's better. The error isn't about translation issues (so not mistranslation), nor assembly or other broad categories. It's about how QEMU handles a specific peripheral device's operations.
+
+So I'm leaning towards 'peripherals' as the category because it deals with the simulation of hardware devices in the hypervisor.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an assertion failure in USB endpoint handling within QEMU, which relates to peripheral device emulation.
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/304 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/304
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9881c737
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/304
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have to classify this bug report: "assertion failure in mptsas1068 emulator". The possible categories are things like mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others.
+
+First, I need to understand what the bug is about. The mention of "mptsas1068 emulator" stands out. MPTSAS1068 sounds like a specific piece of hardware, perhaps a storage controller or something related to SCSI devices. So this might be part of QEMU's device emulation.
+
+Looking at the categories, I see 'device' and 'peripherals'. Device seems more general, while peripherals could refer to specific hardware components like storage controllers. Since mptsas1068 is likely a peripheral device emulator, the category should probably be under peripherals.
+
+But wait, let me think again. Could this be related to another area? The bug is an assertion failure, which might point towards a logic error in the code rather than a hardware issue. However, since it's specific to the mptsas1068 emulator, it's more about how that device is being emulated.
+
+So between 'device' and 'peripherals', I think 'peripherals' is more accurate because it refers to the emulated hardware components in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions an assertion failure in the mptsas1068 emulator. Since mptsas1068 likely refers to a specific hardware component, probably related to storage or SCSI devices, this falls under the category of peripherals within QEMU's context.
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/316 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/316
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6504e481
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/316
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report: "[feature request] webcam support". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, the title says it's a feature request, so it might not be a bug. But I'm supposed to classify based on the content.
+
+Webcam support usually relates to hardware devices. In QEMU, webcam would fall under device emulation or peripheral devices because it involves handling input/output devices in the virtual machine.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'device' and 'peripherals' are options. 'Device' is broader, while 'peripherals' might be more specific to things like USB devices. Since a webcam could be considered a peripheral device, but sometimes categorized under general devices too.
+
+But wait, I think in QEMU terminology, peripherals often refer to input devices, which includes webcams. So maybe it's better to categorize as 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The feature request is about adding webcam support, which typically involves handling hardware devices or peripherals in a virtual environment. 
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/328 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/328
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2e4cb1ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/328
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "numerical keypad disabled by default in the guest". The possible categories are given as mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, let's break down what the bug is about. It mentions that the numerical keypad is disabled by default in the guest. The numerical keypad refers to the numpad on a keyboard, often used for entering numbers. In the context of QEMU, this likely relates to how input devices are handled in virtual machines.
+
+QEMU is a hypervisor that emulates hardware for virtual machines. When it comes to peripherals like keyboards and mice, QEMU has to correctly map physical device inputs to the guest OS. If the numerical keypad isn't working by default, it's probably an issue with how QEMU handles input devices or their configuration.
+
+Looking at the categories: "peripherals" seems relevant because it's about a hardware component (the keyboard's numpad) not functioning as expected in the VM. Other categories like device could be considered too, but peripherals is more specific to input and output devices.
+
+I don't think it's about translation or assembly since that would relate more to code conversion issues rather than device functionality. Graphic relates to display issues, socket and network are for connectivity, which doesn't fit here. KVM is a type of hypervisor but the issue is more about device handling. Boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel—none of these seem directly related to the keypad function.
+
+Therefore, "peripherals" seems like the most appropriate category because it's dealing with how an input device (keyboard) is being handled in the guest VM.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to a hardware component (numerical keypad) not functioning correctly in a virtual machine. This relates to input device handling within QEMU, which falls under peripherals.
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/338 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/338
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..296bc43b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/338
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The bug is titled "Null Pointer Failure in fdctrl_read() in hw/block/fdc.c". 
+
+First, looking at the file path: hw/block/fdc.c suggests it's related to floppy disk controllers. Floppy disks are a type of hardware peripheral.
+
+The function name is fdctrl_read(), which likely handles reading from the floppy drive controller. A null pointer failure here indicates that somewhere in this function, there's an attempt to dereference a null pointer, leading to a crash or incorrect behavior.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: 'peripherals' seems appropriate because fdc relates to hardware peripherals handled by QEMU. Other categories like 'device', 'graphic', etc., don't fit as well here. The issue isn't with assembly translation, performance, or network-related code but rather with a hardware component's driver.
+
+So, the correct category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a null pointer failure in the `fdctrl_read()` function located in `hw/block/fdc.c`. This file is part of QEMU and deals with floppy disk controllers, which are considered hardware peripherals. Therefore, the issue falls under the 'peripherals' category.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/349 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/349
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1c16c144
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/349
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report: "USB folder sharing causing segment fault." Let's break it down.
+
+First, "USB folder sharing" suggests that there's an issue related to USB devices and how files or folders are being shared using them. Segment fault usually refers to a memory access error where the program tries to access a memory location that doesn't exist or is protected.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: USB isn't listed directly, but "peripherals" includes devices like USB controllers. The issue seems hardware-related since it's about USB functionality causing a crash. It might involve how QEMU handles I/O or device drivers, which falls under peripherals.
+
+I don't see any mention of translation issues or assembly code, so "mistranslation" or "assembly" doesn't fit. It's not related to networking, graphics, sockets, etc., but rather a hardware peripheral causing a fault during operation.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/352 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/352
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..990c51fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/352
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report: "audio input crack". The user provided several categories like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, etc., and they want just one word as the answer.
+
+First, "audio input crack" sounds like an issue with audio. So I think about which category relates to audio. Looking at the list, there's a 'device' category, but also maybe others. But 'audio' isn't explicitly listed. Wait, in QEMU, audio issues usually fall under device or hardware emulation.
+
+Wait, let me check: the categories include device, graphic, network, KVM, etc. Since it's about input (crackling), it's related to how the audio is being handled by the virtual machine. So maybe 'device' because it's a hardware device emulation issue.
+
+Alternatively, sometimes audio could be under 'peripherals' but that category isn't listed here. Wait, looking back at the categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. No, 'peripherals' is actually listed as one of them.
+
+Wait no, in the list provided, it's:
+
+mistranslation
+assembly
+other
+device
+graphic
+socket
+network
+KVM
+boot
+vnc
+debug
+files
+permissions
+performance
+kernel
+peripherals
+hypervisor
+
+So 'peripherals' is a category. But does this bug relate to a peripheral device? Yes, audio input is a peripheral device.
+
+But wait, sometimes in QEMU, the audio might be handled under different components like the声卡 emulation or through specific drivers, which could fall under 'device'. Alternatively, it's part of the overall peripherals handling.
+
+Hmm. The term "crack" usually refers to an issue with sound quality, so perhaps it's a problem with how the audio is being processed. In QEMU, this might be part of the emulation of audio devices or the way the host and guest interact in terms of audio input.
+
+But looking at the categories, 'device' seems more likely because it's about emulating an audio device. Alternatively, sometimes network issues can have similar symptoms, but no, this is specifically audio input.
+
+Wait, maybe it's under 'graphic'? No, graphics would relate to display issues, not sound. So 'peripherals' might be the right category since it's related to input devices like a microphone or sound card.
+
+Alternatively, if the bug report was about output crackling, it could still be under peripherals. But in this case, it's specifically audio input crack.
+
+I think 'device' is the more precise category here because it's about the hardware device (audio) emulation in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/357 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/357
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7a3dc829
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/357
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "race condition in hw/input/pckbd.c causes wrong data to be read on interrupts." The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I'll break down the bug report. It mentions a race condition in hw/input/pckbd.c. The file name suggests it's related to keyboard handling in hardware input. A race condition typically involves timing issues where two or more parts of a system access shared data without proper synchronization, leading to incorrect behavior.
+
+The issue causes wrong data to be read on interrupts. So, when an interrupt occurs, the data being read isn't correct. Since this is happening in the pckbd.c file, which handles keyboard input, it's likely related to hardware device handling.
+
+Looking at the categories: peripherals would include devices like keyboards, mice, etc. So a bug in hw/input/pckbd.c that affects interrupt handling sounds like a peripheral issue. 
+
+I don't think it's mistranslation because that's more about instruction translation in QEMU. It's not assembly lowering either since that's about converting high-level code to assembly. The other categories don't seem to fit as well—like graphic would be display issues, network is for networking, etc.
+
+So, the race condition causing wrong data on interrupts in a hardware input device suggests it falls under peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/368 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/368
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..feb1d862
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/368
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report. The issue is about virtiofsd not guaranteeing write access for users allowed by group permissions.
+
+First, I should understand what each category means. Looking through the list: mistranslation relates to incorrect semantic mapping in user-mode assembly; assembly is about lowering code into assembly; other is a catch-all. Then there are categories like device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report mentions group permissions and write access, which seems related to how users and groups interact with file systems in the virtualized environment. The component involved is virtiofsd, which I believe is part of VirtIO, providing filesystem services over VirtIO. 
+
+VirtIO devices are managed by the hypervisor (QEMU) and allow communication between guest OS and host hardware without specific device drivers. So virtiofsd falls under the peripherals category because it's a virtual device providing file system access.
+
+The issue is about permissions and ensuring users have write access as intended, which ties into how the hypervisor manages these permissions for virtual devices. Therefore, this should be categorized under 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/375 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/375
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..494ac166
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/375
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this classification problem step by step. The task is to categorize a given bug report into one of several predefined categories related to QEMU. 
+
+First, I'll read the bug report carefully: "MacOS 11.4 (x86_64) Host - USB passthrough appears to be broken." So, the issue is about USB passthrough not working on macOS 11.4 when using QEMU.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and mistranslation (under assembly). 
+
+USB passthrough typically relates to how devices are handled in virtual machines. In QEMU, this involves emulating or passing through hardware devices so the VM can use them. Since USB is a type of peripheral device, the most fitting category seems to be 'peripherals'.
+
+I should consider other options too. Is it related to network? No, because USB isn't network-related. Graphic issues would pertain more to display problems. Socket and kernel seem less likely here. KVM is about hypervisors but the problem is specifically with device passthrough, not the hypervisor itself.
+
+So, 'peripherals' seems the correct category as it directly relates to hardware devices like USB being passed through in a VM.
+</think>
+
+The bug report concerns USB passthrough functionality, which falls under hardware device management. In QEMU, this typically involves how peripherals are handled and made available to virtual machines. Therefore, the appropriate category is:
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/387 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/387
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..081dbe20
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/387
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "SD-Card not working anymore on x86 targets". The possible categories are things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, and others like device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. 
+
+First, the issue is about an SD-Card not working. That sounds like a hardware peripheral problem because an SD-card is a piece of hardware connected to the system. So in QEMU, which emulates hardware for virtual machines, peripherals would include things like USB devices, storage (like SD cards), network adapters, etc.
+
+Looking at the categories, "peripherals" seems to fit here because it's related to how the virtual machine interacts with devices. The bug isn't about translation issues or performance; it's specifically about the SD-Card not functioning, which is a hardware device in the VM environment.
+
+I don't think it's under 'device' because that might be too vague. It's more specific to peripherals connected via some interface. Also, other categories like graphic or network don't fit here since those are different types of devices.
+
+So, yeah, the correct category should be "peripherals" because it's about an SD-Card, which is a hardware peripheral in the QEMU environment.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/410 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/410
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ce049e45
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/410
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Abort in audio_bug triggered in sb16/pl041". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, looking at the bug report. It mentions an abort happening in "audio_bug" and it's triggered in "sb16/pl041". I'm not too familiar with all the components of QEMU, but from what I remember, sb16 is a sound card device and pl041 might be related to audio as well.
+
+So, the bug is about an abort occurring during audio processing. The categories related to hardware devices are device, peripherals. Since it's about audio, which falls under peripherals or specific hardware handling.
+
+Looking at the categories: device seems more general, while peripherals is a bit broader but could also apply. However, "sb16" and "pl041" are both specific sound card devices, so perhaps they fall under the 'device' category.
+
+Wait, another thought: sometimes in QEMU, audio drivers or emulation might be part of the 'peripherals' since they're emulating hardware devices for the virtual machine. So maybe peripherals is a better fit here.
+
+But also, device could refer to any hardware device being emulated by QEMU, including sound cards, so it's a bit ambiguous.
+
+I think the key here is that it's an audio-related bug in a specific device emulator. Since 'peripherals' would include all such devices, but 'device' might be more general. Alternatively, maybe there's a category for 'audio', but I don't see that option.
+
+Looking back at the categories provided: other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+So among these, 'peripherals' seems to be the most appropriate because it's about a specific hardware device (sound card) in QEMU. Alternatively, 'device' is another option, but I think 'peripherals' might be more precise here since it's about emulating an audio device.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an abort during audio processing related to sound card devices, which falls under the category of peripherals being emulated by QEMU.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/423 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/423
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5bbded98
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/423
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The issue is about not being able to hotplug an NVMe disk after it has been removed. So, first, I need to understand what each category means.
+
+Looking at the list of categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is related to NVMe disks, which are storage devices. Hotplugging refers to adding or removing hardware while the system is running. The fact that it's not working after removal suggests an issue with how the device is handled post-removal.
+
+Now, considering the categories: 'device' seems like a likely fit because it's about handling of physical devices. Peripherals could also be relevant since NVMe disks are peripherals. However, 'peripherals' might be more specific to input/output devices rather than storage.
+
+Wait, but storage devices can fall under both 'device' and 'peripherals'. But in the context of QEMU, which often deals with emulating hardware, 'device' is a broader category that could encompass all types, including storage. Alternatively, since NVMe is a specific type of storage controller, it might be more precise to categorize this under 'peripherals'.
+
+But looking back at the possible categories provided, 'peripherals' is listed as one of them. So perhaps the issue is better categorized under 'peripherals' because it's about the handling of a specific hardware peripheral (the NVMe disk) in terms of hotplugging.
+
+Wait again, maybe not. Because 'device' could be more general, covering all kinds of devices including storage. However, since it's specifically an issue with the NVMe controller and its interaction during hotplug after removal, perhaps it's better under 'peripherals'.
+
+Hmm, but sometimes in QEMU, device management is handled under 'devices', so maybe that's the intended category here.
+
+Alternatively, considering that hotplugging involves adding or removing devices while running, which is a feature of the hypervisor or the virtualization layer. But I'm not sure if it falls under 'hypervisor' because the problem is more about device handling rather than the hypervisor itself.
+
+Wait, maybe it's neither. The issue is with how QEMU handles hotplugging after removal, which could be an issue in device management, so 'device' might still be appropriate.
+
+Alternatively, perhaps 'other' if none of the specific categories fit. But since 'peripherals' and 'devices' are both options, I need to decide which is more accurate.
+
+I think 'peripherals' is more precise here because it's about a specific hardware peripheral (the disk) and its interaction with hotplugging. So I'll go with 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/431 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/431
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..45199751
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/431
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "USB passthrough in Windows Host non functional." Let me think through how to approach this.
+
+First, I should understand what each category means based on the list provided. The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is about USB passthrough not working in a Windows host environment. USB passthrough usually refers to allowing the guest operating system (in this case, probably running under QEMU) to access the host's USB devices directly. This feature typically involves the hypervisor or the virtualization layer interacting with hardware resources.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- Mistranslation is about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture; not relevant here.
+- Assembly and other seem unrelated.
+- Device: This could be a general category, but maybe more specific ones apply.
+- Peripherals: USB devices are peripherals. So this might fit under 'peripherals' since it's related to hardware devices connected to the system.
+
+Alternatively, since USB passthrough involves virtualization features and hardware resources allocation, it might also relate to the hypervisor itself, which is another category provided. The hypervisor is responsible for managing hardware resources and assigning them to VMs.
+
+In QEMU, when you set up USB passthrough, the host's USB controller needs to be passed through or shared with the guest. This process involves the hypervisor (like KVM in QEMU) correctly handling the hardware. If it's non-functional, it could be a problem within the hypervisor layer or how peripherals are being managed.
+
+Considering that the issue is about allowing access to hardware devices and their functionality under virtualization, 'peripherals' seems appropriate as it directly relates to hardware device interaction within the virtual environment. However, since USB passthrough is a feature provided by the hypervisor's management of resources, maybe 'hypervisor' would be more accurate.
+
+But I should think about what each category encompasses. The 'hypervisor' category might cover issues related to how QEMU itself manages virtualization, including things like CPU allocation, memory, and hardware devices. On the other hand, 'peripherals' might refer more to specific device handling beyond just USB.
+
+Wait, another angle: USB passthrough is a feature that's part of the hypervisor's capabilities in managing I/O resources for VMs. So if it's not functional, the problem lies within how QEMU/KVM handles the hardware devices and their access from the guest. This would fall under 'hypervisor' because it's about the virtualization layer's management.
+
+Alternatively, since USB is a peripheral device, maybe 'peripherals' is better. But in this context, it's about the passthrough mechanism, which is more of a hypervisor function.
+
+Hmm, I'm a bit torn between 'hypervisor' and 'peripherals.' Since the issue is about the functionality of passing through hardware devices to the guest, which is handled by the hypervisor layer, I think 'hypervisor' might be the correct category. But sometimes such issues are categorized under device or peripherals. However, given that the problem is specifically about USB passthrough in a virtualized environment, it's more aligned with the hypervisor's responsibilities.
+
+But wait, looking at the list again: 'device' and 'peripherals' are separate categories. Since USB is a type of peripheral, maybe 'peripherals' is more precise here. However, sometimes bugs related to hardware passthrough fall under 'hypervisor.' I'm not entirely sure, but based on standard categorization practices, this might be considered a hypervisor issue because it's about how the host handles and allocates hardware resources to VMs.
+
+No, actually, perhaps 'peripherals' is more accurate here. USB devices are peripherals, and if they're not functioning correctly in passthrough mode, it's an issue with how the peripherals are handled within the virtualization environment. The hypervisor might be involved, but the specific problem is about device access, which would fall under 'peripherals.'
+
+I'm still a bit uncertain, but considering that USB passthrough pertains to devices being accessed by the guest OS, it's more related to peripheral handling rather than the hypervisor itself.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/441672 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/441672
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c50b0e48
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/441672
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories for QEMU. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The user mentioned a problem where Windows XP crashes with a BSOD when an HP Photosmart USB device is attached. They were testing whether the USB device works and encountered these crashes on a Fedora Rawhide system using qemu-kvm version 0.11.0-2.fc12.x86_64.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue involves a USB device causing crashes. Since it's related to peripheral devices and their interaction with QEMU, the category that fits is 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/445 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/445
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..07b6cf45
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/445
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report: "QEMU + DOS keyboard behavior." Let me break it down step by step.
+
+First, QEMU is an emulator and a hypervisor, right? It allows running virtual machines and other system emulations. So any bug in QEMU would relate to how it handles the environment it's providing for the guest OS.
+
+The bug report mentions "DOS keyboard behavior." That makes me think about how the keyboard is handled under DOS within a QEMU VM. The DOS keyboard typically refers to older, pre-Windows 95 keyboards, which might have different key layouts or behaviors compared to modern ones.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others. 
+
+"DOS keyboard behavior" sounds like it's related to hardware peripherals because the keyboard is a peripheral device. So under QEMU, if there's an issue with how the DOS keyboard behaves in a VM, that would be a problem with the emulation of the keyboard as a device.
+
+I don't think it's "graphic" because that would relate more to display issues. It's not about network or socket operations either. Since it's specifically about the keyboard, which is an input device, the category should fall under peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/446 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/446
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7363a3a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/446
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "usb-audio does not work with Mac OS". The possible categories are quite a few, including things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others.
+
+First, I'll break down the bug report. It's about USB audio not working on Mac OS. So, the issue is related to hardware devices, specifically a USB device (audio), not functioning correctly in QEMU when used with macOS.
+
+QEMU is an emulator and virtualization software that can emulate various hardware. Since it's dealing with USB audio, which is a peripheral device, this falls under the category of peripherals. The other options like network or graphic don't seem to fit because the problem isn't about networking or display issues. It's specifically about the USB audio device not working.
+
+I should also consider if it could be related to KVM or hypervisor, but those are more about virtualization management rather than specific hardware devices. Similarly, 'device' is a broader category, but since USB audio is a peripheral, 'peripherals' might be more precise here.
+
+Looking at the list again, 'peripherals' seems to be the most accurate category for an issue with a specific device like USB audio not functioning properly.
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions that USB audio isn't working on macOS. Since USB audio devices are peripherals and this is about them not functioning correctly in QEMU, the appropriate category is peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/459 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/459
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0db145a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/459
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem and understand what's going on.
+
+The issue is with the bcm2835_aux device in the Raspi3 board. When a bare-metal app reads the AUX_MU_STAT_REG MMIO register and the receive FIFO is full, an assertion fails because s->read_count equals BCM2835_AUX_RX_FIFO_LEN. The user points out that the manual says this is allowed.
+
+So, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is with an MMIO register and a hardware device's FIFO buffer. The assertion in QEMU's code is incorrect because it doesn't allow the read_count to be equal to the FIFO length, which according to the manual is acceptable. This suggests that QEMU isn't correctly modeling the hardware behavior, leading to a failed assertion.
+
+Since this involves a hardware peripheral (the AUX device) and how QEMU emulates its behavior, the category should relate to peripherals. The issue isn't about translation between architectures, assembly code lowering, or any of the other categories like network or socket. It's specifically about how QEMU handles the device's registers and their state.
+
+Therefore, the correct classification is 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an incorrect assertion in QEMU related to handling the receive FIFO buffer for a hardware peripheral (bcm2835_aux). The issue arises because the assertion fails when the read count equals the FIFO length, which is allowed by the hardware manual. This pertains to how QEMU models the device's behavior.
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/468 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/468
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a2a80e2f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/468
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Zynq7000 UART clock reset initialization". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Let me break down the terms here. Zynq7000 is a specific chip from Xilinx, known for being an All Programmable SoC. UART stands for Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter; it's a common hardware component used for serial communication. Clock reset initialization refers to how the clock and reset signals are set up when initializing the UART.
+
+Since this involves hardware components like the UART in the Zynq7000, which is part of the device's peripherals, I think the category should be 'peripherals'. This relates to the initialization of hardware devices within QEMU. It doesn't seem to fall under any other categories like network or socket, as it's about hardware setup rather than communication protocols or virtualization aspects.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/481 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/481
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f53fa471
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/481
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Implement I2C for BCM2835 (raspi)". Let me think through this step by step.
+
+First, I'm looking at the categories provided. The options are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is about implementing I2C for BCM2835, which is related to the Raspberry Pi. I know that BCM2835 refers to a specific processor used in Raspberry Pi devices. I2C is a communication protocol used between devices, often in embedded systems. 
+
+So, the task here is to add support or implement the I2C functionality for this processor. Now, looking at the categories: device might be relevant because it's about hardware components, but peripherals also come into mind since I2C typically involves peripheral devices communicating with a microcontroller.
+
+I'm trying to decide between 'device' and 'peripherals'. The 'peripherals' category seems more specific to add-ons or external hardware components that the system interacts with. Since I2C is used for such peripherals, like sensors or other connected devices, this would fall under peripherals.
+
+Alternatively, 'device' could be a broader category, but it's not as precise in this context. So, considering specificity and relevance, 'peripherals' seems like the right classification here.
+</think>
+
+The bug report focuses on adding I2C support for BCM2835, which is used in Raspberry Pi devices. Since I2C is typically used for peripheral devices, the most appropriate category is peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/495 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/495
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..44dd3efe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/495
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. The bug is about an assertion failing in the sdhci component. The message says "Assertion wpnum < sd->wpgrps_size failed." 
+
+First, let me understand what this means. SDHCI stands for Secure Digital Host Controller Interface. It's related to how the system interacts with SD cards or other similar storage devices. The assertion is checking that a variable 'wpnum' (write protect number?) is less than 'sd->wpgrps_size'. If it's not, an error occurs.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others. 
+
+The bug is within the sdhci component, which deals with SD cards and similar storage devices. So it's related to hardware peripherals because the SD card is a peripheral device attached to the system. The issue isn't about translation between architectures or assembly code; it's more about how the host interacts with the device.
+
+Peripherals are components like USB devices, network interfaces, storage devices (like SD cards), etc., that connect to the computer. Since this is about an SD card's write protect feature, it fits under peripherals. It doesn't relate to graphics or networking. Also, KVM relates more to virtualization, which isn't directly mentioned here.
+
+So the category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/500 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/500
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f2dbd604
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/500
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The report says "6.1.0-rc0 Regression: Parameter 'audiodev' is missing." Let me think about what each category means.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug mentions 'audiodev' being missing. Audiodev is related to audio devices in QEMU. So it's probably a hardware-related issue, specifically with the device handling. Audio devices are considered peripherals because they're attached to the virtual machine for sound output or input.
+
+So, the categories that come to mind are 'device' and 'peripherals'. But 'audiodev' is more specific to audio which falls under peripherals rather than a general device. However, in QEMU, 'device' could also refer to hardware devices in general. I'm not sure if there's a more precise category here.
+
+Alternatively, maybe it's part of the hypervisor or kernel? No, that doesn't seem right. It's about missing parameters for audio, which is an input/output device, so peripherals makes sense.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/501 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/501
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d35b3f35
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/501
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The bug is titled "6.1.0-rc0 Regression: No keyboard input possible". Let me think about what each category means.
+
+First, looking at the list of categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is about not being able to get keyboard input. That sounds like an issue with how the virtual machine or emulator is handling hardware devices, specifically the keyboard. So maybe it's related to device support.
+
+In QEMU, the keyboard is typically handled as a device. If there's no keyboard input possible, it could be a problem in the device emulation or how the VM interacts with host peripherals. So 'peripherals' seems like a likely category since it involves hardware devices connected to the virtual machine.
+
+Other options like network or socket don't seem relevant here because those deal with communication over networks or sockets, which isn't the case for keyboard input. Similarly, boot or vnc are more about system startup or remote access, not input handling. 
+
+So, I'm leaning towards 'peripherals' as the correct category for this bug.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to keyboard input, which falls under hardware device interaction in a VM context.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/507 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/507
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f45754b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/507
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the category for this bug report related to QEMU. The user provided some information about a test failure involving a serial error in QEMU's gdb sim machine.
+
+First, I'll look at the details of the problem. The test hangs occasionally because the console emits an error and doesn't find the expected content. The error messages include "overrun error," "frame error," and "parity error" on the serial port ttySC0. These errors are typically related to how the serial communication is handled in hardware or software.
+
+The user mentioned that the test is more likely to fail when running on a single CPU with taskset, which suggests there might be an issue with concurrency or resource management. However, it's not clear if this is a kernel problem or something within QEMU.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others.
+
+The errors are related to serial communication. In QEMU, devices like the serial port are emulated as peripherals. So if there's an issue with how the serial device is handled in the emulator, it would fall under the 'peripherals' category.
+
+I don't think it's a kernel issue because the problem occurs in user-mode tests within QEMU. It's not related to network, socket, or graphic issues either. The errors are specific to the serial device, so peripherals seems like the right fit.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/521994 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/521994
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1fb6f5c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/521994
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm looking at this bug report where Windows 98 isn't detecting the mouse in QEMU with SeaBIOS. The user provided some debug output which shows that there are issues with the PS/2 controller.
+
+First, the error messages mention "ps2_recvbyte timeout" multiple times, which indicates a problem with the PS/2 communication. Since the mouse typically uses the PS/2 interface, this points towards an issue with how QEMU or SeaBIOS handles the PS/2 devices.
+
+Looking at the commit mentioned, it switched from pc-bios to seabios. So perhaps this change introduced some regression in the handling of PS/2 devices. The debug output shows that there are no serial ports found and mentions the PS/2 irq but no data, which suggests that the mouse (a PS/2 device) isn't being properly initialized or recognized.
+
+The possible categories include "peripherals" which covers hardware devices like mice and keyboards connected to the system. Since the issue is specifically with the mouse not being detected, which is a peripheral device, this seems to fit under the peripherals category.
+
+Other possibilities were considered, like whether it's related to network (since some devices use similar communication), but since the problem is about PS/2 and SeaBIOS, it's more aligned with how peripherals are handled in the BIOS.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/532 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/532
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2e560a9d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/532
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. The title is "USB-EHCI: Replace DMA processing in I/O handlers by asynchronous BH." Let me break it down.
+
+First, USB-EHCI refers to the Enhanced Host Controller Interface for USB devices. So, this is related to handling USB devices under QEMU.
+
+The bug report mentions replacing DMA (Direct Memory Access) processing in I/O handlers with asynchronous Bottom Halves (BH). Asynchronous here suggests that instead of processing these operations synchronously within the main thread, they're being moved to a separate thread or task to handle them later. This is common in systems where blocking operations need to be offloaded to prevent delays.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others like mistranslation or assembly lowering. 
+
+Since this is about USB devices (which are peripherals) and involves I/O handling and DMA processing, which relates to device drivers or the management of hardware devices within the emulator. Asynchronous BH suggests it's part of the device's I/O processing mechanism.
+
+Considering that EHCI is a controller for USB devices, this bug is likely in the peripheral handling code. So, 'peripherals' seems like the most fitting category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves modifying USB-EHCI to handle DMA asynchronously using Bottom Halves, which relates to device driver management and I/O processing for peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/533613 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/533613
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e4750a25
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/533613
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification. The user mentioned that the fr-ca keymap in QEMU is wrong, affecting projects like Xen. They also noted that the documentation isn't clear enough for them to create a patch but managed to fix some keys like dot and slash.
+
+First, I need to understand what each category entails. The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about the keymap for the French Canadian keyboard layout being incorrect. Keymaps typically relate to how input devices (like keyboards) are handled by the system. In QEMU, this would fall under the realm of device emulation or handling input peripherals.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'peripherals' seems appropriate because it's related to how the virtual machine handles keyboard input, which is a peripheral device. The keymap issue isn't about translation errors, assembly code, or network-related problems. It's more about incorrect hardware emulation.
+
+I don't think it's 'device' alone because that could be too broad. 'Peripherals' specifically refers to input/output devices like keyboards, mice, etc., which aligns with the bug report. The other categories like 'graphic' might relate if it were a display issue, but this is about key mappings.
+
+So, after considering all options, 'peripherals' is the most fitting category for this bug report.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses an incorrect keymap affecting the French Canadian keyboard layout in QEMU/KVM. This issue relates to how input devices (keyboards) are handled within the virtual machine environment. Since keymaps pertain to the handling of input peripherals, the appropriate category is:
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/544 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/544
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..946940b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/544
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. The bug is about an assertion that checks if `xfer->packet.status` is not equal to `USB_RET_NAK` in the xHCI context. 
+
+First, I should understand what xHCI stands for. XHCI refers to the USB Host Controller (x86) driver, which handles USB devices from the host's perspective. The bug involves an assertion failure related to a USB transfer status.
+
+The assertion is checking that the packet's status isn't `USB_RET_NAK`. In USB communication, `NAK` is a response indicating that the device did not accept the data and expects more. So if this assertion fails, it suggests there might be a problem with how USB transfers are being handled by QEMU.
+
+Looking at the categories provided:
+
+- **mistranslation**: Incorrect mapping from source to IR/target in user-mode.
+- **assembly**: Issues during assembly lowering.
+- **other**: Miscellaneous bugs not fitting other categories.
+- **device**: Probably relates to device handling.
+- **graphic**: Graphics-related issues.
+- **socket**: Socket operations.
+- **network**: Networking problems.
+- **KVM**: Kernel-based Virtual Machine hypervisor issues.
+- **boot**: Boot process bugs.
+- **vnc**: VNC server/client problems.
+- **debug**: Debugging tools or features.
+- **files**: File I/O issues.
+- **permissions**: Access permissions problems.
+- **performance**: Performance-related bugs.
+- **kernel**: Kernel-level issues in QEMU's kernel mode code.
+- **peripherals**: Issues with hardware peripherals, like USB devices.
+- **hypervisor**: Problems related to the hypervisor layer.
+
+The bug is about a USB transfer status. Since USB devices are peripherals attached to the host machine, this seems to fall under the "peripherals" category. Alternatively, it could be considered under "device" if it's more about device management, but "peripherals" feels more specific here as it directly relates to handling of hardware devices connected via USB.
+
+I don't think it's about network because USB devices aren't network interfaces. It's also not related to graphics or VNC. The failure is in the xHCI driver, which deals with USB devices, so "peripherals" makes sense.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an assertion in the USB transfer handling within QEMU's xHCI implementation. Since this pertains to how USB peripherals are managed, the appropriate category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/550 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/550
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4de55cc4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/550
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report: "FPE in npcm7xx_adc_convert". The categories given are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I need to understand what FPE means. I think it stands for Floating-Point Exception, which is an error that occurs during floating-point operations. So the bug is related to a floating-point issue in some code.
+
+Next, looking at "npcm7xx_adc_convert". The "npcm" part might refer to a specific processor or chip, possibly the Nuvoton PC-M series. "ADC" stands for Analog-to-Digital Converter, which is a hardware component that converts analog signals to digital ones. So, npcm7xx_adc_convert probably handles the conversion process in this ADC.
+
+Putting it together, the bug is about an exception happening during the ADC conversion on a specific processor. Since ADCs are part of hardware peripherals, and given the categories, "peripherals" seems like the most fitting category. It doesn't fall under user-mode translation issues (mistranslation), assembly code (assembly), or any other listed category like network or graphic errors.
+
+I don't think it's related to kernel mode or hypervisor because ADC conversion is a hardware function handled by device drivers, which are part of peripherals. So the classification should be "peripherals".
+</think>
+
+The bug report relates to an issue in hardware peripheral code, specifically involving an ADC component on a processor. 
+
+**Step-by-step explanation:**
+1. FPE indicates a floating-point exception.
+2. npcm7xx refers to a specific processor or chip.
+3. adc_convert pertains to ADC functionality, a hardware component.
+4. Therefore, the bug is related to hardware peripherals.
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/551 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/551
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a74637fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/551
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Null-ptr dereference in megasas_command_complete". The possible categories are things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, and others related to QEMU components.
+
+First, the term "null-ptr dereference" means that somewhere in the code, a pointer that's null is being accessed. That usually causes a crash or an error because you can't access memory through a null pointer. So this is likely a programming bug where a pointer isn't properly initialized or checked before use.
+
+Now, looking at "megasas_command_complete". I know that MEGASAS refers to a type of storage controller, specifically from LSI (now Broadcom), used in servers. In QEMU, the megasas part would relate to the emulation of this controller for virtual machines. So the bug is happening within the code that handles the completion of commands sent to this storage controller.
+
+The categories given include things like 'device', which might make sense because it's related to a hardware device being emulated. But I'm not sure if that's the best fit here. The issue is more about a programming error causing a crash, rather than a feature or behavior of the device emulation itself.
+
+Looking at other categories: 'hypervisor' could be relevant since QEMU acts as a hypervisor when using KVM. However, this bug doesn't seem to relate directly to the hypervisor's management of VMs but rather to a specific component within it (the storage controller).
+
+The 'graphic' or 'network' categories don't seem related here. 'Permissions' and 'files' also don't fit. The issue is more about a code error leading to a crash, so maybe 'other' would be the best category if none of the specific ones apply.
+
+Wait, but the bug is in the megasas part, which might fall under 'peripherals' since it's emulating hardware peripherals for the VM. So perhaps 'peripherals' is the correct category. Alternatively, since the crash is due to a null pointer dereference, maybe it's better classified under 'other' because it's a general programming error rather than a specific feature.
+
+But I think the bug report mentions a component that's part of QEMU's device emulation, so perhaps 'device' or 'peripherals'. However, considering the categories provided, 'hypervisor' might not fit unless it's related to how the hypervisor handles devices. Alternatively, since this is a crash in a specific driver (megasas), maybe it should be under 'other' because it's a software bug rather than a feature category.
+
+Hmm, I'm a bit torn here. On one hand, 'peripherals' seems relevant because it's related to the storage device emulation. But on the other hand, the issue is a programming error leading to a crash, which might be more of an internal problem rather than a peripheral-specific bug. Maybe 'other' is safer since I'm not certain if any specific category perfectly fits.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/558 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/558
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d73e4e70
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/558
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem description and see what's going on.
+
+The issue is with the GTK UI in QEMU. When a user clicks rapidly in a down-up-down pattern, the final "down" event isn't handled correctly. Instead, it sends an 'up' event immediately after, causing the guest to think the button was released even though it's still pressed. The user provided steps to reproduce this and some logs showing the events being misinterpreted.
+
+Looking at the logs, it seems that GTK is sending extra events like `GDK_2BUTTON_PRESS` and `GDK_3BUTTON_PRESS` after the initial press. QEMU is mistakenly treating these as release events because they're not properly handled in the code.
+
+The user included a diff showing where they added a check to ignore these double and triple press events. This makes sense because without this, those extra events could be causing incorrect button state reporting.
+
+Now, considering the categories: Mistranslation is about wrong semantic mappings, which might apply here if the event types are being incorrectly interpreted as releases. But looking deeper, the problem seems to stem from how the UI is handling GTK's additional press events, not necessarily a translation issue between architectures or IR. It's more about input handling in the guest environment.
+
+The bug affects the mouse device's reporting within the guest, so it relates to peripherals. The category 'peripherals' would cover issues with devices like mice and their interaction with QEMU. Therefore, this seems like a peripherals problem.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/569 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/569
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f10f56b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/569
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "ESP SCSI adapter not working with DOS ASPI drivers". Let's break it down.
+
+First, understanding what the issue is about. The ESP SCSI adapter is a hardware component used for connecting SCSI devices. The problem arises when using DOS ASPI drivers. ASPI stands for Advanced SCSI Programming Interface, which is used to communicate with SCSI devices in operating systems like MS-DOS. So, the bug is related to how QEMU handles this specific interaction between the SCSI adapter and the DOS drivers.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others like mistranslation or assembly.
+
+The ESP SCSI adapter is a hardware component emulated by QEMU. The issue is about compatibility with DOS ASPI drivers, which suggests it's related to the emulation of peripherals. Peripherals in QEMU would include devices like SCSI adapters, hard drives, CD-ROMs, etc., and how they interact with the virtual machine.
+
+Other categories like network or socket don't seem relevant here since the issue isn't about networking or sockets. Graphic is also not applicable because it's not related to display output. KVM might be involved in terms of hypervisor functions, but the specific problem is more about hardware emulation rather than the hypervisor itself. Boot and vnc are also unrelated.
+
+So, considering that this involves a SCSI adapter which is a type of peripheral device, the most appropriate category would be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to an issue with the ESP SCSI adapter's interaction with DOS ASPI drivers in QEMU. Since the problem relates to the emulation of a hardware component (SCSI adapter), which falls under peripherals.
+
+**Answer: peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/584 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/584
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..875208ef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/584
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that when emitting an IPI interrupt from core0 using the MPIC controller, core0 itself incorrectly triggers an IPI interrupt. They provided steps to reproduce and noted that it only happens when core0 emits the interrupt.
+
+First, I need to understand what each category means. Let's go through them one by one. 
+
+Mistranslation is about incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target in user-mode. That doesn't seem to fit here since this is a hardware-level issue with interrupts.
+
+Assembly lowering (assembly) refers to issues during the translation of code to assembly, which also doesn't apply here as it's more about interrupt handling rather than code translation.
+
+The other categories like device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc., each relate to specific parts of QEMU. Since this is about IPI interrupts and MPIC controller, which are part of the PowerPC architecture's interrupt handling mechanism, it seems related to how QEMU emulates the hardware, specifically the peripherals or perhaps the hypervisor.
+
+Wait, the MPIC is a multi-processor interrupt controller, so any issue with it would likely fall under 'peripherals' since it's part of the emulated hardware devices. Alternatively, it could be a kernel issue if it's related to how QEMU's kernel handles interrupts, but I think peripherals is more accurate here.
+
+Looking at the problem again: core0 emitting an IPI causes itself to receive the interrupt, which shouldn't happen. This suggests a flaw in how QEMU emulates the MPIC controller's behavior when handling IPIs from core0. Therefore, it's likely a bug in the emulation of a peripheral device (MPIC), making 'peripherals' the appropriate category.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/612297 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/612297
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..72d6e0d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/612297
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's see what the problem is.
+
+The user is reporting that qemu-kvm fails to detect the mouse when installing Windows 95. They've tried different options but still can't get the mouse to be detected. They mention that USB isn't supported during setup, so they have to install a driver later with usbsupp.exe.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about mouse detection. Mice are input devices, so this falls under peripherals. It's not a translation issue or related to graphics or networking. The problem occurs during the setup process, but it's more about hardware (peripherals) than boot issues.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves mouse detection failure in QEMU-KVM during Windows 95 installation, which relates to input device handling.
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/617 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/617
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..491bb5a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/617
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is about USB passthrough with a Conbee 2 failing after an upgrade to Fedora 34 and Libvirt 7.0.0. The user mentions that the Conbee appears in the VM but Deconz can't connect. They also note that physical Windows works fine, so it's not a hardware issue.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- Mistranslation: This usually involves incorrect semantic mapping from source to target, like in compilers or just-in-time compilers. Doesn't seem relevant here.
+- Assembly: Lowering assembly code; probably not related to USB passthrough issues.
+- Other: A catch-all category.
+- Device: Could be relevant since it's about a device (USB) not functioning properly.
+- Graphic: No mention of graphical issues, so unlikely.
+- Socket: Not applicable to USB.
+- Network: The problem isn't network-related but physical device connection.
+- KVM: Virtualization technology; relevant because the issue is with VMs using Libvirt/KVM.
+- Boot: Doesn't seem related to booting the system.
+- VNC: Remote access, not mentioned here.
+- Debug: Not an error in debugging tools themselves.
+- Files/Permissions: Possible if there are permission issues, but the user didn't mention that specifically.
+- Performance: Could be a possibility if it's a resource issue, but the problem seems specific to USB passthrough.
+- Kernel: Possibly related as USB drivers and virtualization rely on kernel components.
+- Peripherals: Directly related since Conbee is a peripheral device.
+- Hypervisor: Since Libvirt manages VMs via hypervisors like KVM, this could be relevant.
+
+The issue revolves around USB devices not being recognized in VMs after an upgrade. This points to either the hypervisor (Libvirt) or kernel handling of peripherals. Given that USB passthrough is a feature handled by the hypervisor and kernel modules, "peripherals" seems appropriate as it's about device management in virtual environments. Alternatively, "hypervisor" could also fit because it's about how Libvirt handles the VMs.
+
+However, since the primary issue is with the USB device not functioning correctly within the VM, "peripherals" might be more specific here. It indicates a problem with how peripherals are handled in the virtualized environment.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/646 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/646
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6c92cca1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/646
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The issue is about an infinite loop in the function xhci_ring_chain_length() located in hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c. This file is part of QEMU's USB xHCI controller emulation. The problem arises because the loop doesn't exit properly when trying to fetch empty TRBs (Transfer Request Blocks) from guest memory. Since the exit conditions are controlled by the guest, a privileged guest user can cause QEMU to hang, leading to a denial-of-service.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is related to the USB xHCI controller emulation. xHCI stands for eXtensible Host Controller Interface, which is part of USB hardware controllers. In QEMU, this would be emulated as a device. The issue occurs in hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c, which indicates it's part of the USB host controller device emulation.
+
+The problem isn't about translation issues (mistranslation) or assembly code lowering (assembly). It also doesn't fit into categories like network, socket, or vnc directly, though those might be involved in device handling. However, since it's specifically about the USB xHCI controller, which is a type of peripheral device, the most appropriate category here would be 'peripherals'.
+
+So, after considering all options, 'peripherals' seems to fit best as the category for this bug report.
+</think>
+
+The issue pertains to the USB xHCI controller emulation, which falls under the peripherals category.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/657006 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/657006
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e632617f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/657006
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is about the SVC instruction not triggering the PendSV handler in an ARMv7-M system. Let's break it down. The user provided a test case using FreeRTOS on an LM3S811EVB board. The issue occurs when calling `svc 0` within an assembly function, which should trigger the PendSV handler but doesn't.
+
+I know that the PendSV (Periodic Software Interrupt) is part of the ARM Cortex-M's interrupt handling mechanism. When a system call instruction (like SVC) is executed, it should generate a software interrupt. The bug implies that QEMU isn't correctly handling this interrupt, causing the PendSV handler not to be called.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- **mistranslation** refers to incorrect mapping from source to target architecture in user-mode. This might relate if there's an issue with how the instruction is translated.
+- **assembly** involves issues during assembly lowering. If QEMU incorrectly translates the SVC instruction, this could fall here.
+- **other**, but I need to see if another category fits better.
+- **device**: Maybe, as it relates to interrupt handling which is part of device peripherals.
+- **peripherals** seems relevant because NVIC and PendSV are part of the system's peripheral handling. The bug is about how QEMU emulates these hardware interrupts.
+
+The issue isn't with user-mode translation or assembly lowering directly but rather with how QEMU handles the system call instruction and interrupt routing. Specifically, it's failing to trigger the correct handler in the NVIC setup. This points more towards a problem with device or peripherals emulation.
+
+Given that, I think **peripherals** is the most appropriate category because it's related to how QEMU emulates the ARM Cortex-M's NVIC and interrupt handling mechanisms.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses an issue where the SVC instruction isn't triggering the PendSV handler in QEMU. This relates to how interrupts are handled by the NVIC, which is part of the device or peripheral emulation in QEMU.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/658152 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/658152
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..00e59886
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/658152
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user is having trouble with the "_" key not working when using a jp106 keyboard in their guest OS under QEMU/KVM. They mentioned that it works fine on the host but not in the guests.
+
+First, I need to consider what each category means. Looking at the list: mistranslation relates to incorrect mapping from source architecture to target; assembly lowering is about how assembly code is converted. Other categories include device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc.
+
+The issue here seems to be with keyboard input, specifically a key not being recognized in the guest OS. Since the user isn't using any special QEMU command line switches related to KVM or device passthrough, it's likely an issue within QEMU's handling of the keyboard input.
+
+Keyboard devices are peripherals, so maybe this falls under 'peripherals'. Alternatively, if it's about how keys are mapped from the host to guest, that might be a translation issue. But considering the user isn't using '-no-kvm-irqchip' or other specific switches, and it's about a keyboard input not working correctly in the VM, I think it's more related to device handling rather than translation.
+
+Wait, but the problem is specifically with the keyboard, which is a hardware device. So under QEMU/KVM, the virtualization of peripherals would be part of the hypervisor or KVM's device emulation. However, since the user didn't specify any issues with other devices and it's just the "_" key not working, I think it's more about how the keyboard events are being handled in the guest OS.
+
+Alternatively, maybe it's a translation issue where the key code isn't being correctly passed from the host to the guest. But considering that it's a specific key on a jp106 keyboard, which might have different mappings, perhaps it's related to how the input is being translated by QEMU.
+
+Hmm, I'm a bit torn between 'peripherals' and 'mistranslation'. If it's about incorrect mapping of the key code due to translation issues in QEMU's handling of the keyboard input, then 'mistranslation' would fit. But if it's about device emulation (like the keyboard device not working correctly), then 'peripherals' is more appropriate.
+
+I think I'll go with 'peripherals' because the issue is specific to the keyboard as a hardware device within the virtual machine.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/667 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/667
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..12fda69f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/667
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is asking about "Wacom EMR pen pressure support." I need to determine which category it falls into from the given list.
+
+First, I'll break down the terms in the bug report. Wacom EMR pens are devices used for input, typically in graphics tablets. Pen pressure support refers to how well the device's pressure sensitivity is handled by the system.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: there's 'graphic' which might seem relevant because it's related to visual input devices. However, more precisely, the bug is about device functionality, specifically a peripheral device (the Wacom pen). The issue isn't with graphics rendering but with the hardware support and interaction.
+
+So, considering all options, 'peripherals' seems like the best fit because it directly relates to how external devices like the Wacom pen are supported in the system. It's not about performance, kernel issues, or hypervisor problems; it's about device functionality.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is related to device support for a peripheral input device (Wacom EMR pen). Therefore, the category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/686 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/686
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a4c96b31
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/686
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let's read through it carefully.
+
+The problem happens when a VM is paused (using Openstack or libvirt commands) and then live-migrated twice. After the second migration, QEMU crashes, causing the VM to disappear. The logs show an assertion failure in block.c related to inactive block drivers and issues with Virtio devices during migration.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other.
+
+The bug is about live migration leading to a crash. Live migration involves moving a running VM's state from one host to another. The problem occurs when migrating twice without unpausing and repausing in between. This suggests an issue with how QEMU handles the state during migrations, especially after the first pause.
+
+The logs mention block devices failing to load correctly and Virtio device errors. Block devices are part of storage peripherals, so that points towards 'peripherals'. Alternatively, if it's related to the hypervisor (like KVM), but since it's about migration which is more of a QEMU/KVM feature, maybe 'hypervisor' could be considered.
+
+Wait, but in this case, the issue seems specific to device states not being properly handled during migration. The Virtio devices are part of the peripherals. Also, the block driver failure might relate to how storage devices are managed during migration.
+
+So, considering that the crash is due to issues with device state management during live migration, 'peripherals' makes sense.
+</think>
+
+The issue involves problems with device states and block drivers during live migration, which falls under 'peripherals'.
+
+**Answer:**
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/686613 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/686613
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f551558d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/686613
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report about QEMU where USB MSD aren't marked as removable. Let me go through the possible categories.
+
+First, the categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report mentions that guests can access USB Mass Storage Devices but they aren't marked as removable. So it's related to how QEMU handles USB devices in the guest OS.
+
+Looking at the categories, "peripherals" seems relevant because USB devices are peripherals. The issue is about their properties not being correctly set (removable), which affects device management in the VM.
+
+I don't think it's mistranslation or assembly since those relate to code translation or lowering. Other categories like network, socket, or graphic don't fit here. It’s more about device handling, specifically USB peripherals.
+
+So, the category should be "peripherals".
+</think>
+
+The bug report deals with how QEMU handles USB Mass Storage Devices (MSD), specifically that they aren't marked as removable in guest operating systems. This issue pertains to the management and configuration of hardware devices within a virtual machine environment. Since the problem is related to device properties and their interaction with the guest OS, it falls under the category of peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/687 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/687
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7a6ff309
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/687
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm looking at this bug report where the user is asking, "What is the DMAR?" in the context of QEMU. My task is to classify this under one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I need to understand what DMAR stands for in QEMU. From my knowledge, DMAR typically refers to "Device Management Area Register." In the context of virtualization, DMAR is related to Direct Memory Access (DMA) translation, which is used by devices like GPUs or other peripherals to access memory without going through the CPU. This is crucial for I/O virtualization.
+
+Looking at the categories provided, none directly mention DMA or device management. The closest might be 'peripherals' since DMAR deals with how devices are managed and accessed in a virtualized environment. Alternatively, it could also relate to 'hypervisor' because hypervisors manage such hardware abstractions, but I think 'peripherals' is more specific here.
+
+I don't see any connection to mistranslation, assembly issues, or performance problems. It's not about user-mode mappings or kernel/performance directly. So, the most appropriate category seems to be 'peripherals' since it pertains to device management in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/688052 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/688052
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..36324df2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/688052
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report related to QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's start by reading through the problem carefully.
+
+The user is having trouble with USB not working in their QEMU setup. They're using Debian Lenny and Squeeze, and they've installed qemu-kvm version 0.12.5 from the repository. They tried upgrading to the latest stable version, 0.13.0, hoping it would fix the issue, but it didn't help.
+
+Looking at the command line, they're using `-usbdevice host:002.007`. The error message they receive is "usb_create: no bus specified, using 'usb.0' for 'usb-host'". They also provided a link to another discussion which might be relevant but it's behind an email address.
+
+The guest OS is Debian Lenny with a 2.6.26 kernel. Additionally, the user attempted to download the development version via git clone but faced an interruption due to network issues, leading to an incomplete download.
+
+Now, considering the categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others.
+
+The issue is clearly related to USB functionality within QEMU. Since USB devices are considered peripheral hardware, this would fall under the 'peripherals' category. The error message suggests a problem with how the USB device is being passed to the guest, which is a typical issue in handling peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/69 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/69
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..de36bcc9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/69
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report about QEMU where ALSA underruns occur when using it. Let's think through the possible categories.
+
+First, the issue is related to audio because ALSA (Advanced Linux Sound Architecture) handles sound in Linux systems. So the problem likely falls under peripherals since ALSA deals with audio hardware.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: graphic, device, kernel, peripherals, etc. Peripherals include any external devices like audio cards or input devices. Since it's an underrun issue, which is a timing problem where data isn't played in time, this relates to how QEMU interacts with the audio subsystem.
+
+Other categories don't fit as well. For example, graphic would be about display issues, network for connectivity problems, KVM for virtualization aspects, but here it's specifically about sound. 
+
+So the best category is peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/696094 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/696094
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0a67b960
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/696094
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The user is working with QEMU and using a TI Stellaris lm3s811evb board based on ARM Cortex-M3. The issue they're facing is that the SysTick interrupt isn't being handled correctly in QEMU. When the systick event occurs, the interrupt handler doesn't execute, causing QEMU to get stuck in an infinite loop. They can't stop QEMU with Ctrl-C or GDB; only a hard kill works.
+
+Looking at the problem description, it's about the SysTick interrupt not working. The user provided some code traces showing how the NVIC and GIC are initialized and what happens when the systick event occurs. It seems that the interrupt is being set but the handler isn't triggering as expected.
+
+The user also mentions that CMSIS requires byte accesses to the NVIC, which the current QEMU doesn't support for unaligned 8-bit and 16-bit accesses. They provided some updated versions of arm_gic.c and other files as a workaround.
+
+So, what's the category here? Let me look at the possible options: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is related to how interrupts are handled. Since SysTick is a timer-based interrupt in the NVIC (which is part of the processor's peripheral), this falls under device or peripherals. The problem isn't about translation between architectures (mistranslation) or assembly lowering. It's more about the hardware peripherals not functioning correctly, specifically the NVIC and GIC setup.
+
+Therefore, the category should be 'peripherals' because it involves how QEMU emulates the ARM Cortex-M3's peripheral devices, particularly the interrupt controller.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is related to the SysTick interrupt not being handled correctly in QEMU. The issue arises with the initialization of the NVIC and GIC, leading to the interrupt handler not executing as expected. This affects the behavior of the hardware peripherals, specifically the timer interrupts.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/704 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/704
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..80d4cdea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/704
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. The report mentions "misaligned address for type 'struct linux_dirent64'". Hmm, misalignment usually refers to a data structure not being properly aligned in memory, which can cause issues when accessing it. This sounds like a problem with how data is handled at a low level.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation involves incorrect mapping from source to target, assembly lowering is about converting high-level code to assembly. Misalignment might fall under other if it's not directly related to translation or assembly steps but rather memory access issues.
+
+Wait, but maybe I should consider if this relates more to device handling or kernel interactions. The struct linux_dirent64 is part of the filesystem operations, so perhaps it's a peripherals issue because it involves file system structures accessed by QEMU.
+
+Alternatively, could it be related to user-mode assembly lowering? If there's an issue in how the code translates structs into memory addresses during compilation or execution, that might fall under assembly. But I'm not entirely sure.
+
+Another angle: misaligned addresses can lead to performance issues because accessing unaligned data can cause slowdowns. So maybe performance is a category here, but it doesn't directly specify that the bug is about performance degradation.
+
+Wait, but the main issue is about the structure's alignment causing an address problem, which likely relates to how QEMU handles filesystem operations. Therefore, peripherals might be more appropriate because it involves interacting with devices or file systems.
+
+So I'm torn between 'other' and 'peripherals'. Since the struct is part of directory entry handling in Linux, it's probably related to file system operations managed by QEMU as a peripheral device.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/717929 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/717929
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bf672fe3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/717929
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have this bug report about QEMU where someone is having trouble setting up serial communication between VMs. They tried using Unix sockets and PTY devices but ran into issues.
+
+First, the user mentioned that when they set up host A to bind a Unix socket and host B as a client connecting to it, if host A isn't running, the socket doesn't exist. So when starting host B, it can't connect and throws an error about the connection being refused. They're wondering if this is similar to a cable not being plugged in.
+
+Then they tried using pty devices but couldn't predict the exact device name under /dev/pts, which made them suggest allowing a way to define the exact device name.
+
+Looking at the categories, I need to figure out where this falls. The main issue seems to be with serial communication setup between VMs, specifically involving Unix sockets and PTY devices. Since this is about how QEMU handles serial devices and their connections, it relates more to peripherals rather than other areas like network or graphics.
+
+So the category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses issues with setting up serial communication between virtual machines using Unix sockets and PTY devices. The problem revolves around how QEMU handles these serial devices and their connections, which falls under the 'peripherals' category.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/72 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/72
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9114f4cb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/72
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "mouse offset or invisible wall 2.11.0-3". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, let's break down the bug report. It mentions "mouse offset" and "invisible wall." Mouse offset suggests that there might be an issue with how the mouse movement is being tracked or translated within the virtual machine. The term "offset" could imply a positioning problem, maybe the cursor isn't moving correctly relative to where it should.
+
+The "invisible wall" part makes me think of some kind of boundary that's preventing the mouse from moving beyond certain points. This sounds like a limitation in how the mouse input is handled by the system. It might not be allowing full movement across all areas, creating an invisible barrier—hence the name.
+
+Now, looking at the categories: 
+
+- Mistranslation is about incorrect semantic mapping from source to target architecture, so that doesn't seem right here.
+- Assembly lowering (assembly) is more about code translation during compilation, which isn't relevant here.
+- Other could be a possibility if it's not fitting into other specific categories.
+- Device category seems related because the mouse is an input device. Issues with devices often relate to how they're handled in virtualized environments.
+- Graphic might also come into play since mouse movement can be tied to graphical output, but the main issue here is about the mouse's behavior rather than visual rendering.
+
+Considering that QEMU is a hypervisor and emulator, issues with peripherals like mice are common. The problem described affects how the mouse interacts within the VM, which points towards it being related to device handling. So, under the categories given, "peripherals" seems like the most fitting category because it's about input devices not working as expected in the virtual machine.
+
+I don't think it's graphic or network-related since there's no mention of visual glitches or connectivity issues. It's more about the mouse's movement constraints, which is a hardware emulation problem.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/725 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/725
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6d6fc640
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/725
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU and trying to figure out which category it should be classified under. The problem is that the GICv3 ITS CTLR[Enabled] bit can't be cleared.
+
+First, let's break down what's being reported. The code in question is from hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c at line 899. The line of code given is `s->ctlr |= (value & ~(s->ctlr));`. I'm not entirely sure about the specifics here, but I know that GICv3 refers to a specific version of the General Interrupt Controller used in ARM systems. The ITS probably stands for interrupt translation service, which is part of managing interrupts in a virtualized environment.
+
+The bug description says that the Enabled bit in CTLR can't be cleared. That suggests there's an issue with how certain bits are being handled in the control register. In QEMU, this likely relates to how virtual devices or peripherals are emulated because GIC is related to interrupt handling, which is part of the device emulation.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+I'm considering whether this is a device-related issue because GICv3 ITS is part of the interrupt controller, which is a hardware peripheral. So if the Enabled bit can't be cleared, it's probably affecting how devices are handled in QEMU.
+
+But wait, I should think about what each category means. "Device" might refer to issues with specific device emulations or handling, but sometimes peripherals like GIC could fall under "peripherals." Alternatively, since this is related to interrupt controllers and their configuration, it's more about hardware peripherals.
+
+Looking at the code snippet again: the line `s->ctlr |= (value & ~(s->ctlr));` seems to be setting bits in the CTLR register. The bug is that the Enabled bit can't be cleared, which implies a problem with how certain operations are being handled when writing to this register.
+
+Since the issue is about not being able to clear a specific bit, it's likely related to how the device (specifically a peripheral) is being emulated or controlled in QEMU. Therefore, the category should probably be "peripherals" because it's dealing with hardware peripherals' behavior and their configuration through registers.
+
+Alternatively, could it be under "device"? The line between "device" and "peripherals" might be a bit blurred, but I think in this context, since it's about a specific peripheral component (the GICv3 ITS), it falls more under "peripherals."
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to the inability to clear a specific bit in the GICv3 ITS control register. Since the GICv3 is related to interrupt handling and device peripherals, the issue likely falls under the category of peripheral devices.
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/732155 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/732155
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..98d2a630
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/732155
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user is reporting an issue where the `system_reset` command doesn't work in QEMU-KVM when using the latest SeaBIOS, specifically when running without KVM (using `-no-kvm`). 
+
+First, I need to understand what each category means. The possible categories are:
+
+- **mistranslation**: Incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target, which happens in user-mode.
+- **assembly**: Assembly lowering issues.
+- **other**: Other bugs not fitting into specific categories.
+- **device**: Issues related to device emulation.
+- **graphic**: Problems with graphical output.
+- **socket**: Socket-related issues.
+- **network**: Network-related problems.
+- **KVM**: KVM hypervisor-specific bugs.
+- **boot**: Booting issues.
+- **vnc**: VNC connection problems.
+- **debug**: Debugging related.
+- **files**: File handling issues.
+- **permissions**: Permission problems.
+- **performance**: Performance-related bugs.
+- **kernel**: Kernel-related issues (probably in QEMU's kernel mode code).
+- **peripherals**: Issues with peripherals like serial ports, PS2, etc.
+- **hypervisor**: Hypervisor-specific bugs beyond KVM.
+
+Looking at the bug report, the user is using `system_reset`, which interacts with SeaBIOS. The issue occurs when KVM is disabled, but works when enabled. This suggests it's related to how QEMU handles resets without KVM acceleration.
+
+The logs show that after issuing `system_reset`, the system freezes. The user also mentions debug lines from both vl.c in QEMU and seabios. The problem seems to be in the reset request handling, which involves device-level interactions, particularly with I/O devices like the i8042 controller (used for keyboard, etc.).
+
+Since the issue occurs when KVM is off, it's likely related to how QEMU emulates hardware without KVM. SeaBIOS might not be resetting correctly in this scenario, leading to a hang. This points more towards a device emulation problem rather than an assembly or translation issue.
+
+Therefore, considering the categories, **peripherals** seems appropriate because the reset process involves handling devices like the keyboard controller (i8042). Alternatively, it could be **device**, but since it's about the reset functionality tied to specific hardware emulations, peripherals might be a better fit.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where `system_reset` fails in QEMU-KVM without KVM enabled, leading to system freezing. The problem likely stems from incorrect handling of device-level resets, specifically involving I/O devices like i8042. 
+
+**Answer:** **peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/757654 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/757654
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..687285c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/757654
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification. The issue is about UHCI failing to signal a stall response in QEMU.
+
+First, I'll read through the problem description carefully. The user mentions that when a Transfer Descriptor (TD) execution results in a STALL error, the system doesn't set the appropriate status bit or trigger an interrupt. They provided a scenario where sending a query like a set_idle request to a mouse causes this issue.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem revolves around USB Host Controller (UHCI) handling stall responses. UHCI is part of the USB controller in QEMU, which falls under peripherals. The bug is about how the controller manages error conditions and interrupt signaling, specifically for USB devices.
+
+The user's report isn't related to translation issues, so 'mistranslation' doesn't fit. It's not about assembly lowering either, so that category is out. None of the other categories like network or socket seem relevant here because the issue is specific to USB device handling.
+
+Therefore, the most appropriate category is 'peripherals' since it pertains to the USB controller and its interaction with devices.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/768 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/768
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..004b6249
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/768
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The user reported that the mouse cursor disappears in a RHEL guest when using specific options: "-device virtio-vga-gl -display gtk,gl=on". They also provided steps to reproduce, which include building QEMU with certain configurations and installing RHEL 8.5 before running it. The issue is that once the VM starts, moving the mouse causes the cursor to disappear.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem seems related to how the mouse input is handled in QEMU. The options used include VirtIO VGA with OpenGL and GTK display settings. Since the issue is about the mouse cursor disappearing, it's likely a problem with the display or graphics handling rather than something like network or permissions.
+
+VirtIO devices are usually part of the device category, but since this specifically affects the mouse (a peripheral) in the graphical environment, maybe it's more related to the graphic subsystem. Alternatively, it could be an issue with how the VirtIO-VGA interacts with the display setup, which might fall under peripherals or graphics.
+
+But wait, looking at the categories again, 'peripherals' is a separate category. The mouse is a peripheral device, so if the cursor disappears, it's probably related to how QEMU handles input devices in this context. However, since it's happening with VirtIO-VGA and GTK display options, maybe it's more about the graphics setup causing the issue.
+
+Alternatively, could it be a problem with the hypervisor or KVM? The bug occurs when using KVM as one of the enabled features during build, but I don't think that's directly causing the mouse issue. More likely, it's an interaction between the display and input handling.
+
+So considering all this, 'peripherals' seems like a possible category since the mouse is a peripheral device and its disappearance is related to how QEMU manages input in the VM.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/770 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/770
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bf78f4b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/770
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report where someone is talking about " READ memory access in /hw/acpi/pcihp.c". Let me break this down.
+
+First, the file path is "/hw/acpi/pcihp.c". The hw directory usually relates to hardware-related code. ACPI stands for Advanced Configuration and Power Interface, which deals with system hardware components. pcihp probably refers to PCI Hot Plug, which handles adding or removing PCI devices while the system is running.
+
+The issue mentioned is a "READ memory access", so it's related to how memory is being read in this context. Looking at the possible categories:
+
+- Mistranslation: I don't think this is about semantic mapping issues.
+- Assembly lowering: Maybe, but not sure if that's relevant here.
+- Device: This seems more about hardware devices.
+- Peripherals: That could be it since PCI relates to peripherals.
+
+Other categories like graphic, socket, network, etc., don't seem directly related. Since pcihp is about PCI devices and the bug involves memory access, which is a low-level hardware interaction, "peripherals" makes sense as the category. It's not about performance or kernel issues specifically but rather how the device (a peripheral) is being handled.
+
+So I think the correct classification is peripherals.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/79 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/79
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c788ddcd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/79
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report: "support horisontal mouse wheel." The user provided a list of possible categories, and I need to pick just one.
+
+First, let me read through the categories again: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The bug report is about supporting a horizontal mouse wheel. A mouse wheel is an input device, specifically part of the pointing device used to navigate. In the context of QEMU, which emulates hardware for virtual machines, this would likely relate to how the host's input devices are handled within the VM environment.
+
+Looking at the categories, "peripherals" seems like a good fit because it refers to handling various hardware devices that connect to the system, including input devices like mice. Other options like "device" could be too broad, and "graphic" is more about display rather than input. So, peripherals covers the mouse as an input peripheral.
+
+I don't think it's mistranslation or assembly because those relate more to code translation issues, not hardware device support. Similarly, other categories like network or socket don't apply here. So, peripherals seems correct.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/795 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/795
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4fa4b5ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/795
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. The error message is "meson.build: coreaudio check failed". Let me break this down.
+
+First, I know that meson.build is a build system used in various projects, including QEMU. So, when it fails a check, it's related to the build process. Now, the specific issue here is with CoreAudio. CoreAudio is an audio component framework on macOS, so if there's a problem during the build, it might be because of how the project is handling audio-related features.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+I'm trying to see which category fits best. The error is about CoreAudio during build time, so it's not directly related to user-mode assembly translation (mistranslation) or assembly lowering. It doesn't seem like a graphics issue (graphic), nor does it pertain to networking (network) or sockets.
+
+CoreAudio is part of the audio subsystem, which in QEMU might be considered a peripheral device driver, especially since it's dealing with hardware interaction for audio. However, if this is a build failure due to missing headers or incorrect checks during compilation, it could also fall under 'other' because it's a general build-time issue.
+
+Wait, but the bug report mentions 'coreaudio check failed', which might be part of the configuration process when building QEMU on macOS. Maybe it's about whether CoreAudio is available or not during compilation, which affects device support. So, if it's failing to check for CoreAudio correctly, that could impact the device drivers, specifically audio peripherals.
+
+Alternatively, since it's a build-time error and doesn't directly relate to any of the other specific categories like KVM, VNC, etc., maybe 'other' is the safest category. However, since CoreAudio relates to audio devices, which are peripherals, perhaps 'peripherals' is more accurate.
+
+I'm leaning towards 'peripherals' because it's about device drivers (CoreAudio being an audio driver on macOS), but I'm not entirely sure if build-time errors fall under that category. Alternatively, it could be 'other' as a general issue.
+
+After considering, since CoreAudio pertains to device support and the failure is during the check for its presence or availability, it's more about peripherals. Therefore, the category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/827 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/827
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..10353ca3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/827
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Stack-overflow through virtio_blk_get_request". The possible categories are given as mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, let me understand what the bug is about. "Stack-overflow" usually refers to a situation where there's too much recursion or too large an allocation on the stack, leading to memory issues. "virtio_blk_get_request" sounds like it's related to VirtIO, which is a virtualization technology used in QEMU/KVM for I/O between the host and guest.
+
+VirtIO devices are emulated hardware that the guest OS can use. blk probably stands for block device, so this function is likely part of the VirtIO block device emulation. The function name suggests it's retrieving or getting requests related to the block device.
+
+So a stack overflow in this context would be a bug where the call stack exceeds its limit, possibly due to deep recursion or large data being handled improperly. Now, looking at the categories:
+
+- Mistranslation: This is more about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture; doesn't seem relevant here.
+- Assembly: Lowering assembly code issues; not directly related to this bug.
+- Other: A general category for bugs that don't fit elsewhere.
+- Device: Relates to hardware devices. Since VirtIO_blk is a device emulation, maybe.
+- Graphic: Unrelated unless it's a display issue.
+- Socket, Network: Not relevant here as it's about block I/O.
+- KVM: Kernel-based virtual machine; perhaps related but more specific.
+- Boot: Doesn't seem directly connected.
+- VNC, Debug, Files, Permissions, Performance, Kernel, Peripherals, Hypervisor.
+
+The function is part of VirtIO, which is used by QEMU as a hypervisor. But the issue is within the device's request handling causing a stack overflow. So it's more about the device emulation itself rather than the hypervisor or KVM.
+
+Peripherals are hardware devices emulated in the VM, so this bug would fall under peripherals. Therefore, the category should be "peripherals".
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a stack overflow in the VirtIO block device request handling, which relates to peripheral device emulation in QEMU.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/838 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/838
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b8ce92d3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/838
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have this bug report to classify for QEMU. The report says: "qemu-system-arm, ast2600-evb, the address mapping of ASPEED_DEV_SPI2 is different from datasheet." 
+
+First, I need to understand what each part means. QEMU is an emulator and a hypervisor that allows running virtual machines. qemu-system-arm probably refers to the specific version or configuration for ARM architecture. The ast2600-evb is likely the evaluation board model being used.
+
+The main issue here is about address mapping of ASPEED_DEV_SPI2 not matching the datasheet. Address mapping in hardware emulators usually relates to how devices are assigned memory addresses within the virtual machine's address space. If QEMU maps a device incorrectly, it can cause the device to behave unexpectedly or not function at all.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation is about incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target, which could involve user-mode assembly issues. However, this seems more hardware-related. The other category is 'other,' but maybe there's a better fit.
+
+The problem mentions an address mapping discrepancy, which likely points to how QEMU maps device addresses in the virtual machine. Since it's about hardware devices and their memory addresses not aligning with what's expected (the datasheet), this falls under the peripherals category because it relates to how the emulator handles specific hardware devices' configurations.
+
+Peripherals in QEMU refer to all the devices that are emulated or connected, including SPI controllers. So if the address mapping is wrong, it affects the device's operation within the VM. Therefore, classifying this as 'peripherals' makes sense because it's about the interaction between QEMU and the specific hardware components.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/867 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/867
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..03b6c9de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/867
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me start by reading through the problem and understanding what's happening.
+
+The user provided a warning message: "qemu-system-x86_64: warning: usb-redir connection broken during migration." That mentions USB redirection (usb-redir) and migration, which I think relates to live migration of virtual machines. 
+
+Looking at the description, the issue occurs when creating a snapshot, restoring it, and then crashing. The steps are straightforward: create, restore, crash. They also included two images showing what seems like debug output before and after redirection.
+
+Now, considering the categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The warning mentions USB-redir, which is related to USB devices. So 'peripherals' might be a fit because USB devices are part of the system's peripherals. 
+
+But wait, the error occurs during migration. Migration in QEMU usually relates to moving a running VM from one host to another. The USB redirection being broken during this process could be due to network issues or misconfiguration in handling device connections.
+
+Looking at categories: 'network' is an option, but the primary issue seems to be with the USB device (peripherals) during migration. Alternatively, it might fall under 'other' if none of the specific categories fit exactly.
+
+However, since USB-redir is a feature that deals with peripheral devices, 'peripherals' seems more accurate. The error is about a broken connection related to USB redirection, which affects the peripheral device handling during migration.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/873460 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/873460
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5cb81177
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/873460
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned they're using Ubuntu 11.10 with Likewise 6 in a Microsoft domain. They noticed that when domain users log in, there's no sound, but local users don't have this issue.
+
+First, I need to understand what each category means. Let me go through the possible categories again: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is about sound not working for domain users. So, it's related to audio output. Sound issues usually point towards hardware or software handling of audio devices. In a virtualized environment like QEMU, this could be an issue with the way the VM handles audio devices or their drivers.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'peripherals' seems relevant because sound is typically handled by peripheral devices (like sound cards) and their corresponding drivers. The problem might be that the audio device isn't being properly configured or accessed when the user logs in from a domain account, possibly due to permission issues or how the VM interacts with the host's audio system.
+
+Other categories like 'network' don't fit because the issue is local to sound, not network connectivity. 'Permissions' could also be a factor, but since it's specific to sound and the environment is QEMU, I think 'peripherals' is more precise here.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue with sound not working for domain users in a virtualized environment using QEMU. Since sound is typically handled by peripheral devices, the appropriate category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/894037 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/894037
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..336f539a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/894037
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so the user is reporting a bug with QEMU where using the "-usbdevice tablet" option in VNC mode doesn't align the mouse pointers anymore. They mentioned that it's making their VMs unusable, specifically when booting Windows XP. The command line they're using includes several parameters like -vga std, -m 2048, and so on.
+
+First, I need to figure out which category this bug falls into from the given list. Let's look at the options again: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is related to VNC and USB devices, specifically a tablet mouse not aligning. The user is using "-usbdevice tablet", which implies it's about the USB device configuration in QEMU. Since the problem occurs when using VNC, but the main issue is with the mouse alignment, which is a peripheral input device.
+
+I should consider whether this relates to VNC specifically or more broadly to peripherals. The VNC part might be involved because the mouse handling could be affected by how the VNC client and server communicate. However, the immediate problem is that the USB tablet isn't working as expected in terms of pointer alignment, which points towards a peripherals issue.
+
+Looking at other possibilities: Is it a translation error (mistranslation)? Probably not, since it's about device behavior rather than semantic mapping. Assembly lowering? Unlikely, unless there's an assembly issue with device drivers, but that seems more technical and less likely the user's concern. Other categories like network or socket don't seem relevant here.
+
+Peripherals is a category listed, which would cover USB devices, including tablets. The problem is that the tablet isn't functioning correctly in VNC mode, so it's a peripherals issue. KVM might be involved since they're using enable-kvm, but the bug report focuses on the device not working as intended, not hypervisor-related functions.
+
+Therefore, the most appropriate category for this bug is "peripherals".
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/906864 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/906864
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4ac36887
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/906864
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem carefully.
+
+The user is experiencing an issue where their mouse gets grabbed automatically when moving over the QEMU window. They expected that the mouse would only be grabbed if they manually pressed the release/grab combination (like Ctrl-Alt). Now, every time the mouse moves over or within the window, it's grabbing again, which prevents them from using window-manager hotkeys.
+
+They mentioned testing this with different VGA types and window managers without any difference, so it doesn't seem to be a driver-specific issue. The problem occurs consistently across setups, pointing towards an issue in how QEMU handles mouse input.
+
+Looking at the command line, they're using "-usb -usbdevice tablet" which likely configures the virtual USB devices for the VM. The expected behavior is that the mouse should only be grabbed when explicitly releasing and grabbing again, not automatically on movement.
+
+I need to map this issue to one of the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, or other.
+
+The problem relates to mouse input handling, specifically how QEMU grabs the mouse. Since it's about the interaction between the host's windowing system and the QEMU window, this falls under the category of peripherals because it's dealing with hardware devices (mouse) and their behavior within the virtual machine environment.
+
+So, the category that best fits this bug is 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/91 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/91
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5a15fb64
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/91
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The bug report is about implementing support for SMBIOS Type 41 structures in QEMU. Let me think through each possible category to see where it fits best.
+
+First, let's understand what SMBIOS is. SMBIOS stands for System Management BIOS, which provides a standard way for operating systems to access detailed hardware information. In the context of virtualization, QEMU would need to expose this information correctly to the guest OS so that it can function properly.
+
+The bug report is an RFE (Request For Enhancement), meaning it's not a bug but a feature request. The user wants QEMU to support SMBIOS Type 41 structures. I'm not exactly sure what Type 41 is, but according to some quick research, SMBIOS types include various hardware information like processor (Type 4) or memory (Type 7), so maybe Type 41 is related to something else, perhaps specific hardware details.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. I need to find which category best fits the addition of SMBIOS support. 
+
+SMBIOS relates to hardware information exposed to the guest OS. In QEMU, this would likely fall under the 'peripherals' category because it's about emulating or providing access to hardware devices, including their specific configurations and data structures.
+
+Alternatively, it could be considered under 'other' since I'm not sure if there's a more precise category, but given that it's about hardware information and device configuration, 'peripherals' seems appropriate.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is about adding support for SMBIOS Type 41 structures in QEMU. Since this involves handling hardware-related information typically managed by hardware devices, the most fitting category is peripherals.
+
+**Answer:** peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/914 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/914
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bb88e274
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/914
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "Raspi4 emulation" into one of the provided categories. The options are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I think about what Raspi4 is. It's a Raspberry Pi 4 model, which has specific hardware components like GPU and other peripherals. When emulating it in QEMU, issues might relate to how the emulator handles these hardware components.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'peripherals' seems appropriate because the Raspi4 likely involves handling various peripheral devices (like GPU, audio, network interfaces) within the emulator. Other options like 'graphic' or 'network' could be specific parts, but the general term 'peripherals' covers a broader range of hardware components that might be involved in emulation.
+
+I don't think it's 'device' because that's too vague compared to 'peripherals.' Also, there's no mention of translation issues, so not 'mistranslation,' nor does it seem related to assembly or performance.
+</think>
+
+The bug report "Raspi4 emulation" likely relates to handling various hardware components within the emulator. The most fitting category is peripherals.
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/92 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/92
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e9cc18c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/92
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. The bug report is: "usb devices shouldn't have same vendor/product ID and same serial". 
+
+First, I'll break down what's being reported here. It seems like there's an issue with USB devices in QEMU where they're sharing the same vendor ID, product ID, and serial number. This could lead to problems because each USB device is supposed to have unique identifiers to function correctly within a system.
+
+Looking at the list of possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals. 
+
+I know that QEMU deals with emulating hardware devices, so "device" seems relevant here since USB is a type of hardware peripheral. However, the category specifically has "peripherals" as an option, which would be more precise than just "device". But checking the list again, I see "peripherals" isn't listed—wait, no, actually it's there under the initial list.
+
+Wait, let me check: the categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals. So "peripherals" is indeed one of them.
+
+The issue is about USB devices having duplicate IDs and serials, which relates to how QEMU handles USB peripheral devices. Therefore, the appropriate category should be "peripherals".
+
+I think I'm confident with this classification because it's directly related to hardware device management in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/923 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/923
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..da89e680
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/923
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report: "Kernel OOPS on SBSA-ref due to missing watchdog register". Let's break it down.
+
+First, "Kernel OOPS" suggests it's a kernel-related issue. Kernel oopses are typically related to problems in the operating system's kernel, which is part of QEMU as it's often used for emulating hardware and running virtual machines.
+
+Next, the reason given is "missing watchdog register". The watchdog timer is a hardware component that resets the system if it detects an error. In QEMU, this would be part of the emulation of hardware devices. So, when the kernel tries to access the watchdog register but it's missing, it causes an issue in the device emulation.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: kernel and peripherals seem relevant here. The kernel is involved because it's a kernel oops, but the underlying cause is related to a peripheral (the watchdog timer) not being properly emulated.
+
+So, I think this bug falls under "peripherals" since it's about a missing hardware component in the emulation, which affects the kernel behavior.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/93 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/93
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3ede2844
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/93
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report where QEMU version 1.4.2 has an issue with the USB keyboard not fully working. Let me think about how to approach this.
+
+First, I'll recall the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is related to a USB keyboard not working correctly. Since it's a hardware input device issue, that points towards a problem with how QEMU handles peripheral devices. In QEMU, the USB devices are emulated as peripherals for the virtual machine. If the keyboard isn't functioning properly, it likely has to do with the way QEMU is handling the USB device emulation.
+
+Looking at the categories, "peripherals" seems like the most appropriate because it's directly related to hardware devices being emulated within the VM environment. Other possible categories might be "device," but I think "peripherals" is more specific here since USB devices are a type of peripheral.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue with a USB keyboard not functioning properly in QEMU 1.4.2. Since USB devices are handled as peripherals in QEMU, the most fitting category is **peripherals**.
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/942 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/942
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..334c6017
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/942
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report: "No TPM support for riscv64 in QEMU". The possible categories are listed, and I should choose just one word from them.
+
+First, let's understand the bug. The user is reporting that there's no support for the Trusted Platform Module (TPM) when using RISC-V 64-bit architecture in QEMU. TPMs are hardware components used for security functions like encryption.
+
+Looking at the categories: Mistranslation, Assembly Lowering, Device, Graphic, Socket, Network, KVM, Boot, VNC, Debug, Files, Permissions, Performance, Kernel, Peripherals, Hypervisor, and Other.
+
+TPMs are typically peripherals because they're hardware devices that provide specific functionalities. In QEMU, peripherals are usually emulated or connected via device models. So the lack of TPM support would fall under a missing peripheral feature.
+
+Other categories don't seem to fit as well. It's not about translation issues (mistranslation), nor is it related to networking, sockets, etc. Since it's about hardware support for a specific device, "peripherals" makes sense.
+</think>
+
+The bug report concerns the absence of TPM support for RISC-V 64-bit in QEMU. Since TPMs are considered peripherals in this context, the category is:
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/958 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/958
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..94cb36fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/958
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. The problem is that when using qemu-system-sparc and accessing the floppy drive, it crashes with a segmentation fault. Let me think about which category this falls into.
+
+First, looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others like mistranslation or assembly.
+
+The issue is happening when accessing the floppy drive. The crash occurs specifically during floppy access, which suggests it's related to how QEMU emulates the floppy device. Floppy drives are part of the hardware devices that QEMU emulates for the guest system.
+
+So I should consider the 'device' category because it involves an input/output device. Alternatively, since the problem is with a specific peripheral (floppy drive), maybe 'peripherals' is more precise. However, looking back at the options, 'device' seems to be a broader category that could encompass peripherals like floppy drives.
+
+Wait, but I see 'peripherals' as a separate category. Maybe that's better. Let me check the categories again. Oh, in the list provided, 'peripherals' is an option. So perhaps it should go there because it's about emulating a specific peripheral device.
+
+But sometimes, when hardware devices aren't emulated correctly, it could be under 'device'. However, since the problem is with the floppy drive specifically, which is a type of peripheral, I think 'peripherals' would be the more accurate category here.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves QEMU crashing when accessing the emulated floppy drive. Since the issue relates to a specific hardware device's emulation, it falls under the peripherals category.
+
+**Answer:**
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/959852 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/959852
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5b16decb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/959852
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me go through it step by step.
+
+The bug report mentions that when building on OS X 10.7, there are warnings about deprecated CoreAudio APIs being used in the audio driver for Darwin. The user ran a configure command with certain flags and then tried to make, which resulted in these warnings during compilation of the coreaudio.o file.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue here is about deprecated APIs being used in the audio driver. CoreAudio is part of macOS, so it's related to how QEMU handles audio on Darwin systems. The warnings are during the build process, specifically in the audio component.
+
+So, the problem isn't with user-mode assembly or translation (mistranslation), nor does it seem to be a performance issue or something related to network, sockets, or graphics. It's not about KVM, VNC, booting, debug options, files, permissions, or hypervisor directly either.
+
+The key part is that the audio driver is using deprecated APIs. Since this is an audio-related component and CoreAudio is a framework for handling audio devices, the appropriate category would be 'peripherals'. This makes sense because it's dealing with hardware (audio) interactions within QEMU.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/977 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/977
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f4ede57b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/977
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report where QEMU 6.2 isn't shutting down properly when running Windows 98. Let's see what the options are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about shutdown not working correctly. Shutdown usually involves proper termination of processes and handling hardware states. Since it's related to QEMU, which emulates hardware, maybe it's a problem with how the emulator handles certain devices or peripherals during shutdown.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'peripherals' seems relevant because if a peripheral device isn't being handled properly during shutdown, that could cause issues. Alternatively, 'boot' might be involved if the issue occurs during startup or is related to booting Windows 98, but the problem here is about shutting down, not starting up.
+
+Another possibility is 'other', but I think 'peripherals' is more precise because it's likely a hardware emulation problem causing the shutdown failure. So, I'll go with 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where QEMU 6.2 fails to shut down properly when running Windows 98. This suggests a potential problem in how QEMU handles certain operations or devices during the shutdown process.
+
+Considering the categories:
+
+- **mistranslation**: This refers to incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target, typically in user-mode. Not directly related here.
+  
+- **assembly**: Relates to assembly lowering issues, which doesn't seem relevant.
+
+- **other**: A catch-all category, but perhaps not specific enough.
+
+- **device**, **graphic**, **socket**, **network**, **KVM**, **boot**, **vnc**, **debug**, **files**, **permissions**, **performance**, **kernel**, **peripherals**, **hypervisor**:
+
+  The issue involves improper shutdown, which could relate to hardware emulation. Since QEMU emulates devices and peripherals, the problem might stem from how it handles these components during shutdown.
+
+Given that, "peripherals" is the most fitting category as it pertains to hardware device handling.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/985288 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/985288
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..389febfb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/985288
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU's SCSI disk emulation. The issue is that the FUA (Force Unit Access) bit isn't being enforced in write-back mode. Let me think through each category.
+
+First, the categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is related to SCSI disk emulation not enforcing FUA in write-back mode. So it's about how the SCSI code handles certain operations. The FUA bit ensures writes go directly to non-volatile storage before returning, which is crucial for filesystem integrity, especially with NTFS.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'device' seems relevant because it's about emulating a device (SCSI disk) correctly. However, since this involves SCSI commands and their handling, another category like 'peripherals' might also fit because SCSI controllers are peripherals.
+
+Wait, but in QEMU, SCSI emulation is part of the device emulation layer, which falls under 'peripherals'. The issue here is about how the SCSI command (WRITE CDB) is processed, specifically not enforcing FUA. This isn't about translation between architectures or assembly code, so 'mistranslation' and 'assembly' don't fit.
+
+It's also not a network, socket, or performance issue. It doesn't relate to booting, VNC, debug, files (like file operations), permissions, kernel modules, KVM hypervisor, etc. So the most fitting category is either 'device' or 'peripherals'.
+
+Since SCSI is a type of peripheral device emulation in QEMU, I think 'peripherals' is more specific here than just 'device'. Therefore, the correct category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+peripherals
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/989504 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/989504
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..557918ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/peripherals/989504
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user provided a bug where an assertion failed when attaching a USB MSD device in QEMU.
+
+Looking at the details: the program is qemu-system-i386, and the command line includes various USB-related flags like -usb, -fda, -drive, -device usb-storage, etc. The error occurs in hcd-uhci.c at line 968, specifically an assertion failure related to a TD_RESULT_ASYNC_START.
+
+I know that QEMU has different components. The USB handling is part of the hardware devices, particularly under "peripherals." Since the bug is about attaching a USB device and it's failing during the USB storage setup, it relates to how peripherals are handled in the emulator.
+
+Other categories like "device" or "graphic" don't seem as specific here. "Peripherals" covers all I/O devices, including USB, so that fits best.
+</think>
+
+The bug involves an assertion failure when attaching a USB device, which falls under the handling of peripherals in QEMU.
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file