| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently the ramfb device loads the vgabios-ramfb.bin unconditionally,
but only the x86 need the vgabios-ramfb.bin, this can cause that when
use the release package on arm64 it can't find the vgabios-ramfb.bin.
Because only seabios will use the vgabios-ramfb.bin, load the rom logic
is x86-specific. For other !x86 platforms, the edk2 ships an EFI driver
for ramfb, so they don't need to load the romfile.
So add a new property use-legacy-x86-rom in both ramfb and vfio_pci
device, because the vfio display also use the ramfb_setup() to load
the vgabios-ramfb.bin file.
After have this property, the machine type can set the compatibility to
not load the vgabios-ramfb.bin if the arch doesn't need it.
For now the default value is true but it will be turned off by default
in subsequent patch when compats get properly handled.
Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20250717100941.2230408-2-shahuang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Implementing RAMFB migration is quite straightforward. One caveat is to
treat the whole RAMFBCfg as a blob, since that's what is exposed to the
guest directly. This avoid having to fiddle with endianness issues if we
were to migrate fields individually as integers.
The devices using RAMFB will have to include ramfb_vmstate in their
migration description.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit f79081b4b71b72640bedd40a7cd76f864c8287f1.
Patch has broken byteorder handling: RAMFBCfg fields are in bigendian
byteorder, the reset function doesn't care so native byteorder is used
instead. Given this went unnoticed so far the feature is obviously
unused, so just revert the patch.
Cc: Hou Qiming <hqm03ster@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200429115236.28709-2-kraxel@redhat.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If xres / yres were specified in QEMU command line, write them as an initial
resolution to the fw-config space on guest reset, which a later BIOS / OVMF
patch can take advantage of.
Signed-off-by: HOU Qiming <hqm03ster@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20190513115731.17588-4-marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com
[fixed malformed patch]
Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20180613122948.18149-3-kraxel@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
|
|
|
The boot framebuffer is expected to be configured by the firmware, so it
uses fw_cfg as interface. Initialization goes as follows:
(1) Check whenever etc/ramfb is present.
(2) Allocate framebuffer from RAM.
(3) Fill struct RAMFBCfg, write it to etc/ramfb.
Done. You can write stuff to the framebuffer now, and it should appear
automagically on the screen.
Note that this isn't very efficient because it does a full display
update on each refresh. No dirty tracking. Dirty tracking would have
to be active for the whole ram slot, so that wouldn't be very efficient
either. For a boot display which is active for a short time only this
isn't a big deal. As permanent guest display something better should be
used (if possible).
This is the ramfb core code. Some windup is needed for display devices
which want have a ramfb boot display.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20180613122948.18149-2-kraxel@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
|