add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/798 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/798
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ad37ac782
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/798
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The user reports that when using both `-sandbox on,elevateprivileges=deny` and `-daemonize`, QEMU fails to launch. However, without `elevateprivileges=deny`, it works fine even with `-daemonize`. 
+
+Hmm, so what's happening here? The issue seems related to the interaction between the sandbox option and daemonizing. The sandbox is a security feature in QEMU that restricts certain privileges. When `elevateprivileges=deny` is set, it prevents QEMU from running with elevated privileges, which might be necessary for some operations.
+
+When you run QEMU normally without `-daemonize`, it runs as the current user. But when you use `-daemonize`, QEMU forks into the background and often needs to drop privileges or adjust its process context. If `elevateprivileges=deny` is set, maybe there's a conflict during this daemonization process because the sandbox restrictions are making it impossible to proceed.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The bug is about permissions related to privilege elevation when using the sandbox with daemonize. The key issue is that QEMU can't start under these conditions because of a permission problem or incorrect handling of privileges during daemonization.
+
+So the category that best fits here is 'permissions' since it's about how QEMU handles privilege changes, especially when running in daemon mode.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file